R. ShuchmanD. PozdnyakovG. Leshkevich C. HattA. Korosov AltarumNIERSCNOAA GLERL
description
Transcript of R. ShuchmanD. PozdnyakovG. Leshkevich C. HattA. Korosov AltarumNIERSCNOAA GLERL
www.altarum.org
Verification and Application of aVerification and Application of aBio-optical Algorithm for Lake Michigan Bio-optical Algorithm for Lake Michigan using SeaWiFS:using SeaWiFS:a Seven-year Inter-annual Analysisa Seven-year Inter-annual Analysis
Remote Sensing Across the Great Lakes: Remote Sensing Across the Great Lakes: Observations, Monitoring and ActionObservations, Monitoring and Action
April 4-6, 2006, Rochester, NYApril 4-6, 2006, Rochester, NY
R. Shuchman D. Pozdnyakov G. LeshkevichC. Hatt A. Korosov
Altarum NIERSC NOAA GLERL
2www.altarum.org
OutlineOutline
Water Quality Retrieval Algorithm Overview Algorithm Validation Example Results for Lake Michigan Climate Change Modeling
3www.altarum.org
Water Quality Retrieval AlgorithmWater Quality Retrieval Algorithm
Uses any visible spectrum sensing satellite Detects spatial and temporal patterns in inland water
bodies, including extreme and episodic events Partnership between
– Altarum Institute– Nansen International Environmental and Remote Sensing
Centre (NIERSC)– NOAA GLERL– University of Michigan / Western Michigan University
4www.altarum.org
Retrievables: Color Producing Agents (CPAs)
– concentrations of phytoplankton chlorophyll (CHL)– suspended minerals (SM)– dissolved organic matter (DOC)
Specific features: Satellite- and water body-non-specific Based on a hydro-optical model: Specific backscattering and
absorption coefficients of CHL, SM and DOC Combines Neural Networks with a Levenberg-Marquardt multivariate
optimization procedure – the combination renders the algorithm computationally operational
Possesses quality assurance– Removal of pixels with poor atmospheric correction
(SeaWiFS/MODIS standard procedures are applicable)– Removal of pixels that cannot be characterized by the hydro-optical model
Water Quality Retrieval AlgorithmWater Quality Retrieval Algorithm
5www.altarum.org
Algorithm Flow ChartAlgorithm Flow Chart
Calculationof
Module of neural networksNN - 1
chl : 0 - 70 ug/l; sm: 0 - 25 mg/l; doc: 0 - 25 mgC/l;
NN - 2chl: 0 - 5;
NN - 3sm 0 - 5;
NN - 4doc 0 - 5;
Computation of ranges of starting Со
Levenberg - Marquardt multivariate optimization procedure
Assesment of adequacy of the applied hydrooptical
modelReconstruction of
Comparison ofR rsw2 with R rsw1
Hydrooptical model
C chl C sm C doc
Co
C chl
C
C doc
C
Atmospheric correction
Multispectral satellite image
Assesment of the quality of atmospheric correction
R rsw1
Selection of appropriate NN
chl < 5 sm < 5 doc < 5
Yes Yes YesNo No No
C chl C sm C doc
R rsw2
Definitive decision on the adequacy of retrieval results
Concentration vector for each pixel
C sm
ii Caa *
iibb Cbb *
),( brsw bafR
),,( docsmchl CCCfrswR
),,( 00 FnLfR wrsw 00 ,, FnL w
R rsw1
R rsw1
Establishing of flags
6www.altarum.org
Remote Sensing ReflectanceRemote Sensing Reflectance
:)0(uL
),,,( R )0()0( b
d
u baCfELS
},,{ docsmchl CCCC
}...{ *1
*1 iiCaCaa
}...{ *1
*1 jbjbb CbCbb
ni ...3,2,1
mj ...3,2,1
:ia Specific absorption coefficient for the ith water constituent
:bjb Specific backscattering coefficient for the jth water constituent
Upwelling spectral radiance at the water surface
:)0(dEDownwelling spectral irradiance at the water surface
Measured Modeled
7www.altarum.org
The Levenberg-Marquardt Multivariate The Levenberg-Marquardt Multivariate Optimization Procedure (1)Optimization Procedure (1)
= [ / ] measured reflectance at the
wavelength j (such as a measured from a satellite)
reconstructed remote sensing reflectance,
The residual between and can be computed by one of the following ways:
The multidimensional least-square solution using all wavelengths is found by minimizing the squares of the residuals:
),( bC, ba,fRrsw
),0( uL ),0( dEjS
jS jrswR
jrswjjj SRSg /)(
f g jj
( ) ( )C C 2
)},,{ docsmchl CCCC
8www.altarum.org
The Levenberg-Marquardt Multivariate The Levenberg-Marquardt Multivariate Optimization Procedure (2)Optimization Procedure (2)
The absolute minimum of f(C) can be found with the Levenberg-Marquardt finite difference algorithm.
An iteration procedure is initiated by creating an array of initial guess values C0. Each initial guess value is adjusted so that f(C) approaches a minimum. The value of C that provides the smallest f(C) can be determined to be the solution to the inverse problem.
The number N of the initial vectors should not be excessively high because the computation time for the inverse problem solution increases proportionally with N.
But the use of an array of initial vectors does not guarantee that the iterative procedure be converging, or/and the eventually established concentration vector be realistic. To help avoid this outcome and to speed up the algorithm, a priori limits are set based upon realistic concentration values.
max min iii CCC
9www.altarum.org
Hydro-optical modelHydro-optical model
Used to reconstruct remote sensing reflectance from water parameters
Consists of a matrix of absorption and backscattering coefficients at each band wavelength for Chl, DOC and SM.
Initial HO model was based on Lake Ontario measurements from the 1980’s
Varies between different water bodies due to a difference in types of Chl, DOC and SM. Therefore, a hydro-optical model based upon one body of water may not be applicable to another.
10www.altarum.org
The Algorithm ValidationThe Algorithm Validation
Two shipborne campaigns: June and September 2003 Historical data: 1998 – 2004
(GLERL, EEGLE)
11www.altarum.org
Validation Data CollectionValidation Data Collection
Satlantic Optical In Water Profiler
12www.altarum.org
Sampling Sites in the Vicinity ofSampling Sites in the Vicinity ofKalamazoo RiverKalamazoo River
Comparison of the chl concentrations (in g/l), obtained from in situ measurements (grey) and those retrieved from remote sensing data averaged over 9 neighboring pixels (black).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Jul-A Jul-B Jul-C Sep-B
Sampling time-place
chl,
ug/L
RS meanchl, ug/L
In-situmean chl,ug/L
13www.altarum.org
Sampling Sites in the Vicinity ofSampling Sites in the Vicinity ofKalamazoo RiverKalamazoo River
Comparison of the doc concentrations (in mgC/L), obtained from in situ measurements (grey) and those retrieved from remote sensing data averaged over 9 neighboring pixels (black).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jul-A Jul-B Jul-C Sep-B
Sampling time-place
doc,
mgC
/L
RS meandoc,mgC/LIn-situmean doc,mgC/L
14www.altarum.org
Sampling Sites in the Vicinity ofSampling Sites in the Vicinity ofKalamazoo RiverKalamazoo River
Comparison of the sm concentrations (in mC/L), obtained from in situ measurements (grey) and those retrieved from remote sensing data averaged over 9 neighboring pixels (black).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Jul-A Jul-B Jul-C Sep-BSampling time-place
sm, m
g/L
RS meansm, mg/L
In-situmean sm,mg/L
15www.altarum.org
Lake Michigan Characteristic FeaturesLake Michigan Characteristic Features
Dimictic lake (two overturns: the lake is vertically well mixed only from December to May)
Wind-driven circulation (coastal jets)
Episodic events: springtime resuspension (strong northerlies) and autumnal Ca precipitation (high water temperature
Wind Driven Circulation
16www.altarum.org
Seasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAsSeasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAs24 March 199824 March 1998
17www.altarum.org
Seasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAsSeasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAs17 April 199817 April 1998
18www.altarum.org
Seasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAsSeasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAs12 July 199812 July 1998
19www.altarum.org
Seasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAsSeasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAs25 August 199825 August 1998
20www.altarum.org
Seasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAsSeasonal Variations of Retrieved CPAs28 November 199828 November 1998
21www.altarum.org
Correlation Between Southern Lake Averaged Correlation Between Southern Lake Averaged smsm and Northern Winds During Feb/March (r = 0.95)and Northern Winds During Feb/March (r = 0.95)
2002
20032001
20002004
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12number of days in February and March with strong northern winds
sm c
once
ntra
tion
QuickSAT data
22www.altarum.org
Correlation Between Southern Lake Averaged Correlation Between Southern Lake Averaged smsm and Surface Temperature in August (r = 0.85)and Surface Temperature in August (r = 0.85)
20011999
2002
2003
2000
1998
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5
average water surface temperature, C
sm, m
g/l
AVHRR Pathfinder data
23www.altarum.org
Monthly Variation of Area Averaged sm and doc during Spring Monthly Variation of Area Averaged sm and doc during Spring Episodic Event for 1998 in Southern Lake MichiganEpisodic Event for 1998 in Southern Lake Michigan
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
11/26/97 01/25/98 03/26/98 05/25/98 07/24/98
Date
SM
(mg/
L), D
OC
(mgC
/L)
DOC
SM
24www.altarum.org
Spatial Distribution of (a) sm surface concentration, and (b)Spatial Distribution of (a) sm surface concentration, and (b) the sm Voluminal Content Per Square Kilometerthe sm Voluminal Content Per Square Kilometer
Within along shoreline strip(Metric tons)
Within off-shore outgrowth (Metric tons)
Value for March 24, 2004 570,000 300,000
Mean March value 570,000 420,000
25www.altarum.org
A Comparison of (A Comparison of (aa)) the Spatial Distribution the sm Voluminal the Spatial Distribution the sm Voluminal Content Per Square Kilometer, and (Content Per Square Kilometer, and (bb) the Contours (in meters) of ) the Contours (in meters) of
Bottom Sediment Accumulations Reported by Schwab Bottom Sediment Accumulations Reported by Schwab et alet al..
26www.altarum.org
A Comparison of Time Variations in doc and River A Comparison of Time Variations in doc and River Discharge for Grand River through 1998-2003Discharge for Grand River through 1998-2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000Ja
n-98
Jun-
98
Nov
-98
Apr
-99
Sep
-99
Feb-
00
Jul-0
0
Dec
-00
May
-01
Oct
-01
Mar
-02
Aug
-02
Jan-
03
Jun-
03
date
river
dis
char
ge
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
doc
river discharge doc
27www.altarum.org
Climate ChangeClimate Change
Remote sensing in the visible as a companion tool for lake monitoring
Climatechange
scenario
Lakereaction
Changesobservationsfrom space
28www.altarum.org
Climate Change Scenarios for Lake Michigan: Major Ecological Climate Change Scenarios for Lake Michigan: Major Ecological Consequences and Potential Identification from SpaceConsequences and Potential Identification from Space
Climate change
scenario
Initial lake reaction
Ensuing lake reaction
Changes in observed CPAs
Major ecologic consequence
Increasein air temperature
Increase of depth-averaged water temperature
Decreaseof ice concentration, disappearance of shore-bound ice, increase of ice-free period, extension of water stratification period
A. Earlier onset of spring resuspension events, increase in sm concentration, decrease of doc content
B. Earlier onset and increase of duration of autumnal calcium carbonate precipitation event, decrease of doc content
A. Increase of nutrient availability in spring, intensification of vernal phytoplankton growth, alterations of heterotrophic bacterial activity, increase of water toxicity
B. Increase of nutrient availability, intensification of phytoplankton growth, alterations of heterotrophic bacterial activity
29www.altarum.org
Climate Change Scenarios for Lake Michigan: Major Ecological Climate Change Scenarios for Lake Michigan: Major Ecological Consequences and Potential Identification from SpaceConsequences and Potential Identification from Space
Climate change
scenario
Initial lake reaction
Ensuing lake reaction
Changes in observed CPAs
Major ecologic consequence
Decrease of atmospheric precipitation
Decrease of river discharge
Decrease of input of sm and allochtonic doc, decrease of water turbidity in coastal zone
Decrease of sm and doc concentrations, increase of photic depth in coastal zone
Alterations of chl vertical profile, intensification of deep-layer chl, alterations of bacterial activityin coastal zone
Increase of atmospheric precipitation
Increase of river discharge
Increase of input of sm and allochtonic doc, increase of water turbidityin coastal zone
Increase of sm and doc concentrations, decrease of photic depth in coastal zone
Alterations of chl vertical profile, depletion ofdeep-layer chl, alterations of bacterial activityin coastal zone
30www.altarum.org
Future StepsFuture Steps
The generation of specific hydro-optical models for each of the Great Lakes using radiometric data at the MODIS visible bands and coincident in situ measurements of color-producing agents.
Examining the temporal and spatial variations of the hydro-optical properties of Lake Erie.
The generation of a better atmospheric correction model for coastal regions in order to have more “usable” pixels in these areas.
The adaptation of the algorithm for use with hyper-spectral imagery from the Hyperion sensor, in order to obtain images of color-producing agents that are more accurate and have better (30 m) spatial resolution.
31www.altarum.org
Further InformationFurther Information
Description of the Algorithm:Pozdnyakov, D., R. Shuchman, A. Korosov, and C. Hatt. 2005.
Operational algorithm for the retrieval of water quality in the Great Lakes. Remote Sensing of Environment. 97: 353-370.
Application to Lake Michigan:Shuchman, R., A. Korosov, C. Hatt, D. Pozdnyakov, J. Means,
and G. Meadows. 2005. Verification and Application of aBio-optical Algorithm for Lake Michigan using SeaWiFS:a Seven-year Interannual Analysis. Journal of Great Lakes Research. (in press, expected June 2006)
Contact Email:[email protected]