Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures Wednesdays, 17.00, SDT Jan Suffczyński Projekt Fizyka Plus nr...
-
Upload
seth-elliott -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures Wednesdays, 17.00, SDT Jan Suffczyński Projekt Fizyka Plus nr...
Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures
Wednesdays, 17.00, SDT
Jan Suffczyński
Projekt Fizyka Plus nr POKL.04.01.02-00-034/11 współfinansowany przez Unię Europejską ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Kapitał Ludzki
Lecture 12: Single photon correlations and cavity mode emission
Plan for today
1. Reminder 2.
Photon emissionstatistics
3. Origin of the emission with the cavity mode
Strong coupling –Rabi splitting
Ener
gy
Eigenstates :Entengled states emitter-photon
RabbiSplitting DR
(|0,1> + |1,0>)/ 2
(|0,1> |1,0>)/ 2
|0,1> ↔
In resonance:
Oscillationswith Rabi frequency = R / h
|1,0>
|0,1> :
|1,0> :
Emitter in ground state
Excitedemitter
Empty cavity
Photon inside cavity
Out of the resonence:
Weak vs strong coupling
Out of the cavity
Strong coupling regime
• At resonance QD- Cavity mode: anticrossing of the levels!
QD– Cavity mode detuning
Energy levels versus detuning:
4)( 22MQDRabi g Rabi splitting:
4)( 22MQDRabi g
Reithmaier et al., Nature (2004)
Weak coupling vs strong coupling
Equal intensity at resonance/X intensity increased at resonance
Anticrossing/no anticrossing
Exchange of linewidths/no lw exchange
CorrelationCorrelation (lat. correlation-, correlatio, from com-, „together, jointly”; and relation-, relatio, „link, relation”
Correlations macro in the world:
Correlations
Correlations
Correlations
Korelacje
A statistical effect!
Correlation function
)()(
)()()()2(
tItI
tItIg
ba
baab
represents probability of detection of the second photon at time t + , given
that the first one was detected at time t
)()2( abg
Od źródła fotonów
Dioda „START”
Dioda „STOP”
n( = tSTOP- tSTART)
Idea pomiaru korelacji między pojedynczymi fotonami
)()( )2( abgn
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lic
zba
zdar
zen
= t2 - t
1
= t2 – t1
t1 = 0t2 = 20
wejścieSTART
wejścieSTOP
Karta do pomiaru korelacji
Dioda „START”
Dioda „STOP”
Licz
ba s
kore
low
anyc
h zl
icze
ń n(
)
Od źródła fotonów
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lic
zba
zdar
zen
= t2 - t
1
= t2 – t1
t1 = 0, t2 = 0
wejścieSTART
wejścieSTOP
Karta do pomiaru korelacji
Od źródła fotonów
Skor
elow
anyc
h zl
icze
ń n(
)
Dioda „STOP”
Dioda „START”
Correlation function )()2( g
T
time t
0)0()2( g
-40 -20 0 20 400
1
2
g()
= t2 – t1
T
0
Single photon source (pulsed):
0)0()2( g
-40 -20 0 20 400
1
2
g()
0
Single photon source (cw):
time t
-40 -20 0 20 400
1
2
g() 1)()2( g
0
Coherent light source (cw):
time t
1)0()2( g
-40 -20 0 20 400
1
2
g()
0
Thermal light source:
time t
Photon statistics
Bose-Einstein distribution
Poissonian distributionLASER
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
P(n
)
n
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
P(n
)
n
Sub-poissonian distribution
0 1 2 3 4 5 60.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
P(n
)
n0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
P(n
)
n
Single photon sources
– single atoms
– single molecules
– single nanocrystals
– NV in diamond
h
• highly efficient
• work with high repetition rates
• excited optically / electrically
• easy to integrate with electronics
• + more …
− single semiconductor quantum dots
(Koenraad et al.)
Pojedyncze fotony z QD na żądanie
2210 2215 2220 2225
XX
CX
-P
L I
nte
ns
ity
[a
rb.
un
its
]
Photon Energy [meV]
X
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600
250
500
750
Zlic
zen
ia
= tSTOP
- tSTART
(ns)
Autokorelacja emisji z ekscytonu neutralnego (X-X):
START
X
czas
Od próbki
• Rejestrowane fotony pochodzą z pojedynczej kropki
• g( 2)(0) = 0.073 = 1/13.6
X
X
STOP
START
STOP
X
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600
100
200
300
400
500
Co
un
ts
= tX-t
CX [ns]
X-CX cross-corelation
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 600
100
200
300
400
500
Co
un
ts
= tX-t
CX [ns]
Three carriers capture
Single carrier capture
STOP
Single carrier capture
<0 ↔ CX emissionafter X emission:
STOPX
START
time
XCX
START
time
CX
>0 ↔ X emission after CX emission:
X after CXCX after X
XX-X crosscorrelationSTOP (H)START (H)
-40 -20 0 20 400
200
400
600
800
1000
H / H
Cou
nts
= tX- t
XX [ns]
5.24
2210 2215 2225
X
CXXX
H V
-PL
Int
ensi
ty [
arb.
uni
ts]
Photon Energy [meV]
START STOP
XX X
time0
• XX-X cascade
Origin of the emission within the caviy mode
Energy
PL ~15 meV
Cavity mode
QD
~1 meV
Why is emission at the mode wavelength observed?
Strong coupling in a single quantumdot–semiconductor microcavity system, Reithmaier et al., Nature (2004)
Strong emission at the mode wavelength even for large QD-mode detunings
Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantumdot–cavity system, Hennessy et al., Nature (2007):
Time (ns)
Autocorrelation M - MCrosscorrelation QD - M
Time (ns)
„Off-resonant cavity–exciton anticorrelation demonstrates the existence of a new, unidentified mechanism for channelling QD excitations into a non-resonant cavity mode.”
„… the cavity is accepting multiple photons at the same time - a surprising result given the observed g(2)(0)≈ 0 in cross-correlation with the exciton.”
1352
1356P
hoto
n E
nerg
y (m
eV)
X
XX
CXM
T = 40 K
Dynamics of the QD emission – Purcell efect
1352 1356
XXCX
10 KXM
33 K
44 K
Pho
tolu
min
esce
nce
(arb
. uni
ts)
50 K
Photon Energy (meV)
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Time (ns)
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0Time (ns)
1352
1356
Pho
ton
Ene
rgy
(meV
)
X
XX in resonanse with the Mode
CX T = 10 K
tXX = 140 ps when XX in resonanse with the mode - Purcell efect
Pillar A (diameter = 1.7mm, gM = 1.08 meV, Q = 1250,Purcell factor Fp= 7.2
10 20 30 40 500.0
0.5
1.0
Dec
ay ti
me
(ns)
Temperature (K)
XX
When XX-M detuning increases Purcell efect decreases XX decay longer
Emission dynamics at mode wavelength the same as XX emission dynamics !
Above T = 45 K – 50 K carrier lifetime in wetting layer increases excitonic decay gets longer
10 20 30 40 500.0
0.5
1.0
Dec
ay ti
me
(ns)
Temperature (K)
XX M
pillar A
Dynamics of the emission of the coupled system
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
710 ± 30 ps
M
Eim
issi
on Int
ensi
ty (ar
b. u
nits
)
Time (ns)
X
670 ± 30 ps
Pillar B, diameter = 2.3 mm,gM = 0.45 meV, Q = 3000,
Purcell factor Fp= 8
T = 53 K
T = 53 KX
M
1344 1346 1348
M
X
M
67K
57K
44K
62K
53K
Pho
tolu
min
esce
nce
(arb
. uni
ts)
Photon Energy (meV)
X
Ene
rgy
pillar B
pillar B
X and M decay constants similar
Dynamics of the emission of the coupled system
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.50.0
0.5
1.0
Dec
ay ti
me
(ns)
X
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.50.0
0.5
1.0
Dec
ay ti
me
(ns)
X M
50 60 70
X E
mis
sion
Inte
nsity
(arb
. uni
ts)
44Temperatura (K)
Odstrojenie X - M (meV)
pillar B
X emission intensity increases when X-M detuning decreases: Evidence for Purcell effect
T> 45 K :Shortening of the X lifetime with decreasing X- M detuning impossible to be observed
Purcell factor determination basing on the emission dynamics not always reliable
M i X decay constants similar
Dynamics of the emission of the coupled system
Below T=45 K temperature does not affect the X emission dynamics. PL decay time reflects exciton recombination rate
10 20 30 40 500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Dec
ay T
ime
(ns)
Temperature (K)
X,meza APillar A
T< 45 K
Exciton dynamics vs T, pillar A
Exciton emission decay longer for T > 45 - 50 K
PL decay time does not reflect exciton recombination rate
T> 45 K
10 20 30 40 500.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Dec
ay T
ime
(ns)
Temperature (K)
X,meza APillar A
Exciton dynamics vs T, pillar A
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Mod
e D
ecay
Tim
e (n
s)
QD Decay Time (ns)
slope = 1.02 ± 0.08
Strong correlation between exciton and Mode decay constants
The same emitter responsible for the emission at both (QD i M) energies
QD-M detuning (< 3gM) does not crucial for the QD→M transfer effciency
-2 0 20.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
M / Q
D
Detuning /M J. Suffczyński, PRL 2009
Statistics on different micropillars
Naesby et al., Phys. Rev. A (2008) Influence of pure dephasing on emission spectra from single photon sources
Dephasing rate :
The role of QD state dephasing
0.0
0.5
1.0
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
Rel
ativ
e M
ode
Int
ensi
ty
X-M Detuning (meV)
Naesby et al.: effects of QD states dephasing responsible fort the emission at mode wavelength
X M
Em
issi
onIn
tens
ity
(arb
. uni
ts)
Pillar B, gM = 0.45 meV
Contribution from different emission lines
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Mod
e D
ecay
Tim
e (n
s)QD Decay Time (ns)
slope = 1.02 ± 0.08
When two lines are detuned similarly from the mode, the contribution from more dephased one to the mode emission is dominant
Phonons - diatomic chain example
M m M m M
Solutions to the Normal Mode Eigenvalue Problemω(k) for the Diatomic Chain
There are two solutions for ω2 for each wavenumber k. That is, there are 2 branches to the “Phonon Dispersion Relation” for each k.
0 л/a 2л/a–л/a k
wA
BC
ω+ = Optic Modes
ω- = Acoustic Modes
Transverse optic mode for the diatomic chain
The amplitude of vibration is strongly exaggerated!
Transverse acoustic mode for thediatomic chain
Interpretation of the single photon correlation results
Crosscorrelation M - X = (X+CX+XX) - X = X-X + CX-X + XX-XX-X CX-X XX-X
1
0
1
0
1
0
+ +a* b* c*
g(2) (t) g(2) (t) g(2) (t)
t t t
↔
1
0
=
M-X
Hennessy et al., Nature (2007) g(2)(0) ~ 0 Asymmetry of the M-X correlation histogram
M-Xg(2) (t)
tt (ns)
Autocorrelation M-M = 2*(X-X + CX-CX + XX-XX) + X-CX + CX-X + X-XX + X-XX + CX-XX + XX-CX:
Time (ns)0
Hennessy et al., Nature (2007)
+…=
CX-CX1
0
X-X1
0
XX-XX1
0
1
0
CX-XX1
0
CX-X1
0
XX-X
g(2)(0) ≠ 0 Symmetry of the M-M correlation histogram
↔
1
0
M-M
M-M
Interpretation of the single photon correlation results