LSCE 2004, Częstochowa

12
Janusz Murzewski, Kraków, PRACA ODCIĄGÓW w MASZTACH STALOWYCH BEHAVIOUR OF GUYS OF STEEL MASTS LSCE 2004, Częstochowa

description

Janusz Murzewski, Kraków, PRACA ODCIĄGÓW w MASZTACH STALOWYCH BEHAVIOUR OF GUYS OF STEEL MASTS. LSCE 2004, Częstochowa. NONLINEAR FIRST ORDER THEORY. Streletski, M oscow,1961 Petersen, Berlin 1970 etc. Old Polish Standard PN-79/B-03204. SIMPLE SECOND-ORDER THEORY. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of LSCE 2004, Częstochowa

Page 1: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

Janusz Murzewski, Kraków,

PRACA ODCIĄGÓW w MASZTACH STALOWYCH

BEHAVIOUR OF GUYS OF STEEL MASTS

LSCE 2004, Częstochowa

Page 2: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

NONLINEAR FIRST ORDER THEORY

• Streletski, Moscow,1961

• Petersen, Berlin 1970

• etc.• Old Polish Standard

PN-79/B-03204

Page 3: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

SIMPLE SECOND-ORDER THEORY

• Eurocode 3 Steel design. General rules prEN:1997

• Polish Steel Design Standard PN-90/B-03200

Page 4: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

ADVANCED SECOND-ORDER THEORY

• European Prestandard prEN 1993-3-1:1997 Towers and masts

• New Polish Standard PN-B-03204:2002

Page 5: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

NO-WIND SITUATION

2-nd order parabola 4-th order parabola

Page 6: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

WINDWARD GUY at ULS2-nd order parabola nearly straight line

Page 7: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

LEEWARD GUY at ULS2-nd order parabola Non- analytical curve

SBa - inclined SBa - horizontal

Page 8: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

THE ELASTIC SHAFTcontinuous beam free beam-column

() – buckling factor yM(z)+yN(z) - amplification

Page 9: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

UNCERTAIN INNOVATIONS prENV 1993-3-1:1997(who?) PN-B-3204:2002 (A.Cz.)

Wind patch loading

MW=Mm+Mp -global effect

Geometrical imperfections

yi=li/250 - to be amplified

Page 10: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

CONCLUSIONS I

• Out-of-plumb is the main reason of non-linear behaviour

• Normal-to-the-shaft component of gravity loads G sin

• Moment of external forces at the bottom hinge M0 = 0

Page 11: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

CONCLUSIONS II

• Non-linear behaviour of the windward guy – not important

• Deformation of leeward guy needs not to be analysed

• The mast at the ULS is statically determined

Page 12: LSCE 2004,  Częstochowa

CONCLUSIONS III

• If there are degrees of freedom of the analysis, initial tensions of guys may be optimised

• The mass of guys remains constant during deformation

• Patch load procedure and geometrical imperfections shall be verified