Nike inc.case 27
-
Upload
rashadanwaar -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Nike inc.case 27
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
1/19
Nike, Inc. - 2009Case Notes Prepared by: Dr. Mernoush Banton
Case uthor: Randy Harris
A. Case Abstract
Nike, Inc. !""".nike.co#$ is a co#prehensi%e strate&ic #ana&e#ent case thatinc'udes the co#pany(s )isca' May *+st, 2009 )inancia' state#ents, co#petitorin)or#ation and #ore. he case ti#e settin& is the year 2009. u))icient interna'and eterna' data are pro%ided to enab'e students to e%a'uate current strate&iesand reco##end a three-year strate&ic p'an )or the co#pany. /eaduartered inBea%erton !Be%artn$, 1re&on, Nike is traded on the Ne" ork tock 3chan&eunder ticker sy#bo' N43.
B. Vision Statement !ctua'$
5Brin& inspiration and inno%ation to e%ery ath'ete in the "or'd.6
C. Mission Statement !ctua'$
5o be the 'eadin& sports brand in the "or'd.6
Mission Statement !Proposed$
s the 'ar&est se''er o) ath'etic )oot"ear and ath'etic appare' in the "or'd !2, *$,"e create products )or consu#ers and ath'etics !+$ "ho en7oy ha%in& ua'ity
products that are hi&h per)or#ance and re'iab'e such as shoes, appare', andtechno'o&ica''y ad%anced euip#ent$ !8$. 1ur dedicated e#p'oyees !9$continuous'y "ork on de%e'opin& ne" products, price, and product identitythrou&h #arketin& and pro#otion !$. he co#pany ai#s to 'ead in corporatecitienship !;$ throu&h proacti%e pro&ra#s that re)'ect carin& )or the "or'd )a#i'yo) Nike !
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
2/19
D. External Audit
CPM Competitive Profile Matrix
Nie Adidas Puma
Critical Success !actors "ei#$t%atin
#"ei#$ted
Score%atin
#"ei#$ted
Score%atin
#"ei#$ted
Score
Price co#petiti%eness 0.+0 * 0.*0 2 0.20 + 0.+0
?'oba' 3pansion 0.0 8 0.2; * 0.2+ 2 0.+8
1r&aniationa' tructure 0.08 * 0.+2 + 0.08 + 0.08
echno'o&y 0.09 * 0.2 + 0.09 2 0.+;
Product a)ety 0.+= 2 0.*0 * 0.8= 8 0.
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
3/19
taste, are enab'e to achie%e considerab'y better pricin& as "e'' as5deepenin&6 the e#otiona' bond consu#ers ha%e "ith the brand
&$reats
+. )ter the a&e o) 80, the typica' consu#er is not "i''in& to pay #ore thanG*= to G80 per pair )or ath'etic )oot"ear2. Co#petition is stron& a#on& ath'etic )oot"ear and appare' )ro# o)) brand
co#panies*. 'uctuation o) )orei&n currency i#pacts the cost o) i#portin& &oods to the
E..8. Increase in une#p'oy#ent has i#pacted the househo'd inco#e "hich
#ay resu't in spendin& 'ess on brand na#e=. Barrier to entry is 'o" 20++ Pearson 3ducation, Inc. pub'ishin& as Prentice /a''.
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
4/19
taste, are enab'e to achie%e considerab'y betterpricin& as "e'' as deepenin& the e#otiona' bondconsu#ers ha%e "ith the brand
&$reats
+. )ter the a&e o) 80, the typica' consu#er is not
"i''in& to pay #ore than G*= to G80 per pair )orath'etic )oot"ear
0.0 * 0.2+
2. Co#petition is stron& a#on& ath'etic )oot"ear andappare' )ro# o)) brand co#panies
0.0; 2 0.+ 20++ Pearson 3ducation, Inc. pub'ishin& as Prentice /a''.
C
3
I
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
14/19
-ais: 3 *.; !-8.
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
15/19
3. &$e 3nternal;External 3E/ Matrix
&$e 3!E &otal "ei#$ted Score
tron&
*.0 to 8.0
%era&e
2.0 to 2.99
Feak
+.0 to +.99
/i&h*.0 to *.99
I II III
Mediu#2.0 to 2.99
IK IK
Nie> 3nc.
KI
@o"+.0 to +.99
KII KIII IO
?. @SPM
Increasead%ertisin&
andpro#otionthrou&hsocia'
net"orkin&such as
"itter andacebook
cuire a 'essepensi%ebrand o)
accessoriesand
sports"earand pro#otethe# as ano)) brand o)
Nike0e1 !actors "ei#$t AS &AS AS &AS
-pportunities
Copyri&ht > 20++ Pearson 3ducation, Inc. pub'ishin& as Prentice /a''.
&$e E!E &otal"ei#$ted
Score
-
8/12/2019 Nike inc.case 27
16/19
+. oun&er consu#ers are 'ess price sensiti%eand &enera''y spend #ore on casua' andath'etic )oot"ear than o'der consu#ers
0.0; + 0.0; 8 0.*2
2. Most )oot"ear co#panies ha%e outsourcedtheir production abroad in order to #aintain'o"er cost and D epenses
0.0 --- --- --- ---
*. E )oot"ear i#ports tota'ed 2.*< bi''ionpairs in 200, or rou&h'y .9 pairs per capita"hich is "as up 0.8 percent )ro# 200