T036 UK V2 Copia Copia

8/21/2019 T036 UK V2 Copia Copia

1/19

Dutch Accreditation Council page 4 of 14T036-UK, version 2 version:25-2-2014

1 Introduction

On 1 July 2012, the standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012 Conformity assessment – General requirements for

bodies operating certification of persons has been published. According to the decisions of the

International Accreditat ion Forum (IAF), ISO/IEC 17024: 2012 replaces the standard ISO/IEC 17024:

2003 "Conformity assessment – General requirements for bodies operating certification of persons" for

accreditation of certification of persons.

The publication of this international standard includes several changes from the ISO/IEC 17024: 2003.

The changes are both new texts that add new requirements, changes of existing texts of ISO/IEC

17204: 2003 into other requirements, and reformulation of requirements, as well as deleting

requirements from ISO/IEC 17024: 2003 in the newly published standard.

This explanatory note describes the policy and method of the RvA for the implementation of ISO/IEC17024:2012. With this document RvA implements the policy of IAF. IAF will publish an "Information

Document for the Transition or ISO/IEC 17024".

This explanatory document is applicable for all bodies, which are until now accredited or accepted

under ISO/IEC 17024:2003, as well as bodies who have requested or going to request accreditation

regarding ISO/IEC 17024, and scheme owners who requested or going to request acceptance

regarding ISO/IEC 17024.

Bodies which certify persons under accreditation must comply with the requirements of the new

standard before the expiration of the transition period in order to maintain their accreditation.

Scheme owners which have accepted schemes for certification of persons must comply with the

requirements of the new standard before the expiration of the transition period in order to maintain

their acceptation.


2/19


Contents

1 Introduction__________________________________________________ 4

2

Transition to ISO/IEC 17024:2012 ________________________________ 5

2.1 General _____________________________________________________ 5

2.2 RvA assessment of the transition to ISO/IEC 17024:2012_____________ 5

2.2.1 Time lim its an d data con cernin g the transit ion to ISO /IEC 17024:2012 ___ 5

2.2.2 A ccreditat ion asses sments ______________________________________ 6

2.3 Nonconformities against the new requirements ____________________ 6

2.4 Valid guidance documents and explanatory documents _____________ 6

2.5 Accreditation statement ________________________________________ 7

2.6

Information __________________________________________________ 7

3 Changes compared to the previous version _______________________ 7

Annex A: Summary of changes _______________________________________ 8


3/19

Raad voor Accreditatie(Dutch Accreditation CouncilRvA)

Implementation of

ISO/IEC 17024:2012

Document code: RvA-T036-UK

Version 2, 25 februari 2014


4/19


based on ISO/IEC 17024:2012.

2.2.2 Accreditation assessments

The accredited certification bodies are expected to perform an analysis regarding the differences

between the ISO/IEC 17024:2003 and ISO/IEC 17024:2012 (a gap analysis) to determine to what

extent they comply with the requirements of the new standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012 (including the use

of internal auditing) and where necessary, to draw up and implement an action plan so they will

comply with the ISO/IEC 17024:2012, taking into account 2.2.1 and 2.3 of this explanatory note.

The accreditation assessment to assess the implementation of the new standard will be carried out

during regular accreditation assessment, and will consist of:

document reviews of the management system documentation of the body;

review of documents of the certification scheme(s) (Note: where a scheme of an accepted schemaowner is used, the certification scheme will not be assessed at each individual certification body.);

assessment at the office of the certification body;

possibly a witness of an exam.

2.3 Nonconformities against the new requirements

All nonconformities against requirements of the ISO/IEC 17024:2012 that would not have been

nonconformities from requirements of ISO/IEC 17024:2003 will be categorizes as "(B)". This concerns

the requirements indicated as “new” in annex A of this explanation. The certification body has the

opportunity to take corrective actions until January 1, 2015 and submit a report on these to the RvA

(see RvA-BR004). The RvA shall assess these corrective actions before 1 April 2015, and take

accreditation decisions before 1 July 2015.

If the RvA is not able to take a posit ive decision before 1 July 2015 concerning the granting of

accreditation for ISO/IEC 17024:2012, due to the inability to close off the nonconformities, the

accreditation will be suspended for a maximum of three months, The accreditation shall be withdrawn

after this period of suspension if the nonconformities have not been resolved.

2.4 Valid guidance documents and explanatory documents

During the transitional period the IAF GD24: 2009 remains the guidance for ISO/IEC 17024:2003 as

long as the accreditation is granted for ISO/IEC 17024:2003.

In due time the RvA will adapt the current documents that apply to accreditation of certification of

persons, such as the Specific Accreditation Protocol (SAP C014) Accreditation of certification of

persons (general). Until then the present documents will be valid.


5/19

An Rv A explanatory note describes the Rv A policy and/or procedure relating to a spec if ic f ield of

accreditation. If the policy and/or procedure f or a specif ic f ield of acc reditation, as described in an Rv A

explanatory note, is recorded in an EA, ILAC or IAF document, the Rv A shall amend its policy and procedureto align with this EA, ILAC or IAF document.

A current v ersion of the explanatory note can be found on the Rv A website (www.rva.nl).

http://www.rva.nl/http://www.rva.nl/http://www.rva.nl/http://www.rva.nl/


6/19


2 Transition to ISO/IEC 17024:2012

2.1 General

IAF has decided that the transitional period for the transition of accreditation of certification of personsfrom ISO/IEC 17024:2003 to accreditat ion according to ISO/IEC 17024:2012 is three years after

publication of the new standard. The new standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012 has been published on 1 July

2012. This means that starting from 1 July 2015 no accreditations against the withdrawn standard

ISO/IEC 17024:2003 may be valid any more.

The Chairman of ISO/CASCO WG 30, the Working Group that has prepared the text of the new

standard, has made public a presentation in which the amendments of the requirements in the new

standard with respect to the requirements mentioned in the previous standard are expressed. This

publication shows that the standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012 has been revised enormously. There arefundamental changes as well as many reformulations and additional requirements in the new

standard. (see http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_17024_2012_powerpoint.ppt ).

The RvA has, in line with IAF policy, decided that assessments regarding the transition to the new

standard will be carried out as much as possible with regular accreditation assessments. RvA has

defined the transitional provisions for the implementation of the ISO/IEC 17024:2012 as follows.

2.2 RvA assessment of the transition to ISO/IEC 17024:2012

2.2.1 Time limits and data concerning the transition to ISO/IEC 17024:2012

Regarding accredited certification bodies:

From 1 April 2013 onwards accreditation assessments at the accredited certification bodies will be

carried out against ISO/IEC 17024:2012, with the focus on the requirements which are – according to

the ISO publication referred to above – new requirements with respect to the requirements of the

withdrawn standard.

Nonconformities raised will be subject to the provisions for corrective actions, as described in section

2.3 of this document.

Regarding certification bodies that have applied for accreditation or that are going to apply:

From 1 July 2013 all applicat ions have to be made for ISO/IEC 17024:2012.

Regarding scheme owners:

Scheme owners with accepted schemes for certification of persons have to adjust their accepted

schemes in accordance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17024:2012 (see RvA-T33). Scheme

owners have the obligation to take into account the procedure for acceptance of schemes and the

transitional period for accredited certification bodies.

From 1 July 2013 all applications for the assessment of new or revised schemes will be processed

http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_17024_2012_powerpoint.ppthttp://www.iso.org/iso/iso_17024_2012_powerpoint.ppthttp://www.iso.org/iso/iso_17024_2012_powerpoint.ppt


7/19


ISO/IEC 17024:2012 ISO/IEC 17024:2003 Status Comment

3.22 surveillance New

4 Generalrequirements

Newsection

4.1 Legal matters 4.2.1d Changed

4.2 Responsibilitydecision 4.2.1b Reworded

4.3 Management

impartiality

New

section

Impartiality may be achieved trough the

use of an Impartiality Committee orthrough other methods.Impartiality and objectivity are the

cornerstones for certification ofpersons. If the process for verifying thecompetence of persons is not impartial

and objective then there is no value tothe certification of persons.ISO/IEC PAS 17001 on impartiality is

included in clause 4.3.

4.3.1 4.2.2 Changed4.3.2 4.2.1a New ‘To be’ is replaced by ‘to act’ regarding

management of impartiality

4.3.3 4.1.1 New Related to management of impartiality

4.3.4 4.3.5 Same Only a part of 4.3.5 is mentioned in4.3.4

4.3.5 New

4.3.6 New

4.3.7 New

4.3.8 New Requirement concerns “certification

activities” instead of “certification body”

4.4 Finance adliability

4.2.4a Reworded

5 Structuralrequirements

Samesection

5.1 Management 4.2 Organization Changed

section

5.1.1 4.2.1 Changed Requirement concerns “certificationactivities” instead of “certification body”

5.1.2 4.2.1c Changed Additional parties to be identified added

5.1.2a New

5.1.2b 4.2.1c4 Same

5.1.2c 4.2.1c5 Same

5.1.2d New

5.1.2e New

5.1.2f 4.2.1c1 Same5.1.2g 4.2.1c3 Reworded

5.1.2h New

5.2 Structure Newsection

New section with more informationabout the structure of the certification

body in relation to training.Training is a threat to impartiality(5.2.3). Therefore the certification body

of persons must demonstrate theindependence of the certificationactivities from training activities to

ensure the confidentiality, informationsecurity and impartiality of the

certification activities are notcompromised (5.2.3b).


8/19


2.5 Accreditation statement

The declaration of accreditation (including the scope appendix) shall be amended to show the

accreditation against ISO/IEC 17024:2012, after an assessment against the new standard has been

completed successfully, and a decision on the granting, continuation, or renewal of accreditation has

been taken. For existing accreditations the registration number shall remain the same.

The date of the accreditation statement shall be the date of the decision on accreditation against the

new standard. The date of the first accreditation for the previously issued accreditation for certification

of persons (against ISO/IEC 17024 2003 or EN 45013) shall also be stated on the new accreditation

statements. The expiry date for the new accreditation shall be transferred from the existing

accreditation.

2.6 Information

For questions about the new standard ISO/IEC 17024:2012, please contact Mr . Paul Schröeder

([email protected]).

For questions about the transit ional provisions please contact Mrs. Maureen van den Wijngaart

([email protected]).

3 Changes compared to the previous version

None, this is the first version of this document in English.

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]


9/19


Annex A: Summary of changes

Amendments of the requirements of ISO/IEC 17024:2012 compared to ISO/IEC 17024:2003:

the standard ISO/IEC 17024:2003 has been revised drastically . The ISO/IEC 17024:2012 has a

different format, many new and some reworded requirements;

a limited number of requirements is not or not substantively changed from the version of ISO/IEC17024:2003.

The schematic overview of the comparison of ISO/IEC 17024:2012 with ISO/IEC 17024:2003 is alsobased on the comment of the Chairman of ISO/CASCO WG 30 on the new standard.

Explanation status:

Same means: identical text

Reworded means: in other words but equivalent requirements

Changed means: other words; other requirements

New means: new words and new requirements

New section means: in the new standard several sections have been reformatted: some textshave been are put together in other or new sections.


Title Title Same

Introduction Introduction Same Added: explanation of the terms “shall”,“should”, “may” and “can”

1 Scope 1 Scope Same Note added

2 Normativereferences

2 Normativereferences

Changed

3 Terms and

definitions

3 Terms and

definitions

Same

section

3.1 certification

process

3.3 certification

process

Reworded

3.2 certificationscheme

3.4 certificationscheme

Changed

3.3 certification

requirements

New

3.4 scheme owner New

3.5 certificate New

3.6 competence 3.6 competence Changed

3.7 qualification 3.11 qualification Reworded

3.8 assessment 3.8 evaluation New The term ”evaluation” has beenreplaced by the term “assessment” withabout the same content

3.9 examinat ion 3.9 examination Changed Added: reference to a certification

scheme

3.10 examiner 3.10 examiner Changed Added: reference to professional judgment

3.11 invigilator New

3.12 personnel New

3.13 applicant New

3.14 candidate 3.2 candidate Reworded

3.15 impartiality New

3.16 fairness New From IAF GD24

3.17 validity New From IAF GD24

3.18 reliability New From IAF GD24

3.19 appeal 3.1 appeal Same

3.20 complaint 3.7 complaint Reworded3.21 interested party New


10/19



threats associated with their certificationprograms.

7.4.1 New

7.4.2 New

7.4.2a New7.4.2b New

7.4.2c New

7.4.2d New

7.4.3a New

7.4.3b New

7.4.3c New

7.4.3d New

7.4.3e New

7.4.3f New

8 Certificationschemes

4.3 Newsection

More detailed description of certificationschemes. Now recognizing an external

scheme owner. Provides clauses

detailing the requirements for thecontents of a scheme (8.2), detailed

clauses for certification requirementsthat must be in a scheme (8.3), anddetailed requirements for the

development and review of thecertification scheme (8.4). Therequirement for a Job Task Analysis is

now included in the standard (8.4).Surveillance is now “if applicable” asbased on the scheme. Requires that the

scheme be reviewed and validated onan ongoing, systematic basis.

Development of the scheme was citedas one of the problematic areas. Thenew standard provides additionalinformation to clarify scheme

requirements.

8.1 New

8.2a New

8.2b New

8.2c New

8.2d New

8.2e New

8.2f New

8.3a New8.3b New

8.3c New

8.3d New

8.3e New

8.4a New

8.4b [4.2.3] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

8.4c New

8.4d New

8.4e New

8.5 New

8.6 New

9 Certification

process

6 Certification

process

Changed

section

More detail provided for the certification

process requirements, including theapplication process (9.1), assessment


11/19



6.3.2c 4.5.2c Changed

6.3.2d New

6.3.2e 4.5.2c Changed

6.4 Other resources New

7 Records andinformation Changedsection A certification body for persons mustcarefully balance information thatshould be available to the public with

and without request, and information tatmust be kept confidential.

7.1 Records persons Samesection

Applicant, candidate and certifiedpersons records section describes what

persons records must be stored.

7.1.1 4.6.1 Same

7.1.2 4.6.2 Same

7.1.3 4.7 New

7.2 Publicinformation

Newsection

Public information section describesinformation that must be available both

with request and without request.ISO/IEC PAS 17004 on disclosure ofinformation included in clause 7.2.

7.2.1 New

7.2.2 New

7.2.3 New

7.2.4 New

7.3 Confidentiality Newsection

Confidentiality section provides clausesrelating to confidential data including

candidate data and examination data.ISO/IEC PAS 17002 on confidentialityincluded in clause 7.3.

7.3.1 New

7.3.2 [4.7] New Is considered to be a new requirement.7.3.3 [4.7] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

7.3.4 [4.7] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

7.3.5 [4.7] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

7.4 Security New

section

Includes clauses pertaining to the

security of confidential candidate data(personal information, etc.), andclauses pertaining to the security of

examination data (test questions,answers, exam papers, etc.).Requires the certification body to

develop security policies and

procedures that includes considerationof the location of the materials

(transport, storage, exam centers,destruction, digital etc.), the nature ofthe materials (electronic, paper, test

equipment, etc.), and the steps in thelife cycle of examinations (development,administration, results reporting, etc.).

The release of some confidentialinformation (such as examinationinformation) could result in the

invalidation of the entire certificationprogram. It is important that all

confidential and secure information iskept confidential. Many certificationbodies are unaware of the security


12/19



5.2.1 4.3.5 Same Only a part of 4.3.5 is mentioned in5.2.1

5.2.2 New

5.2.3 New

5.2.3a New5.2.3b [4.2.5] New Is considered to be a new requirement

5.2.3c New

5.2.3d New

5.2.3e New A trainer may not serve as an examinerof a specific candidate they have

trained for a period of 2 years (5.3.2e)unless the certification body candemonstrate how it does not

compromise impartiality.

6 Resourcerequirements

Changedsection

Note that Personnel definition (3.12)includes individuals internal or externalwho carry out activities for the

certification body.The competence of personnel isimportant to ensure that certification

activities are carried out correctly andimpartially.

6.1 Generalrequirements

5.1 General Changedsection

Clauses pertaining to competence,training and signing of conflict of

interest and confidentiality agreementsadded.

6.1.1 New

6.1.2 [4.2.7] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

6.1.3 5.1.1 Changed

6.1.4 5.1.3 Reworded

6.1.5 5.1.4 Reworded6.1.6 New


6.1.8 New

6.2 Personnel Newsection

6.2.1 General 5.2.1 New Is considered to be a new requirement.

6.2.2 Examiners Same

section

Clauses pertaining to competence,

impartiality, and declaration of conflictof interest added.

6.2.2.1 5.2.1 Same

6.2.2.1a 5.2.1 Reworded

6.2.2.1b 5.2.1 Reworded6.2.2.1c 5.2.1 Same

6.2.2.1d 5.2.1 Changed

6.2.2.1e 5.2.1 Reworded

6.2.2.2 New

6.2.2.3 5.2.2 Same

6.2.3 Otherpersonnel

Newsection

Added requirements for invigilators andexamination administrators.

6.2.3.1 New

6.2.3.2 New

6.3 Outsourcing Changed

section

Includes contracted and subcontracted

services.

6.3.1 4.5.1 Changed

6.3.2a 4.5.2a Changed6.3.2b 4.5.2b Changed


13/19



process (9.2), examination process(9.3), decision on certification (9.4),suspending, withdrawing or reducing

the scope of certification (9.5),recertification process (9.6) and the useof certificates, logos and marks (9.7).

Additional detail was required to makethe clauses and requirements clear.

9.1 Applicationprocess

6.1 Application Samesection

9.1.1 6.1.1 Changed

9.1.2 6.1.2 Changed

9.1.2a 6.1.2 Changed

9.1.2b 6.1.2 Same

9.1.2c 6.1.2 Same

9.1.2d 6.1.2 Changed

9.1.2e New

9.1.3 [6.2.1] New Is considered to be a new requirement.9.2 Assessment

process

Changed

section

9.2.1 New

9.2.2 4.3.3 Changed


9.2.4 New

9.2.5 6.2.1 New

9.2.6 New

9.3 Examinationprocess

Newsection

9.3.1 6.2.2 Changed Added text to address equating of examforms and comparability of the pass/fail

decision

9.3.2 New To address exam administrationstandardization

9.3.3 New To address exam administrationstandardization

9.3.4 New

9.3.5 4.3.6 Changed

9.4 Decision on

certification

6.3 Decision on

certification

Same

section

9.4.1 New

9.4.1a New

9.4.1b New

9.4.2 4.5.1 Changed9.4.3 4.1.3 Reworded

9.4.4 6.3.1 Same

9.4.5 New

9.4.6 New

9.4.7 6.3.2 Same

9.4.8a 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8b 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8c 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8d 6.3.3 Changed

9.4.8e 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8f 6.3.3 Same

9.4.9 New

9.5 Suspension,withdrawing

Newsection


14/19



9.5.1 New

9.5.2 New

9.5.3 New

9.5.4 New

9.6 Recertificationprocess 6.5 Recertificat ion Changedsection

9.6.1 6.5.2 Changed

9.6.2 6.5.1 & 6.5.2 Changed

9.6.3 New

9.6.3a New

9.6.3b New

9.6.3c New

9.6.3d New

9.6.3e New

9.6.3f New

9.6.3g New

9.6.3h New

9.6.4 6.5.2 Reworded9.6.5a New

9.6.5b New

9.6.5c New

9.6.5d New

9.6.5e New

9.6.5f New

9.7 Use ofcertificates, marks

Use of certificates,marks

Samesection

9.7.1 6.6.1 Same

9.7.2 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2a 6.6.3 Same

9.7.2b 6.6.2 Same9.7.2c 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2d 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2e 6.6.2 Same

9.7.3 6.6.3 Changed

9.8 Appeals [4.2.6] New

section

New appeals section.

ISO/IEC PAS 17003 on appealsincluded in clause 9.8.

9.8.1 [4.2.6]] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

9.8.1a New

9.8.1b New

9.8.1c New


9.8.3 New


9.8.5 New

9.8.6 New

9.8.7 New

9.9 Complaints [4.2.6] Newsection

New complaints section.ISO/IEC PAS 17003 on complaints

included in clause 9.9.


9.9.2 New


9.9.3a New

9.9.3b New9.9.3c New


15/19



9.9.4 New

9.9.5 New

9.9.6 New

9.9.7 New

9.9.8 New9.9.9 New

9.9.10 New

10 Managementsystem

Newsection

New management system requirementssection.ISO/IEC PAS 17005 on use of

management systems included inclause 10.

10.1 General [4.4.1] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

10.2 Generalrequirements

Newsection

10.2.1 General [4.4.2] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

10.2.2

Documentation

New

10.2.3 Control ofdocuments

[4.4.3] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

10.2.3a New

10.2.3b New

10.2.3b New

10.2.3c New

10.2.3d New

10.2.3e New

10.2.3f New

10.2.3g New

10.2.4 Control ofrecords

New

10.2.5 Management

review

New

10.2.5.1 General [4.4.3] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

10.2.5.2 Reviewinput

New

10.2.5.2a New

10.2.5.2b New

10.2.5.2c New

10.2.5.2d New

10.2.5.2e New

10.2.5.2f New

10.2.5.2g New

10.2.5.2h New10.2.5.3 Reviewoutput

New

10.2.5.3a New

10.2.5.3b New

10.2.5.3c New

10.2.6 Internal audits New

section

10.2.6.1 [4.4.3] New Is considered to be a new requirement.

10.2.6.2 New

10.2.6.3 New

10.2.6.4a New

10.2.6.4b New10.2.6.4c New

10.2.6.4d New


16/19



10.2.6.4e New

10.2.7 Correctiveactions


10.2.7a New

10.2.7b New10.2.7c New

10.2.7d New

10.2.7e New

10.2.7f New

10.2.7g New

10.2.8 Preventiveactions


10.2.8a New

10.2.8b New

10.2.8c New

10.2.8d New

10.2.8e New

Annex A(informative)

New Principles section added in Annex A.Includes principles associated withimpartiality, competence, confidentialityand openness, responsiveness to

complaints and appeals, andresponsibility.The revised standard cannot give

specific requirements for all situationsthat can occur. The principles aredesigned to be able as guidance for

unanticipated situations. The principlesserve as the framework for the entirestandard.

Bibliography Changed


17/19


The following sect ions from ISO/IEC 17024:2003 are not inherited in ISO/IEC 17024:2012:


4.1.1 - Deleted

4.1.2 - Deleted

4.2.1a - Deleted

4.2.3 - Deleted

4.3.1 - Deleted

4.3.4 - Deleted

6.2.1 - Deleted

6.2.4 - Deleted

6.4.1 - Deleted

6.4.2 - Deleted

6.5.1 - Deleted


18/19


Of the mandatory requirements (the 'shall' requirements) in IAF GD24:2009 some are included inISO/IEC 17024:2012. The overview is as follows:

IAF GD24:2009 ISO/IEC 17024:2003 Status Comment

G.4.2.1 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012.

G.4.2.3 - Not included explicitly in ISO/IEC17024:2012. However, see ISO/IEC17024:2012, section 4.1 (status) and

section 5.1 (structure).

G.4.2.8 4.3.7 Changed See ISO/IEC 17024:2012, section 4.3.7;see also 4.3.6.



G.4.2.13 9.8.4 Changed


G.4.2.20 6.2.1 Reworded

G.4.2.22 6.1.16.4

RewordedReworded

G.4.2.26 5.2.2 RewordedG.4.2.28 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012.

G.4.2.30 9.9.3c Changed

G.4.3.2 8.4e Reworded

G.4.7.1 - Not included explicitly in ISO/IEC

17024:2012. Hoewever, see: ISO/IEC17024:2012, sections 6.3.2.b and 6.1.7



G.5.1.2 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012. G.5.2.3 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012. G.6.2.1 - Not included explicitly in ISO/IEC

17024:2012. However, see: ISO/IEC

17024:2012, section 9.2.5.

G.6.3.3 9.4.5 Changed

G.6.3.4 9.4.6 Reworded


G.6.3.6 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012. G.6.3.7 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012. G.6.5.3 - Not included in ISO/IEC 17024:2012.




19/19

Dutch Accreditation Council page 19 of 14

A brief overview of the requirements, which are not substantively changed, is :

ISO/IEC 17024:2012 ISO/IEC 17024:2003 Status

4.2 4.2.1b Reworded

4.3.4 4.3.5 Same4.4 4.2.4a Reworded


5.1.2b 4.2.1c4 Same

5.1.2c 4.2.1c5 Same

5.1.2f 4.2.1c1 Same

5.1.2g 4.2.1c3 Reworded

5.2.1 4.3.5 Same


6.1.5 5.1.4 Reworded6.1.7 5.1.2 Reworded

6.2.2.1 5.2.1 Same

6.2.2.1a 5.2.1 Reworded

6.2.2.1b 5.2.1 Reworded

6.2.2.1c 5.2.1 Same

6.2.2.1e 5.2.1 Reworded

6.2.2.3 5.2.2 Same

7.1.1 4.6.1 Same

7.1.2 4.6.2 Same9.1.2b 6.1.2 Same

9.1.2c 6.1.2 Same



9.4.4 6.3.1 Same

9.4.7 6.3.2 Same

9.4.8a 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8b 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8c 6.3.3 Same9.4.8e 6.3.3 Same

9.4.8f 6.3.3 Same

9.7.1 6.6.1 Same

9.7.2 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2a 6.6.3 Same

9.7.2b 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2c 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2d 6.6.2 Same

9.7.2e 6.6.2 Same

T036 UK V2 Copia Copia

Documents

Transcript of T036 UK V2 Copia Copia