Mo Shar Rafa 1922

download Mo Shar Rafa 1922

of 10

Transcript of Mo Shar Rafa 1922

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    1/10

    U n s y m m e t r ic a l C o m p o n e n t s i n t h e S t a r k J E ]e ct.

    943

    I t i s v e r y u n f o r t u n a t e t h a t ti m e d i d n o t p e r m i t o f f u r t h e r

    e x p e r i m e n t s w i t h a w i d e r v a r i e t y o f e l e m e n t s a n d w i t h

    d e v i c e s f o r t h e d e t e c t i o n o f r a d ia t i o n o f o t h e r k i n ds . T h e

    i m p o r t a n c e o f a c o m p l e t e i n v e s t i g a t i o n a r is e s f r o m t h e f a c t

    t h a t t h e t r a c i n g o f t h e s u b s e q u e n t h is t o r y o f th e a to m i c

    n u c l e u s w h i c h h a s b e e n d i s r u p t e d b y th e c o ll is io n o f a n

    ~ - p a r t i cl e i s, a t p r e s e n t , o n e o f o u r f e w p a t h s t o a k n o w l e d g e

    o f th e f o r c e s w i t h i n t h e n u c l e u s .

    I n c o n cl u si o n, I w i s h t o t h a n k S i r E r n e s t R u t h e r f o r d f o r

    g i v i n g m e t h i s v e r y i n t e r e s t i n g p r o b l e m ; a n d M r . B i e l e r f o r

    h i s a s s i s t ance du r ing obse rva t ions .

    Cavendish Lab oratory,

    Cam bridge, 1921.

    C . O n t h e A p p e a r a n c e o f U n s y m m e t ri c a l C o m p o n e n t s i n t he

    S t a r k ~ f f e c t . B y A . lV[. ]~/[OSHARRAFA,B . S e . •

    § 1 . P r e l i m i n a r y .

    H E t h e o r y o f s p e c t r a l li n es w h i c h h a s h i t h e r to p r o v e d

    m o s t s u c c e s s f u l i n i n t e r p r e t i n g t h e r e s u l t s o f e x p e r i -

    m e n t is b a s e d u p o n c e r t a i n a s s u m p t i o n s o f a q u a n t u m t y p e

    i n t r o d u c e d b y B o h r t , S o m m e r fe l d $ , a n d o th e rs . S u c h

    a s s u m p t i o n s a r e o n l y j u s t if i a b le in s o f a r a s t h e y g i v e

    sa ti s [' ac to ry in te rp r e ta t ion s o f co r re la ted ph enom ena . The

    e f fec t o f an e lec t r i c f ie ld upon spec t ra l l ine s em i t t ed by

    s t~bstances su bje c te d to the f ie ld was f i rs t inv es t ig a ted

    by J . S t a r k § in 9 3; a n d a n a p p r o x i m a t e t h e o r y w a s

    f u r n i s h e d b y K . S c h w a r z s c h i l d [] a n d b y P . E p s t e i n ¶ i n d e -

    p e n d e n t l y in 1 9 1 6 : t h e t w o t h e o r ie s a r e s i m i l a r a n d g i v e

    s a t i s f a c t o r y e x p i a n a t io n s o f t h e p h e n o m e n o n a s i n v e s t ig a t e d

    b y S t a r k . N o w , a c c o r d i n g t o th e ir t h e o r~ l , t h e c o m p o ~ e n t s

    i n t o w h i c h a n y g i v e n s p e c t r a l l i n e i s s p l t u p a r e s . g m m e t r i c a l l y

    d i s t r ib u ted abou t t he or ig ina l p os i t i on o /' t he l i ne . I n t h e

    * Com municated by D r. J. W . Nicholson, F.R .S.

    t See e . g . N . Bohr~ Con stitution o f A tom s and )Ioleeules, Phil.

    M ag. Ju ly 1913.

    I See Arno ld Sommerfeld~ Atom bau und Spektrallinien,' II. A uf.

    (192l):

    § Berliner 8itz~ngsber.~ November 1913; Ann. d. Phys. x]iii, p. 983

    (1914).

    '.l K. Sehw arzschild, Z u r Q uanten theorie, JBerliner Sitzungsber.,

    April 1916.

    ¶ P. S. Epstein, Zu r Theorio des Starkoffektes, Ann. d. Phys. 1.

    p. 489 0916).

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    2/10

    9 4 4 M r . A . M . ~ o s h a r r a f a o n t h e A p p e a r a n c e o f

    p r e s e n t p a p e r a c l o s er a p p r o x i m a t i o n is w o r k e d o u t , a n d i t

    i s f oun d Esee § 4 ] t ha t f o r s t r on ge r f ie l ds t han t hose used by

    S t a r k t h i s s y m m e t r y n o l o n g e r fo l lo w s f r o m t h e t h e o r y : o u

    the o the r hand , a pa i r o f com po nen t s wh ich , f o r f ie lds com-

    p a r a b l e w i t h th o s e t h a t S t a r k u s e d * , a p p e a r s y m m e t r i c a l l y

    s i t ua t ed , w ou ld fo r s t r on ge r f ie lds be d isp l aced

    i n t h e s a m e

    direct ion

    so t ha t the sy m m et ry i s des t roy ed , W e , natu r.~ ll y ,

    a l so f i nd t ha t t he r e l a ti on be tw een t he s t r en g th o f t he f ie ld

    and t he d i sp l acem en t s o f t he l ine s i s no l ong e r r ep re se n t ed

    g r a p h i c a l l y b y s t r a ig h t l in e s , b u t b y p a r a b o li c c u r v e s w h o s e

    curv a tu r e s chan ge s i gn wi th t he d i sp l acem en t s (i. e . d i sp l ace -

    m e n t s o f o p p o s i te s i g n s c o r r e s p o n d t o p a r a b o l a s o f o p p o s i t e

    c u r v a t u r e s ) .

    I t a p p e a r s t o t h e p r e s e n t w r i te r t h a t a n e x p e r i m e n t a l

    i nve s t i ga t i on o f t he S t a rk e f f ec t f o r fi el ds s t r onge r t han

    t h o s e th a t h a v e a l r e a d y b e e n e m p l o y e d b y S t a r k i s h i g h l y

    d e s i ra b l e a s a f u r t h e r t e s t o f t h e f u n d a m e n t a l h y p o t h e s e s o f

    t h e q u a n t u m t h e o r y o f s p e c t r a : i f s u c h a n in v e s t i g a ti o n r e s u l t

    i n t he ve r i f ica t i on o f t he p r ed i c t i ons a l r ea dy r e f e r r ed t o , t hen

    t h i s w i l l a d d t o o u r f a i t h i n t h e f o u n d a t i o n s o f t h e q u a n t u m

    t h e o r y o f s p e c t ra l l i n e s : w h e r e a s a n e g a t i v e e x p e r i m e n t a l

    r e su l t wo t~ ld , un l e s s t he ana lys i s he r e p r e sen t ed be a t fau l t ,

    l e ad us t o a r econs ide ra t i on o f ou r a s sumpt ions , and pe rhaps

    to ce r t a i n mod i f i ca t i ons t he r eo f .

    § 2 . _Previous W or k.

    T h e e q u a t io n s r e s t r i c t in g t h e m o t i o n o f a n e l e ct ro n m o v i n g

    un de r t he i n f l uence o f an a t t r ac t i on t ow ards a nuc l eus a s w e l l

    a s a fi x e d f o r c e F c a n b e w r i t te n i n t h e f o r m

    w here I t i s P l a nc k s qua n tum of ac t i on , n l ~2 n~ a r e who le

    num ber s , m~ i s t he mass o f t he e l ec t ron , and f l (~ : ) f 20 / ) a r e

    g i v e n b y

    f~ (f) = 2 ( e E + B ) + 2 W ~ - e F E 4 - ~ ;,

    m ; ° I

    f ~ ( . ~ ) - 2 ( e E - f l) 4- 2 W n + e F ~ 4 - - v -~ ,j

    * Fo r the H lines, e. g. Stark used a field of abou t 28,500 volt × cm. -1

    (= 9 5 c.o.s..electrostatie un its). W e find that a field of about 10 times

    this streng th w ould give quite m easurab le effects.

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    3/10

    U n s y m m e t r i c a l C o m p o n e n t s in , t il e S t a r k E f f e c t. 945

    H e r e ( - - e ) is t h e c h a r g e o n t h e e le c t r o n , E t h a t o n t h e

    n u c l e u s , a n d a , / 3 , W a r e c o n s ta n t s a r i s i n g f r o m t h e i n t e -

    g r a t i o n o f t h e J a c o b i a n D i f f e re n t i al E q u a t i o n *. W r e p r e s e n t s

    t h e e n e r g y o f t h e e le c t r o n . T h e c o o r d i n a t e s $ a n d • a r e

    p a r a b o l i c c o o r d i n a t e s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e e q u a t i o n

    ~ + i ~ = - ~ ~ + i , ) ~ , . . . . . 3 )

    w h e r e x , y , z a re C a r t e s i a n c o o r d i n a t e s a t t h e n u c l e u s , 0 m

    being chosen par a l le l to the ex terna l f i e ld

    F . T h e l i m i t s o f

    i n t e g r a t i o n f o r t h e t w o f ir st i n t e g r a l s i n ( 1 ) a r e th e m a x i m a

    a n d m i n i m a o f ~: a n d ~/ r e s p e c t i v e l y . N o w t h e s e t w o

    i n t e g r a l s a r e b o t h o f t h e s a m e f o r m ; s o t h a t w e c a n w r i t e :

    j o I * +

    V r ~ D r dr---- 2n h, . (4)

    t h u s d e n o t i n g t h e t w o c a s e s f o r ~: a n d ~/ b y t h e s u ff ix e s 1

    a n d 2 r e s p e c t i v e l y w e h a v e

    - i : d q ,

    ,=2mow, ~ , = . , o ( e E + ) , C , = \2~ / Sa)

    D I = - - m o e F ;

    / n 3 h \ 2 l

    A ~ = 2m 0 W , B , = m o ( e E - - # ) , C , = - - [ ~ ) , ~ (5 b)

    D~ = moeF .

    N o w S o m m e r f e l d t w o r k s o u t t h e v t il ue o f t h e c o n t o u r

    i n t e g r a l o n t h e l e f t - h a n d s i d e. T h e v a l u e h e g i v e s is

    f

    B ~ D k - A ( 3 B ~ - c )

    0 )

    F r o m (4 ) a n d (6 ) w e c a n w r i t e ,

    D ( 7 )

    - - -

    B o t h S o m m e r f e ld a n d E p s t e i n h a v e o b t a i n e d t h e v a l u e

    o f W / w h i c h E p s t e i n d e n o te s b y ( - - A ) q b y s l i g h t l y d i ff e re n t

    m e t h o d s t o t h e f ir s t o r d e r i n F [ E p s t e i n s ( - - E ) ] . W e

    s h a l l p r o c ee d t o a s e c o n d a p p r o x i m a t i o n .

    * Fo r a fuller treatm ent of this sectmn, see Epstein s p ap er al eady

    referred to, also Som merfeld's Atom bau u.s.w.' II . Auf. p. 542, and p. 482.

    Jaeobi's method of integrating the Ham iltonian transformed equations is

    also given by Ap pell, ' Mdcanqque rationelle,' ii. p. 400 (Pa ris, 19 04 )..

    f ' Atombau u.s.w .' Zusatz vii. p. 482, under f.; we, however, w rite

    ~/0 for his ( - ~ /O).

    P h i l . M a g .

    S . 6 . Vo l . 43 . No . 257 .

    M a y

    192 2. 3 P

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    4/10

    9 4 6 M r , A . M . M o s h a r r a f a o n

    the Appearance o f

    § 3. C alcu lations .for C omparatively L ar ge _Fields.

    W e s h al l t r e a t t h e t e r m i n D i n e q u a t i o n (7 ) a s a c o r r e c t i v e

    o

    t e rm . L e t /~ , ~ + A ~ = / ~ r, f ~ r + ' B = ~ ' , e tc ., d e n o te t h e

    s u c c e ss iv e a p p r o x i m a t i o n s t o t h e v a l u e o f / ~ ; s im i l a rl y f o r

    A , B , a n d W . W e s e e t h a t t o t h e f ir s t o r d e r o f s m a l l

    q u a n t i t i e s

    1

    B ~ -- - [ B I + A B i ] ~ = [ B , + m o A B ] ~ f r o m ( 5 a )

    _ : B ? . 2 , n o B , ~ B , . . . . . . . 8 a )

    a n d s i m i l a r l y

    1

    B , f l- - B 2 2 - - 2 m o B 2 A ~ f r o m ( 5 b ). ( 8 b )

    o

    N o w t h e e q u a t i o n s f o r d e t e r m i n i n g A f~ c o u l d e a s i ly b e

    s o lv e d , b u t a s w e a r e a s s u m i n g E p s t e i n ' s w o r k ~ e s h a ll

    m e r e l y g i v e h e r e t h e v a l u e o b t a i n e d o n s o l v i n g h i s e q u a t i o n s

    ( 61 ) * . W e h a v e

    o ~ . F . h 4 ( n l + n 2 _ t _ n s )

    a B = . . . . .

    9 )

    64mo2eE27r~

    w h e r e

    N - - ( 6n2~+ 6n :ns + n~ J)

    (2n l 4- us )

    + (6n l~+6nln2+ns~) (2n~+ns ) ,

    ( 1 0 )

    s o t h a t w e h a v e f r o m (8 ) a n d (9 )

    1 o o h 4(n l + n 2 + n s ) N 1

    B 1 2 = B 1 ~ + 2 m o B i x 6 -~ m o _ , . ( l l a )

    s i m i l a r l y

    1

    B . ~ = B 2 ~ - - 2 m oB ~ x

    0

    a ls o , B ~ is o b t a i n e d f r o m ( 7) o n n e g l e c t i n g t h e t e r m i n D ,

    t h u s :

    h 4 • (n l + n , + n~ ) . N

    64rno~eE~Tr4 . F ; (1 1 b)

    * Ann.

    d. Phy s. 1. 1). 508 (19 16) ; our ~ eorrespond s to Epstein's

    (e~f l ) .

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    5/10

    U n s y m m e t r ic a l C o m p o n en ts i n t h e S t a r k E f f e c t . 947

    F r o m ( 1 1 ) a n d ( 1 2 ) w e h a v e

    3 2m o eE 'T P ( ~ / C + ~ i ) F

    ( 13 )

    S u b s t i t u t in g t h is v a l u e fo r B ~ i n t h e t e rm i n v o l v i n g D o n

    t h e r i g h t -h a n d s i d e o f ( 7 ) , w e h a v e

    _ _ q r ; ~

    -I-

    F

    32moeE ~

    v A 7P

    o r , s u b s t i t u t i n g t h e v a l u e s o f ] ) f r o m (5 ) , w e h a v e

    ~r-]F2

    (14)

    _ 1 2 ~ E ~ . ~ A 3 / 2 ;

    w r i t in g the tw o equa t ions em bodied in (14=) in fu l l and

    a d d i n g , w e o b t a in

    m o e E = ~ / ~ _ ~ J -1

    r e e f 3 n ~ - - n 2 I ~\

    4A

    \2 7r~ - ~

    3h4(n, + n, +

    n~)N

    [ ~ / C + n , + n , ) h i ]

    F , ( 15 )

    128Aa'27r4E~ L ~ J

    W e p ro c e e d t o s o l v e fo r A b y p u t t i n g

    A = - - ( K + L F + M F ~ ) . . . . . (1 6 )

    W e h a v e

    V X i ¢ - £ i ~

    = s K F

    a n d

    a n d 1 i

    1 4 M K L 2 _ \

    a p p ro x i m a t e l y , l

    ,,

    ( 17 )

    3 P 2

    j

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    6/10

    9 4 8 M r . A . ~ '[ . M o s h a r r a f a

    o n t he A p p e a r a n c e o f

    T h u s , s u b s t i t u t i n g i n ( 1 5 ) a n d p u t t i n g

    ~ / - ~ = n a h i

    2,n. J

    w e h a v e , o n e q u a t i n g t h e c o e ff ic ie n ts o f p o w e r s o [ F ,

    K = ¢ 4~r2(m °eE)' . . . . . (1 8 )

    ( n l + n 2 + n z ) ~ h 2 '

    3 h 2

    L = 4 - ~ - E ( n 2 - n t ) ( n x + n ~ . + n a ) , •

    ( 1 9 )

    L ~ 3 m o e h L

    M = 4 K 2 ~.K 3 /2 n 2 - n 0

    3 1,4 n l + n ~ + n 3 ) ~ 2 0 )

    6 4 r r 4 E .~K . . . .

    O n s u b s t i t u t i n g f r o m (1 8) a n d ( 1 9 ) i n ( 2 0 ), w e f i n a l l y

    o b t a i n

    M = - 27h~ (nl + n2 4- na) 3

    256~r~E4mo2e2 N ' , . . . . (2 1 )

    w he~o N = ( ~ + ~ + n 3 ) ( ~ - . 0 ~ + Z ~ . . (2~)

    W e t h u s f i n a l l y h a v e t h e f u l l e x p r e s s i o n f o r th e e n e r g y :

    27r2m0e~E2 3 F h 2 .

    W = - (n . + n~ + n3) '2h 0 8 ~ E ( n , - n ~ ) (n a + n~ + n , )

    + 27h (n~ + n 2 -6 n3) 3

    N FL

    ( 2 3 )

    512 7r6 E4 m o3 e :~

    T h u s i [ A W r e p r e s e n t t h e c h a n g e i n W d u e to t h e i n t r o -

    d u c t i o n o f t h e e x t e r n a l f ie ld F , w e h a v e

    3 F h 2

    27h6 (nz + n~ + n.~)3~ , - z

    _ , V . . ( 2 4)

    T h u s A v [ t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g c h a n g e i n f r e q u e n c y ] i s

    g i v e n , a c c o r d i n g t o B o h r ' s a s s u m p t i o n

    h a y = A W ~ - - A W . ,

    w h e r e W , . d e n o t e s t h e

    e n e r g y

    f o r m o t i o n in a p a t h [ c h a -

    r a c t e r iz e d b y t h e q u a n t u m n u m b e r s m l m 2 m ~ ] f r o m w h i c h

    t h e e l e o tr o n s t a r t s t o m o v e t o w a r d s t h e n - p a t h , b y t h e

    f o r m u l a

    3 h F

    a ~ - 8 .~ ,,o E ~ ~ - ~ , ) n t + ~ +

    ~ )

    - , ~ - m 0 m ~ + ~ + m ~) }

    27hSF'~

    + 512~r~E4moae~ -- (n~ + n~ + n3) 3N '(n )

    + ( .,~ + . ~ + m~)N (m) } , (~ 5)

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    7/10

    Un sy mme t r i c a l Co mp o n e n t s i n t h e S ta rk . E f f e c t . 9'49

    w h e r o ~ q r ( m ) a n d N t ( n ) a r e i d e n t i c a l f u n c t i o n s o f 'in a n d n

    r e s p e c t i v e l y .

    § 4 . A p p l i c a t io n to t h e H~ l i n e .

    W e p r o c e e d t o a p p l y e q u a t i o n (2 5) t o s p e c i f ic l in e s o f t h e

    e l e m e n t s . L e t u s t a k e a s a n e x a m p l e t h e H ~ l in e o f t h e

    B a l m e r S e ri es . H e r e n l q - n 2 + n 3 = 2 , m z - l - m 2 + m 3 ~ 3 ,

    v = 4 5 7 1 x 1014, k = ' 6 5 6 2 8 × 1 0 - 4 ; l e t u s a ls o w r i t e (25)

    i n t h e f o r m

    A v = ( P ~ - Q 1 ) × K f l ? + ( Q 2 - P 2 ) K 2 F 2 ; (2 6)

    t h e n

    P1 = n ~ - - nl) (nl + n2 + n 3 ) , Q , = m 2 - - , n l m ~ + m : + m 3 ) ,

    3 h

    K t = 87r%~o]~' [

    P ~ = ( ~ + ~ + n ~ ) ' ( . ~ - ~ ,1 )~ + ( 1 + .0 +

    ~ ) ~ , , ) ,

    q ~ = ( ~ + ~ + m ) ' ( m ~ - , n l ) ~ + (m ~ + . , ~ + , , ~ ) 3 ~ ( , n ) .

    2 7 h 5

    K 2 -

    5127r~E ~o~ ~, J

    T h e n w r i t i n g d o w n i n a t a b u l a r f o r m th e p o ss ib l e v a l u e s

    o f n i n o n 3 a n d m l m : m a , w o h a y % o n a v a i l i , g o u rs e lv e s o f

    S o m m e r f e l d ' s A u s w a h l p r i n z i p f o r t h e d e f i n i ti o n o f t he

    p l a n s o f p o l a r i z a t i o n a n d t h e r e s t r i c ti o n s o n t h e p o ss ib l e

    c o m b i n a ti o n s o f t he q u a n t u m n u m b e r s :

    ( 2 7 )

    TABLE A.

    I

    I I .

    I I L

    V.

    g I .

    2 0 0 0 128

    1 1 0 2 144

    1 0 1 --2 144

    0 1 1 0 19 2

    0 2 0 4 64

    0 0 2 4 6 4

    % . ~ . ~1. Q~. Q,.

    a. 3

    b. 2

    e. 2

    d. 1

    e. 1

    f . 1

    y. 0

    h. 0

    i. 0

    j . 0

    0 0 0 1458

    1 0 3 2025

    0 1 -- 3 2025

    1 1 0 2106

    2 0 6 1458

    0 2 -- 6 1458

    2 1 3 2025

    1 2 --3 2025

    3 0 9 729

    0 3 --9 7 29

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    8/10

    95

    M r. A . h i . M osha r , a f a

    on the Appearance o~

    TABLE B

    F i r s t G r o u p .

    m ~ n a = O

    ; p - c o m p o n e n t .

    (I. b) ......

    (I1. d) ......

    I I . e )

    ......

    ( I I . f ) . . . . . .

    (IV.g ) ......

    (IV. # .......

    (V. g) .... .. k

    (v. h) ......

    (v. i). . . . . .

    (v.j ) . . . . . .

    P1-Q1.

    - - 3

    + 2

    - - 4

    + 8

    - - 3

    - 9

    + 1

    + 7

    - 5

    +13

    Q 2 - - ~ 2

    1 8 9 7

    1962

    1314

    1314

    I:)1 - - [~1.

    (I. c) ... ... + 3

    (I II . d) .., -- 2

    I

    (I II .f ) . .. + 4

    n I . e ) . . . . . . - 8

    I

    1 8 9 7

    1962

    1314

    1314

    1833

    537

    1951

    1951

    665

    665

    (IV.h ) ... + 3

    (i v. j) .. + 9

    (v i. a) ...i - 1

    (V i.g) ... - 7

    (V i. g) -,.i + 5

    (VI. i) ... [ -- 13

    1833

    537

    1951

    1951

    665

    665

    S e c o n d G ro u

    P 1 - - Q 1 °

    I . a ) . . . . . . o

    I . e ) . . . . . . - - 6

    (i i. b) ...... - 1

    (i i. c) ...... + 5

    (i i. g) ..... - 1

    (i i. h) ...... + 5

    (I I. i) ...... - 7

    (I I. j ) . . .. . . +11

    (IV . e) ...... -- 6

    (V. e) ... ... - 2

    (v . f) . .. .. . +~o

    (V.d) ...... + 4

    (IV. d) ...... o

    TABLE C.

    ). ma-- n := +1 ; n -co mpone n t .

    q 2 - - P 2

    1330

    1330

    1881

    1881

    1881

    589

    589

    1266

    1394

    1394

    2042

    1914

    P 1 Q 1 •

    (i. d) ...... 0

    (I .f ) .. . . .. + 6

    ( I l L e) ... + 1

    ( II i . b) . . . . 5

    (I II . h) ... + 1

    ( I I I . g ) . . . . 5

    (I II . j ) . .. + 7

    (II I. i) . .. -u

    (I V. f) ... + 6

    (v i. f) ... + 2

    (VI.e) ... I 0

    v t . ~) .. - 4

    1978

    1330

    188l

    1881

    1881

    ]88i

    589

    589

    1266

    1394

    1394

    2042

    T h e a r r a n g e m e n t o f t h e t a b l e s i s v e ry s i m p l e . I n

    T a b l e A w e p u t d o w n a l l t h e p o s s i b l e v a l u e s fo r t h e n ' s a n d

    th~ m ' s separ a t e ly fo r t he l ine H~. Then in Tab le s B and C

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    9/10

    Uns lmmetrlcal Components in the Stark Effect . 9 5 1

    w e c h o o s e s u c h c o m b i n a t i o n s a s g i v e r i s e t o ms--na--'.-O

    o r m 3 - - n 3 = ___1 r e s p e c t i v e l y . T h e g r o u p i n T a b l e A c o r r e -

    s p o n d s to l in e s w h e r e t h e p l a n e or p o l a r i z a t i o n i s p e r p e n -

    d i c u l a r t o t h e i m p r e s s e d f i el d F [ i . e . t h e e l e c t r ic f o r c e

    p a r a l l e l t o F ] , a n d t h a t o f' T a b l e B t o l in e s w h e r e t h e l i g h t

    i s p o l a r i z e d i n a p l a n e p a r a l l e l t o F f t. e . t h e e l e c t r i c f o r c e

    p e r p e n d i c u l a r t o F ] .

    W e o b se rv e t h a t w h e r e as ( P 1 - Q ~ ) h a s a n e g a t i v e v al ue

    n u m e r i c a l l y e q u a l t o e v e r y o n e o f it s p o s s ib l e p o s i t i v e v a l u e s ,

    ( Q 2 - 1 ~ 2 )

    on the other hand has an invariable positive sign

    a n d a roughlg constant order of magnitude, vlz. 108.

    I f w e a v a i l o u r s e l v e s o f th e m o s t r e c e n t v a l u e s ~ f o r t h e

    c o n s t a n t s i n v o l v e d i n t h e f o r m u l a ( 2 5 ) , v i z .

    h : 6 5 4 7 × 1 0 -~7, e -- -- 4 7 7 4× 1 0 - l° , e _ 5 . 3 0 1 × 1 0 1 7 ,

    m

    a n d if w e p u t E : e f o r h y d r o g e n , w e h a v e

    K ~ = 5 7 8 4 × 1 0 s. K ~ ----7 6 77 x 1 0 ; ( 2 8 )

    s o t h a t ( 2 6 ) c a n n o w b e w r i t t e n

    A v = 5 ' 7 8 4 × 1 0 S x Z × F + 7 6 7 7 × R z × 1 0 4 x F ~, (2 9 )

    R - - Q 2 - P~

    w h e re z - ( P ~ - Q 1 ) , ~ - 1 00 0 '

    o r o n t h e sc a le o f w a v e - le n g tl ~ s , s in c e A v = - - ~ d X,

    - -A% --- - '8304 × 10 -~° x F x Z + 1 102 × 10 -~4 × R zF 2. (30 )

    H e r e i t m u s t b e r e m e m b e r e d t h a t F i s m e a s u r e d i n a b so l ut e

    c .G . s, e l e c t r o s t a t i c u n i t s . I n ( 3 0 ) w e o b s e r v e t h a t Z is a

    w h o l e n u m b e r , p o s i t iv e o r n e g a t i v e , b e t w e e n 0 a n d 1 3 a n d

    t h a t R z v a r i e s f r o m a b o u t ½ t o a b o u t 2 .

    I [ w e a s s m n e a v a l u e f o r F :- -- 10s [ = 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 v o lt × e m . - l ~ ,

    t h e n i f X~ b e w r i t t e n f o r X × 1 0 s [ i. e . i f w e m e a s u r e X ', t h e

    w a v e - l e n g t h , i n / ~ n g s t r S m u n it s~ w e w r i t e :

    - - A k ' ---- 8 3 0 4 Z + 1 1 0 2 × R~ . . . . . (3 1 )

    W e t h u s s ee t h a t f o r s m a l l v a l u es o f Z , t h e s e c o n d t e r m

    o n t h e r i g h t - h a n d s i d e o f ( 3 1 ) i s q u i t e a p p r e c i a b l e c o m p a r e d

    w i t h t h e f i r st t e r m [ e. g . f o r Z ~ - 1 t h e r a t i o i s a b o u t ¼ ] ; and

    * These are quoted from 1~. A. M illikan's ~ T h e Ele ctron , ' Th e

    University of Chicago Press, Th ird Impression 1918, pp. 238 and 251.

  • 8/16/2019 Mo Shar Rafa 1922

    10/10

    9 5 2

    Un symm etrical Co mpo nents in the Sta rk Effect.

    since this term has an invariable va lu e/ or equa l an d opposite

    values o f Z it/ollo w s that the symm etry o f the lines is destroyed.

    A l s o t h e p a r a b o l i c r e la t i o n b e t w e e n A r a n d F [ o r ~ a n d F ]

    is f u r n is h e d b y ( 2 9 ) a n d ( 3 0 ) r e s p e c t i v e l y . W e g i v e h e r e a

    t a b l e o [ t h e d i s p l a c e m e n t s o f t h e n i n e l in 'e s o b s e r v e d b y

    S t a r k f o r a h y p o t h e t i c a l f ie ld o f 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 v o l t x c m . - 1 a s

    p r e d i c te d b y o u r t h e o r y .

    p o

    m p o n o n t . n - c or n p o n e n L.

    Z . .. .. . + 2 L

    - 2

    1~ .., 1 962 1 962

    , 1 1 4 . 4

    AX ...1--18 8 -

    ÷ 3 I - - 3

    1 833 [ 1 833

    26 9 I+ 22'9

    + 4

    1 314

    -34 7

    - 4

    1 314

    +31 '8

    0

    i

    I I

    + 1

    1'881

    -10 3

    --1

    1 881

    +6 4

    T h e n - c o m p o n e n t l i n e w h i c h o c c u p i e s t h e o r i g i n a l p o s i t i o n

    o f t h e H ~ l in e i s s e en t o s p l it i n t o t h r e e c o m p o n e n t s - - t w o o f

    w h i c h a r e , h o w e v e r , v e r y d o s e t o g e t h e r - - f o r h i g h e r f ie ld s .

    T h e p o si ti o n o f t h e s e l in e s m a y , h o w e v e r , b e a p p r e c i a b l y

    a f fe c t e d b y h i g h e r t e r m s in e q u a t i o n ( 30 ) t h a n t h e l a s t

    t e r m w e h a v e l a k e n a c c o u n t o f ( i. e . t e r m s i n F 3 e t c . ) . I t i s

    t o b e o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e f u n c t i o n s o f th e q u a n t u m n u m b e r s

    i n v o l v e d s e e m to b e c o m e m o r e an d m o r e i m p o r t a n t i n d e t e r -

    m i n i n g t h e o r d e r o f m a g n i t u d e o f t h e r e s p e c t iv e t e r m s a s w e

    p r o c e e d t o c o n s i d e r h i g h e r p o w e r s o f F . H o w e v e r , t h e

    a b o v e c a l c u la t io n s o u g h t to f u r n i s h a f a i r l y a c c u r a t e t h e o r y

    f o r fi e ld s o f t h e m a g n i t u d e w e h a v e c o n s i d e r e d ; a n d , in o u r

    o p i n io n , i t w o u l d b e h i g h l y d e s i r ab l e t o m a k e e x a c t m e a s u r e -

    m e r it s f o r s u c h f ie ld s . W h e t h e r t h e a b o v e p r e d i c t i o n s w i l l

    o r w i l l n o t b e v e r i f i e d , r e m a i n s t o b e s e e n .

    I n c o n c lu s io n , I w i s h t o e x p r e ss m y t h a n k s t o P r o f . J . W .

    N i c h o l s o n f o r u s e f u l s u g g e s t i o n s .

    King's College, London,

    5Iay 1921.