Polyprotic Acids and Bases - Politechnika Gdańska · Polyprotic Acids and Bases . Tadeusz Górecki...
Transcript of Polyprotic Acids and Bases - Politechnika Gdańska · Polyprotic Acids and Bases . Tadeusz Górecki...
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 64
Phosphoric acid
HPOHPOH 4243 ][
]][[
43
421
POH
POHHKa
23.21 apK
HHPOPOH 2442
][
]][[
42
2
42
POH
HPOHKa 21.72 apK
HPOHPO 34
24
][
]][[2
4
3
43
HPO
POHKa 32.123 apK
Structure of phosphoric acid molecule:
P
OH
OH
OH
O
Pyrophosphoric acid:
P
OH
O
OH
O P
OH
OH
O
Dependence of equilibrium constant on ionic strength:
For H3PO4:
0
1
043
4201
][
][][
aa KPOH
POHHK
)log()log( 0
0
11 aa pKpK
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 65
From Davies equation:
III
IpKpK aa 1.02.0
151.020
11
22
42
2240
2][
][][aa K
POH
HPOHK
)log( 20
22
aa pKpK
I
I
IpKpK aa 2.0
151.040
22
The constant factor b can be adjusted to get better agreement.
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 66
2
33
224
3340
3][
][][
aa K
HPO
POHK
)log()log( 23
0
33 aa pKpK
I
I
IpKpK aa 2.0
151.060
33
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 68
Fraction (degree) of dissociation (ionization)
Weak monoprotic acid:
][
][
HK
K
C
A
a
a
HA
][
][][1
HK
H
C
HA
aHA
Polyprotic acids: n , where n is the number of protons that the acid has lost.
Monoprotic acid:
][
][0
HK
H
a
][1
HK
K
a
a
Diprotic acid H2S:
HSHSH2 ][
]][[
2
1SH
HSHKa
2SHHS ][
]][[ 2
2
HS
SHKa
CCCSHSSHC 2102
2 ][][][
C
SH ][ 20
C
HS ][1
C
S ][ 2
2
0
1
0
1
2
1
][][
][
]][[
H
C
CH
SH
HSHKa thus
][
101
H
Ka
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 69
1
22
2
][
][
]][[
H
HS
SHKa thus
2
210
212
][][
H
KK
H
K aaa
Obviously, n
n 1 , hence
1][][ 2
210
100
H
KK
H
K aaa
From this
2112
2
0][][
][
aaa KKHKH
H
2112
11
][][
][
aaa
a
KKHKH
HK
2112
212
][][ aaa
aa
KKHKH
KK
Rules for writing expressions:
1. The denominator for each in a component system HnB is identical.
2. The denominator is a decreasing power series of [H+], starting with [H
+]
n,
and ending with [H+]
0(=1). In each successive term, and additional stepwise
dissociation constant becomes a factor. There is a total of n+1 terms, in
which the last term is anaa KKK ...21 .
3. Since each term in the denominator is proportional to the concentration of a
particular species, the first term [H+]
n forms the numerator for 0 ,
11 ][ n
a HK for 1 , and so on. Thus, n has anaa KKK ...1 21 as the
numerator.
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 70
Equilibrium diagram plotted using expressions:
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-][H+]
[H3PO4] [H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-] [PO4
3-]
Species distribution diagram:
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
Fra
cti
on
al co
mp
osit
ion
H3PO4 H2PO4-
HPO42-
PO43-
0 1 2 3
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 71
Compact distribution diagram:
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
Alp
ha
H3PO4 H2PO4-
HPO42-
PO43-
First line represents 0 , second 10 , third 210 .
Finding pH from equilibrium diagrams:
Proton condition must be fulfilled.
1. H3PO4
][][3][2][][ 34
2442
OHPOHPOPOHH
From the diagram:
][][ 42 POHH
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 72
H3PO4
2.3
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-]
[H+]
[H3PO4] [H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-] [PO43-]
Numerical solution:
321212
13
21
142][][][
][][
aaaaaa
a
KKKHKKHKH
HCKCPOH
Proton condition
][][ 42 POHH
Thus
321212
13
21
][][][
][][
aaaaaa
a
KKKHKKHKH
HCKH
Neglecting the last two terms in the denominator:
112 ][][ aa CKHKH
Solution: pH = 2.278
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 73
Solution can also be found through iteration of:
])[(][ 12 HCKH a
2. NaH2PO4
Proton condition:
][][2][][][ 34
2443
OHPOHPOPOHH
From the diagram
][][][ 2443 HPOPOHH
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 74
NaH2PO4
4.8
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-][H+]
[H3PO4] [H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-] [PO43-]
Numerical solution:
][][][ 2443 HPOPOHH
Thus
][
][]][[][ 422
1
42
H
POHK
K
POHHH a
a
][][
1][ 422
1
422
POHK
K
POHH a
a
][
][][
421
42212
POHK
POHKKH
a
aa
From the diagram, in the region where the proton condition is fulfilled,
CPOH ][ 42 , thus:
CK
CKKH
a
aa
1
212][
which yields pH = 4.82
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 75
3. Na2HPO4
Proton condition:
][][][][2][ 344243
OHPOPOHPOHH
In the region where ][ 24HPO is dominant (around pH = 10):
][][][ 3442
OHPOPOH
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 76
Na2HPO4
9.5
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-][H+]
[H3PO4] [H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-] [PO43-]
Numerical solution:
][][][ 3442
OHPOPOH
Thus
][][
][]][[243
2
24
H
K
H
HPOK
K
HPOH wa
a
][][
24
232
2
HPO
KKKKH wa
aa
From the diagram, in the region where the proton condition is fulfilled,
CHPO ][ 24 , thus:
C
KKKKH wa
aa2
322][
which yields pH = 9.52.
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 77
4. Na3PO4
Proton condition:
][][][2][3][ 244243
OHHPOPOHPOHH
In the region where ][ 34PO is dominant (around pH = 13):
][][ 24
OHHPO
Na3PO4
11.9
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-][H+]
[H3PO4] [H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-] [PO43-]
Numerical solution:
][][ 24
OHHPO
From the diagram:
CPOHPO ][][ 34
24
][
][][
2433
4
H
HPOKPO
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 78
Thus
CH
KHPO a
][1][ 32
4
3
24
][
][][
aKH
HCHPO
From the proton condition:
][][
][
3
H
K
KH
HC w
a
][][ 32 HK
C
KH a
w
which yields pH = 11.88.
Sketching equilibrium diagrams for polyprotic acids by hand
4-hydroxybenzoic acid
MC BH310
2
3.41 apK
4.92 apK
2112
2
02][][
][][
aaa KKHKH
HCCBH
2112
11
][][
][][
aaa
a
KKHKH
HKCCHB
2112
212
2
][][][
aaa
aa
KKHKH
KKCCB
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 79
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
pH
log
C
Line for [H2B]:
1. pH < pKa1 < pKa2
CBH ][ 2
CBH log]log[ 2
0]log[ 2
pHd
BHd
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 80
2. pKa1 < pH < pKa2
2112
2
2][][
][][
aaa KKHKH
HCBH
][1 HKa , hence 2
1 ][][ HHKa
2][ aKH , hence 211 ][ aaa KKHK . Thus:
11
2
2
][
][
][][
aa K
HC
HK
HCBH
1
12
log
log]log[log]log[
a
a
pKpHC
KHCBH
1]log[ 2
pHd
BHd
3. pKa1 < pKa2 < pH
2112
2
2][][
][][
aaa KKHKH
HCBH
][21 HKK aa , hence 2
121 ][][ HHKKK aaa
Thus:
21
2
2
][][
aa KK
HCBH
21
212
2log
loglog]log[2log]log[
aa
aa
pKpKpHC
KKHCBH
2]log[ 2
pHd
BHd
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 81
Line for [HB-]:
2112
1
][][
][][
aaa
a
KKHKH
HKCHB
1. pH < pKa1 < pKa2
][][
][][ 1
2
1
H
CK
H
HCKHB aa
pHpKC
HKCHB
a
a
1
1
log
]log[loglog]log[
1]log[
pHd
HBd
2. pKa1 < pH < pKa2
0]log[
pHd
HBd
3. pKa1 < pKa2 < pH
1]log[
pHd
HBd
Line for [B2-
]:
1. pH < pKa1 < pKa2
2]log[ 2
pHd
Bd
2. pKa1 < pH < pKa2
1]log[ 2
pHd
Bd
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 82
3. pKa1 < pKa2 < pH
0]log[ 2
pHd
Bd
Slopes of the lines for a diprotic acid
Species pH < pKa1 < pKa2 pKa1 < pH < pKa2 pKa1 < pKa2 < pH
[H2B] 0 -1 -2
[HB-] 1 0 -1
[B2-
] 2 1 0
Note: sections having slopes of 2 and -2 are usually unimportant, because they
occur at extremely low concentrations!
When Ka values are spread widely:
1
2][
][][
aKH
HCAH
21
1
][
][
][][
aa
a
KH
HC
KH
KCHA
2
22
][][
a
a
KH
KCA
Does not apply when the pKa values are close.
Example: Pyrophosphoric acid H4P2O7
pKa1 = 0.91 pKa2 = 2.10 pKa3 = 6.70 pKa4 = 9.32
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 83
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-] [H+]
[H4P2O7]
[H3P2O7-]
[H2P2O72-]
[HP2O73-]
[P2O74-]
Proton condition:
][][4][3][2][][ 4
72
3
72
2
722723
OHOPOHPOPHOPHH
1.1
-5
-4.5
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
pH
log
C
[H+]
[H4P2O7]
[H3P2O7-]
[H2P2O72-]
[HP2O73-]
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 84
What is the pH of 0.1 M NaH3P2O7 (NaH3A)?
Proton condition:
][][3][2][][][ 4
72
3
72
2
722724
OHOPOHPOPHOPHH
From the equilibrium diagram:
][][][ 2
24
AHAHH
4321321
2
21
3
1
4
4
4][][][][
][][
aaaaaaaaaa KKKKHKKKHKKHKH
HCAH
Neglecting the last two terms in the denominator (corresponding to [HA3-
] and
[A4-
]:
211
2
2
4][][
][][
aaa KKHKH
HCAH
Similarly,
211
2
1
3][][
][][
aaa
a
KKHKH
HCKAH
211
2
212
2][][
][aaa
aa
KKHKH
KCKAH
Combined with the approximate proton condition:
0][)(][][ 21211
23
aaaaa KCKHKKCKHH
2
21
211
23
][
][][][
HKK
HKKKHHC
aa
aaa
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 85
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10pH
C
pH = 1.74
Asymptote
pH = 1.51
Mixtures of polyprotic acids and bases
Same principle, same technique. Use overlaid equilibrium diagrams and proton
conditions for the mixtures.
Example: 0.1 M solution of (NH4)2HPO4
Two systems: H3PO4 (0.1 M) and NH3 (0.2 M!)
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 86
Proton condition:
][][][][][2][ 3
434243
OHPONHPOHPOHH
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-][H+]
[H3PO4]
[H2PO4-]
[HPO42-]
[PO43-]
[NH4+] [NH3]
8.1
-5.5
-4.5
-3.5
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
6 7 8 9 10 11
pH
log
C
[OH-]
[H3PO4]
[H2PO4-] [HPO4
2-]
[PO43-]
[NH4+] [NH3]
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 87
Degree of formation n
Average number of protons bound to the acid anion. For H3PO4:
C
POHPOHHPOn
][3][2][ 4342
2
4
Using fractions of ionization:
012 32 n
Degree of dissociation: nN , where N is the maximum number of protons
that can be bound to the acid. For H3PO4, N = 3, hence the degree of
dissociation is n3 :
)32()(3133 0123210 nn
123 233 n
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
n 3-n
H3PO4
H2PO4-
HPO42-
PO43-
When the pKa values are less separated (e.g. for pyrophosphoric acid):
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 88
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
pH
n
H4A
H3A-
H2A2-
Titration of a polyprotic acid with a strong base
Charge balance: ][][3][2][][][ 32
2
OHAHAAHNaH
Mass balance:
ba
bb
VV
VCNa
][
Mass balance:
k
k
ba
aa AHVV
VCAHAAHAH ][][][][][ 32
23
k
k AH
AH
][
][ 21 , hence
ba
aa
k
kVV
VCAHAH 112 ][][ , etc.
Thus:
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 89
][
32][ 321
H
K
VV
VC
VV
VCH w
ba
aa
ba
bb
Monoprotic acid:
][][ 1
H
K
VV
VC
VV
VCH w
ba
aa
ba
bb
For H3PO4, we can also write:
][
3][
H
K
VV
VCn
VV
VCH w
ba
aa
ba
bb
Fraction titrated
aa
bb
VC
VC
Iterative form: ][][3
HOHVC
VVn
aa
ba
Non-iterative form: ][][
][][3
HOHC
HOHn
a
In both cases, when C is large compared to [H+] and [OH
-], n 3
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 90
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
3-n
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4
pH
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 91
Titration error
1.. epeT (first equivalence point)
Near the equivalence point,
ba
ba
aa
ba
CC
CC
VC
VV
Also, 0232)()3(13 nnn
Thus
ep
ep
w
ba
ba
epep HH
K
CC
CC][
][21 023
At the second equivalence point, 2 , and the titration error is given by
2ep:
ep
ep
w
ba
ba
epep HH
K
CC
CC][
][
222 013
Systems involving gas phase
CO2:
.)()(22
aqCOgasCO 2
.)]([2 COH
PKaqCO 464.1H
pK
32
.)( HCOHaqCO .)]([
]][[
2
3
1
aqCO
HCOHK
a
363.61
apK
2
33COHHCO
][
]][[
3
2
3
2
HCO
COHK
a 329.10
2
apK
The second reaction is often broken into two steps:
3222.)( COHOHaqCO .)]([][
2
†
32aqCOKCOH 97.2† Kp
332
HCOHCOH ][
]][[
32
3
1
†
COH
HCOHK
38.31
† Kp
Tadeusz Górecki Ionic Equilibria
Page 92
At equilibrium, [H2CO3] is only 0.1% of [CO2(aq.)], and can be neglected in
equilibrium calculations.
5.7
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
log
C
[OH-] [H+]
[CO2(aq)]
[HCO3-]
[CO32-
]
-8.5
-7.5
-6.5
-5.5
-4.5
-3.5
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
3 5 7 9 11
pH
log
C
[OH-] [H+]
[CO2(aq)]
[HCO3-]
[CO32-
]
CT
"true"[H2CO3]