US CMS Status

30
UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 1 US CMS Status US CMS Status Dan Green US CMS PM June 11 , 2002

description

US CMS Status. Dan Green US CMS PM June 11 , 2002. Outline. Overview – CMS Detector Construction – US CMS Project Office Activities – US CMS SWC The Research Program. Belgium. Bulgaria. Austria. USA. Finland. CERN. France. Germany. Greece. Russia. Hungary. Uzbekistan. Italy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of US CMS Status

Page 1: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 1

US CMS StatusUS CMS StatusUS CMS StatusUS CMS Status

Dan Green

US CMS PM

June 11 , 2002

Page 2: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 2

OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline

• Overview – CMS

• Detector Construction – US CMS

• Project Office Activities – US CMS

• SWC

• The Research Program

Page 3: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 3

CMSCMSCMSCMS

Major challenges due to geographyAn example is LHC computing:

Communication and collaboration at a distanceDistributed computing resources Remote software development and physics analysis

1800 Physicists, 147 Institutes, 32 Countries

Slovak Republic

CERN

France

Italy

UK

Switzerland

USA

Austria

Finland

GreeceHungary

Belgium

Poland

Portugal

SpainPakistan

Georgia

Armenia

UkraineUzbekistan

CyprusCroatia

China, PRTurkey

Belarus

EstoniaIndia

Germany

Korea

Russia

Bulgaria

China (Taiwan)Iran

Page 4: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 4

Higgs Discovery LimitsHiggs Discovery LimitsHiggs Discovery LimitsHiggs Discovery Limits

At L0=2x1033 cm-2s-1:

1 fill (6hrs) ~ 26 pb-1

1 day ~ 60 pb-1

1 month ~ 2 fb-1

1 year ~ 20 fb-1

CMS is, however, united in the desire to do the Physics. To effectively exploit the physics potential of the LHC and the investment put into the machine and the detectors CMS needs to COMPLETE its detector, commission and then operate it.

3 mo

~1 yr

Page 5: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 5

CMS ManagementCMS ManagementCMS ManagementCMS Management

Page 6: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 6

CMS ConstructionCMS ConstructionCMS ConstructionCMS Construction

By end of next year ~70% of the detector will have been committed.

Page 7: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 7

Progress: Si Tracker Progress: Si Tracker Progress: Si Tracker Progress: Si Tracker

Front-end hybrid with front-end ASICs

Si Sensors

Page 8: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 8

Schedule – 4/07 BeamSchedule – 4/07 BeamSchedule – 4/07 BeamSchedule – 4/07 Beam

Delay in LHC machine and in UX5 Beneficial Occupancy means that mitigation and tests in SX5 must be planned.

Page 9: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 9

Point 5 - CMSPoint 5 - CMSPoint 5 - CMSPoint 5 - CMS

The UX5 area has turned the corner – no further delays due to civil construction problems are anticipated.

Page 10: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 10

US CMSUS CMS387 Members from 38 Institutions387 Members from 38 Institutions

US CMSUS CMS387 Members from 38 Institutions387 Members from 38 Institutions

New groups due to SiTrkr scope increase and other natural growth.

Page 11: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 11

Overview, CMS and US CMSOverview, CMS and US CMSOverview, CMS and US CMSOverview, CMS and US CMS

WBS 5.-FPIX(NW)

WBS 4.-ECAL(UMinn)

WBS 1. -EMU(UF)

WBS -2.HCAL(UM)

WS 6.-CP

(UW,FNAL)

WBS 3.-

Trigger (UW)

DAQ(MIT)

1. Endcap Muon -Cathode Strip Chambers

2. Hadron Calorimeter - full HB, HOB, HE and HF transducers and readout.-HE scint, HF QP fibers

3.Endcap muon and calorimeter trigger. DAQ filter

4. Electromagnetic Calorimeter - barrel transducers, front end electronics, and laser monitor

5. Forward pixels

6. Common Projects - endcap yoke, barrel cryostat and superconductor

7. Project office

8. Si Tracker – full TOB

CMS and US CMSCMS and US CMSCMS and US CMSCMS and US CMS

WBS 8. -Si Trkr(UCSB)

Page 12: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 12

Installing ME PrototypeInstalling ME PrototypeInstalling ME PrototypeInstalling ME Prototype

US CMS is scheduled to deliver chambers in 2002. They will need to be operated and tested. This situation leads to the plan for “slice tests”. They consist of data readout of the detector operated with a portable Trigger and DAQ in SX5.

Page 13: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 13

HCAL - Engineering in WH6 Design of HCAL Design of HCAL Design of HCAL Design of HCAL

Page 14: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 14

HB – Mechanics and OpticsHB – Mechanics and OpticsHB – Mechanics and OpticsHB – Mechanics and Optics

HB- is installed in SX5, HB+ is complete and wedges are stuffed with megatiles in building 186. HE- is delivered to SX5. HF wedges are being delivered to CERN. Test beam is in 2002 with ~ final readout ASICs and optical links.

Page 15: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 15

PO - Funding BA and PlanPO - Funding BA and PlanPO - Funding BA and PlanPO - Funding BA and Plan

US CMS DOE Funding and Commitments

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05

Fiscal Year

Am

ount (A

Y $

M)

DOE Funding

Commitments

The plan is to saturate the BA for the first 7 years and leave good sized contingency for the last 3 years. With the “current” CERN LHC schedule, US CMS will spill into FY06 by ~ 2 M$ due to delayed installation in UX5. We are decoupled for delivery and commissioning in SX5.

Page 16: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 16

Trends, Closing Tasks Trends, Closing Tasks Trends, Closing Tasks Trends, Closing Tasks

US CMS Detector Project

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Sep

-96

Sep

-97

Sep

-98

Sep

-99

Sep

-00

Sep

-01

Sep

-02

Sep

-03

Sep

-04

Sep

-05

AY

M$

BCWSBCWPACWPCLACEACTPCBA

We are closing tasks after the finish date + 1 year. The lag in invoicing is ~ 6 months on average. The Project is 67% complete and retains 52% contingency on the work to completion

Page 17: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 17

FY02 Base RequestFY02 Base RequestFY02 Base RequestFY02 Base Request

DOE - FY02 Base Request17 Requests, 1115 k$

BostonUC DavisUCLA B (Cline -DOE)UCLA E (Hauser - DOE)UCLA F (Arisaka - DOE)UCLA (Schlein-NSF)UC RiversideUC San Diego (DOE)UC San Diego (NSF)UC Santa BarbaraCaltechCarnegie MellonFairfieldFermilabFloridaFlorida Institute TechFlorida StateIllinois ChicagoIowaIowa StateJohns HopkinsKansasKansas StateMaryland (DOE)Mayland (NSF)MinnesotaMississippiMITNebraskaNortheasternNorthwesternNotre DameOhio StatePrincetonPurdue - BortolettoPurdue - ShipseyPurdue D (Gutay)Purdue G (Barnes)RiceRochesterRutgersTexas Tech Virginia TechWisconsin

NSF - FY02 Base Request3 Requests, 220 k$

BostonUC DavisUCLA B (Cline -DOE)UCLA E (Hauser - DOE)UCLA F (Arisaka - DOE)UCLA (Schlein-NSF)UC RiversideUC San Diego (DOE)UC San Diego (NSF)UC Santa BarbaraCaltechCarnegie MellonFairfieldFermilabFloridaFlorida Institute TechFlorida StateIllinois ChicagoIowaIowa StateJohns HopkinsKansasKansas StateMaryland (DOE)Mayland (NSF)MinnesotaMississippiMITNebraskaNortheasternNorthwesternNotre DameOhio StatePrincetonPurdue - BortolettoPurdue - ShipseyPurdue D (Gutay)Purdue G (Barnes)RiceRochesterRutgersTexas Tech Virginia TechWisconsin

At the start of each FY, US CMS makes a request for additional base support to DOE and NSF. For FY02 this request involved 20 university groups. The annual request serves as a point of contact between US CMS and the funding agencies when the priorities of US CMS can be brought to DOE and NSF.

Page 18: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 18

FY02 SupplementaryFY02 SupplementaryFY02 SupplementaryFY02 Supplementary

DOE - FY02 Supplement28 Universities - 300 k$

BostonUC DavisUCLA B (Cline-DOE)UCLA E (Hauser-DOE)UCLA F (Arisaka-DOE)UCLA (Schlein-NSF)UC RiversideUC San Diego (DOE)UC San Diego (NSF)UC Santa BarbaraCaltechCarnegie MellonFairfieldFloridaFlorida Institute TechFlorida StateIllinois ChicagoIowaIowa StateJohns HopkinsKansasKSUMaryland (Skuja-DOE)Mayland (Sullivan-NSF)MITMinnesotaMississippiNebraskaNortheasternNorthwesternNotre DameOhio StatePrincetonPurdue D (Gutay)Purdue G (Barnes)Purdue - BortolettoRiceRochesterRutgersTexas Tech Virginia TechWisconsin

NSF - FY02 Supplement8 Universities - 75 k$

BostonUC DavisUCLA B (Cline-DOE)UCLA E (Hauser-DOE)UCLA F (Arisaka-DOE)UCLA (Schlein-NSF)UC RiversideUC San Diego (DOE)UC San Diego (NSF)UC Santa BarbaraCaltechCarnegie MellonFairfieldFloridaFlorida Institute TechFlorida StateIllinois ChicagoIowaIowa StateJohns HopkinsKansasKSUMaryland (Skuja-DOE)Mayland (Sullivan-NSF)MITMinnesotaMississippiNebraskaNortheasternNorthwesternNotre DameOhio StatePrincetonPurdue D (Gutay)Purdue G (Barnes)Purdue - BortolettoRiceRochesterRutgersTexas Tech Virginia TechWisconsin

In addition, funds are set aside by the DOE base program and the US CMS detector project (for NSF) in support of US CMS groups. For FY02, there were 36 university groups receiving support.

Page 19: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 19

US CMS - EducationUS CMS - EducationUS CMS - EducationUS CMS - Education

The US CMS PO supports proposals for educational initiatives. Randy Ruchti (N.D.), US CMS Education Coordinator, is responsible for prioritizing the proposals.

The US CMS Project Office then funds the agreed upon proposals.

QuarkNet is a powerful example of the educational possibilities inherent in the LHC. Marge Bardeen is Fermilab coordinator.

Page 20: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 20

SWC: Tier – 1,2 in the USSWC: Tier – 1,2 in the USSWC: Tier – 1,2 in the USSWC: Tier – 1,2 in the US

Page 21: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 21

Preparing for First BeamPreparing for First BeamPreparing for First BeamPreparing for First Beam

Page 22: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 22

Status and ProgressStatus and ProgressStatus and ProgressStatus and Progress

Page 23: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 23

User Facilities StatusUser Facilities StatusUser Facilities StatusUser Facilities Status

Page 24: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 24

Prototype OperationPrototype OperationPrototype OperationPrototype Operation

Page 25: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 25

Guidance for the Research Guidance for the Research ProgramProgram

Guidance for the Research Guidance for the Research ProgramProgram

JOG Support of US CMS

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

FY

96

FY

98

FY

00

FY

02

FY

T0

4

FY

06

AY

M$

Research ProgramGuidance

Detector

US CMS have received guidance from DOE and NSF. The Research Program contains SWC, M&O and R&D for upgrades. Review was on April 9-11. There will be intense future scrutiny.

Page 26: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 26

Fermilab Letter on M&OFermilab Letter on M&OFermilab Letter on M&OFermilab Letter on M&O

FNAL has proposed to use GPP funds to site US CMS on WH11 – VCR, PAC. Support for US CMS at FNAL is strong.

Page 27: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 27

The VCR and PAC on WH11The VCR and PAC on WH11The VCR and PAC on WH11The VCR and PAC on WH11

Need space, access to Computing Division, theorists, seminars, other experimenters, PO, VCR

Fermilab proposes to use GPP funds to set up US CMS in WH11. The US CMS groups strongly support this initiative because it saves them travel time and money and creates a critical mass of physicists who will be doing analysis.

Page 28: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 28

Comm Ops – CatA, VCR, PAC, Comm Ops – CatA, VCR, PAC, WBS 18 WBS 18

Comm Ops – CatA, VCR, PAC, Comm Ops – CatA, VCR, PAC, WBS 18 WBS 18

Cat A began Oct., 2001. VCR will be used in “burn-in” of HCAL, EMU and in “slice tests”. PAC will be used by PRS groups for HLT studies, Physics TDR, MDC, and data analysis proper.

Page 29: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 29

VCR, PAC and OutreachVCR, PAC and OutreachVCR, PAC and OutreachVCR, PAC and Outreach

Page 30: US CMS Status

UEC User’s Meeting - June 11, 2002 30

SummarySummarySummarySummary

• Fermilab is involved in US CMS both as the “host laboratory” (E-892) and as one of the collaborating institutions.

• As the host, FNAL contributes access to existing facilities in order to support university groups. New initiatives are charged to the US CMS Project.

• The US CMS PO at FNAL provides management for the construction project.

• The US CMS Construction Project is on schedule and on budget.

• The SWC effort is well launched with the aim of being fully functional by the first beam.

• Planning for the US CMS Research Program began 2 years ago. It will continue to be refined.