Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

27
1 © Nokia Siemens Networks Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Report Q4 2009

Transcript of Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

Page 1: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

1 © Nokia Siemens Networks

Benchmark Palembang CityHCPT-XL Report

Q4 2009

Page 2: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYKPIs HCPT XL REMARKSNumber of Calls 127 132Successful Call Rate 97.64% 93.18%Call Set-Up Success Rate

97.64% 95.45%

Call Drop Rate 0.00% 2.27%Number of H.O. 349 614Handover Success Rate

99.15% 97.62%

# of Sectors Serving 128 226RX Level >= -80 dBm 98.3% 99.8%RX Quality <= 3 88.1% 83.8%MOS >=3.5 89.5% 76.8%Average Call Set-Up Time

7.29s 5.62s

Page 3: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Overview

Benchmark has been performed using SwissQual (SQ) End to End measurement toolDate: 01 - 04.12.2009Area: Palembang CityMeasurements have been performed with 1 mobile for each HCPT and XL:A number: Moving Calling ISDN Fixed Line NumberB number: Stationary Land unit Receiving Unit Call Setup: 120 sec. connected / 10 sec. idleMobiles Used: Nokia 6680

Page 4: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Idle Drive Test overview by RxLev Average (HCPT)

Page 5: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Idle Drive Test overview by RxLev Average (XL)

Page 6: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by RxLev Average (HCPT)

Page 7: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by RxLev Average (XL)

Page 8: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by RxQual sub (HCPT)

Page 9: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by RxQual sub (XL)

Page 10: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by MOS (HCPT)

Page 11: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Connected Drive Test overview by Speech Codec (HCPT)

Page 12: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

HCPT XLCompleted Completed calls 124 123

Success Rate 97.64% 93.18%Failure Failure 3 6CSSR CSSR 97.64% 95.45%Dropped Number of Drops 0 3

Drop Rate 0.00% 2.27%Total Nr of calls 127 132

Call Statistics

Head to Head comparison

Page 13: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

HCPT XLNumber of HO 349 614HO Success Rate 99.15% 97.62%Number of Assign. failed 2 3Assignment Failure rate 0.57% 0.48%Number of HO failed 1 12HO failure Rate 0.28% 1.91%

Head to Head comparison

Page 14: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Number of different Base Stations (sectors) covered

HCPT XL Number of Sectors 128 226

Call Status Technology Total Test's Rate*

Completed GSM 1800 87 65.91%

GSM 900 36 27.27%

Dropped GSM 1800 0 0.00%

GSM 900 3 2.27%

Failed GSM 1800 0 0.00%

GSM 900 6 4.55%

Total Call Attempts GSM 1800 87 65.91%

Total Call Attempts GSM 900 45 34.09%

Total Call Attempts 132 100.00%

Number of Test Calls by 900 / 1800 Network (XL only)

Percentage of Idle Rx Level Measurement by Band (XL only)Technology Total Samples Rate*GSM 900 4260 89.29%GSM 1800 511 10.71%

Page 15: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison Reason for Drop call

Reason for Call failed

Page 16: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison Idle Received Level

Page 17: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison Connected Received Level

Page 18: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Page 19: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Average of all setup times from dial command to connect acknowledge in seconds

HCPT Histogram Setup Time

05

101520253035404550

1.2

1.8

2.4 3 3.6

4.2

4.8

5.4 6 6.6

7.2

7.8

8.4 9 9.6

10.2

10.8

11.4 12 12.6

13.2

13.8

14.4 15 15.6

16.2

16.8

17.4 18 18.6

19.2

19.8

Setup Time

Tota

l Tes

t's

XL Histogram Setup Time

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1.2

1.8

2.4 3 3.6

4.2

4.8

5.4 6 6.6

7.2

7.8

8.4 9 9.6

10.2

10.8

11.4 12 12.6

13.2

13.8

14.4 15 15.6

16.2

16.8

17.4 18 18.6

19.2

19.8

Setup Time

Tota

l Tes

t's

Page 20: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison RxQual

Page 21: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison MOS values

Page 22: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Number of Samples Collected

HCPT XL REMARKSIdle RxLevel 4395 4376Connected RxLevel 5057 4882RxQuality 4839 4605MOS 656 762

Page 23: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Speech Codec

Page 24: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison Idle Received Level Per Quarter

Page 25: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison Received Quality Per Quarter

Page 26: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Head to Head comparison MOS Per Quarter

Page 27: Benchmark Palembang Report HCPT-XL Q4-2009

01 – 04 December 2009 Benchmark Palembang City HCPT-XL Q4 2009

Thank You