Literatur

Aebli, H.: Denken: Das Ordnen des Tuns. Bd. I : Kognitive Aspekte der Handlungstheorie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1980.

Ammon, V.: Probleme der Soziolinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer 1973. Anderson, J. R.: Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1976. Anderson, J. R.: Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review

85,249-277 (1978). Anderson, J. R., Bower, G.: Human associative memory. New York: Wiley 1973. Anderson, S.: On the role of deep structure in semantic interpretation. Foundations of Language 7,

387-396(1971). Anglin, J. M.: Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton 1977. Antinucci, F., Parisi, D.: On English modal verbs. Paper from the Seventh Regional Meeting. pp.

28·-39. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 1971. Apeltauer, E.: Drohen. In K. Sprengel, W. D. Bald, H. W. Viethen (Hrsg.): Semantik und Pragmatik.

Bd. 2, pp. 187 -198. Tübingen: Niemeyer 1977. Aqvist, L.: A new approach to the logical theory of interrogatives. Tübingen: Narr 1975. Atkinson, R.e., Juola, J. F.: Search and decision pro ces ses in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, Atkinson, R. e., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes (eds.): Contemporary developments in mathematical psychol-

ogy. Vol. I: Learning, memory, and thinking. pp. 243-293. San Francisco, CA.: Freeman 1974. Austin, J. L.: How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1962. Baird, J.: Psychological analysis of visual space. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1970. Bates, E.: Language and context: The aquisition ofpragmatics. New York: Academic Press 1976. Beauvois, J. L.: Langage-object et theorie des attitudes languieres. Doctoral Dissertation. Paris,

EHESS, 1978. Bechert, J., Clement, D., Thümmel, W., Wagner, K. H.: Einführung in die generative Transforma­

tionsgrammatik. München: Hueber 1970. Benson, J., Greaves, W.: The language people really use. Agincourt, Ontario: Book Society of Cana-

da 1973. Bernstein, B.: Language and social class. British Journal of Sociology 11,271-276 (1960). Bernstein, B.: Sprachlicher Kode und soziale Kontrolle. Düsseldorf: Schwann 1975. Bever, T. G., Rosenbaum, P.: Some lexical structures and their empirical validity. In D. Stein­

berg, L.A.Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics. pp. 586-599. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1971.

Biederman, J., Checkosky, S. F.: Processing redundant information. Journal of Experimental Psy­chology 83. 486-490 (1970).

Bierwisch, M.: Semantics. In J. Lyons (ed.): New horizons in linguistics. pp. 166-184. Harmonds­worth, Middlesex: Penguin 1975'.

Bock, M., Engelkamp, J.: Textstrukturen aus sprachpsychologischer Sicht. Folia Linguistica 12, 301-318 (1978).

Bogardus, E. S.: Measuring social distance. Journal for Applied Sociology 9. 299-308 (1925). Bolles, R. e.: The avoidance learning problem. In G. H. Bower (ed.): The psychology oflearning and

motivation. Vol. 6, pp. 97-145. New York: Academic Press 1972. Bourhis, R. Y., Genesee, F.: Evaluative reactions to code switching strategies in Montreal. In H. Gi­

les, W. P. Robinson, P. M. Smith (eds.): Language. Social psychological perspectives. pp. 335-343. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1980.

Bransford, J. D.: Human Cognition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth 1979.

Literatur 173

Bransford, J. D., Barday, J. R., Franks, J.J.: Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretative approach. Cognitive Psychology 3,193-209 (1972).

Bransford, J. D., Franks, J.J.: The abstraction of Iinguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology 2,331-350 (1971).

Brown, R: How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review 65.14-21 (1958). Brown, R., Gilman, A.: The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A.Sebeok (ed.): Style in lan-

guage. pp. 253-276. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1960. Bruce, B., Newman, D.: Interacting plans. Cognitive Science 2. 195-233 (1978). Bühler, K.: Sprachtheorie. Jena: Gustav Fischer 1934. Bunge, M.: Method, model, and matter. Boston: Reidel 1973. Butterworth, B.: Some constraints on models oflanguage production. In B.Butterworth (ed.): Lan­

guage production. Vol.l: Speech and talk. pp. 423-459. London: Academic Press 1980. Cazden, C. B.: The situation: A neglected source of social dass differences in language use. In

J. B. Pride, J. Holmes (eds.): Sociolinguistics. pp. 294-314. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin 1972.

Chafe, W. L.: Creativity in verbalization and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In RO.Freedle (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension. pp.41-55. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex 1977 (a).

Chafe, W. L.: The recall and verbalization ofpast experience. In R. W.Cole (ed.): Current issues in Iinguistic theory. pp. 215-246. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1977 (b).

Clark, E. V.: What's in a word? In T. E. Moore (ed.): Cognitive development and the aquisition of language. pp.65-11O. New York: Academic Press 1973.

Clark, H. H., Chase, W. G.: Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verifkation of descrip­tions. Memory and Cognition 2.101-111 (1974).

Clark, H. H., Clark, E. V.: Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1977. Clark, H. H., Haviland, S. E.: Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (ed.): Dis­

course production and comprehension. pp. 1--40. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex 1977. Clark, H. H., Lucy, P.: Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally

conveyed requests. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14. 56-72 (1975). Clark, H. H., MarshalI, C. R: Definite reference and mutual knowledge. Unpublished paper. Stan­

ford University 1980. Collins, A., Quillian, M.: Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Ver­

bal Behavior 8, 241-248 (1969). Comrie, B.: Linguistic politeness axes: Speaker-addressee, speaker-reference, speaker-bystander.

Pragmatics Microfiche 1.7. A3-BI (1976). Craik, F. 1., Cermak, L. (eds.): Levels ofprocessing and memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1978. Cranach, M. von, Kalbermatten, U., Indermühle, K., Gugler, B.: Zielgerichtetes Handeln. Bern: Hu­

ber 1980. Danks, J.H., Glucksberg, S.: Experimental psycholinguistics. Annual Review of Psychology 31.

391--417 (1980). Deese, J.: Pauses, prosody, and the demands of production in language. In H. W. Dechert, M. Rau­

pach (eds.): Temporal variables in speech. pp. 69-84. The Hague: Mouton 1980. Deutsch, J.A., Deutsch, D.: Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review 70.

80-90(1963). Deutsch, W.: Sprachliche Redundanz und Objektidentifikation. Marburg: Dissertationsdruck 1976. Deutsch, W., Clausing, H.: Das Problem der Eindeutigkeit sprachlicher Referenz. In H. Ueckert,

D. Rhenius (Hrsg.): Komplexe menschliche Informationsverarbeitung. pp. 369-377. Bern: Huber 1979.

Deutsch, W., Pech mann, Th.: Auf dem Weg zur Eindeutigkeit. (im Druck). Dörner, D.: Problemlösen als Informationsverarbeitung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1976. Duncan, S., Fiske, D. W.: Face-to-face interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1977. Ehrich, V., Saile, G.: Über nicht-direkte Sprechakte. In D. Wunderlich (Hrsg.): Linguistische Prag-

matik. pp. 255-287. Wiesbaden: Atenaion 19752•

Engelkamp,J.: Psycholinguistik. München: Fink 1974. Engelkamp, J.: Satz und Bedeutung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1976. Engelkamp, J.: Beziehung von Sprachpsychologie und Sozialpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsy­

chologie 9,288-298 (1978).

174 Literatur

Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.: Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87. 215-251 (1980). Ertel, S.: Psychophonetik. Göttingen : Hogrefe 1969. Ertel, S.: Where do the subjects of sentences come from'! In S. Rosenberg (ed.): Sentence production.

pp. 141-167. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1977. Ervin-Tripp, S.: On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz, D. Hymes

(eds.): Directions in sociolinguistics. pp. 213-250. New Y ork: Holt, Rinehart & Winston 1972. Ervin-Tripp, S.: The comprehension and production ofrequests by children. In E. V.Clark (ed.): Pa­

pers and re ports on child language development. Vol. 6. pp. 188-196. Stanford, Calif.: Committee on Linguistics, Stanford University 1974.

Ervin-Tripp, S.: Wait for me, roller skate! In S. Ervin-Tripp, C. Mitchell-Kernan (eds.): Child dis­course. pp. 165-188. New York: Academic Press 1977.

Feldman, C. F., Toulmin, St.: Theoretical problems in structuralist psychology. Nebraska Sympo­sium on Motivation. pp.409-476. Lincoln: University ofNebraska Press 1976.

Fillmore, c.l.: The case for case. In E.Bach, R.T.Harms (eds.): Universals in linguistic theory. pp. 1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston 1968.

Fillmore, c.J.: Verbs ofjudging: An exercise in semantic description. In c.J. Fillmore, D. T. Langen­doen (eds.): Studies in linguistic semantics. pp.272-289. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston 1971.

Fillmore, c.J.: Santa Cruz lectures on deixis. Indiana University, Linguistics Club Mimeo, 1975. Fillmore, c.J.: Frame semantics and the nature oflanguage. In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, J. Lancaster

(eds.): Origins and evolution oflanguage and speech. pp.20-32. New York: New York Academy ofSciences 1976.

Fishman, J. A.: Who speaks what language to whom and when? In J. B. Pride, J. Holmes (eds.): Socio­linguistics. pp. 15-32. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin 1972.

F1avell,J. H.: Concept development. In P. H. Mussen (ed.): Carmichael's Manual ofChild Psycholo­gy. VoLl. pp. 983-1060. New York: Wiley 1970.

Flavell, J. H., Botkin, B. T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. W., Jarvis, P. E.: The development ofrole-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley 1968.

Flores d' Arcais, G. B.: Cognitive principles in language processing. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Lei· den 1973.

Foppa, K., Käsermann, M.- L.: Das kindliche Wissen über Sprache: Überlegungen zu einem ungelö­sten Problem. In R. Groner, K. Foppa (Hrsg.): Kognitive Strukturen und ihre Entwicklung. Bern: Huber (im Druck).

Franck, D.: Zur Analyse indirekter Sprechakte. In V. Ehrich, P. Finke (Hrsg.): Beiträge zur Gramma-tik und Pragmatik. pp. 219-231. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor 1975.

Freedle, R.O. (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex 1977. Freedle, R. O. (ed.): New directions in discourse processing. Vol.2. New York: Ablex 1979. Fromkin, V. (ed.): Speech error as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton 1973. Garner, W. R.: The processing ofinformation and structure. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum 1974. Garrett, M. F.: The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Brown (ed.): The psychology oflearning

and motivation. pp. 133-177. New York: Academic Press 1975. Garvey, c.: Requests and responses in children's speech. Journal ofChild Language 2. 41-63 (1975). Gazdar, G.: Pragmatic constraints on linguistic production. In B. Butterworth (ed.): Language pro-

duction. VoLl: Speech and talk. pp.49-67. London: Academic Press 1980. Geiger, Th.: Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied: Luchterhand 1964. Geis, M. L., Zwicky, A. M.: On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 561-566 (1971). Gentner, D.: Evidence for the psychological reality of semantic components: The verbs of posses­

sion. In D.A. Norman, D. E. Rumelhart (eds.): Explorations in cognition. pp.211-246. San Fran­cisco: Freeman 1975.

Giles, H., Powesland, P. F.: Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press 1975. Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M., Higgins, E. T.: The development of referential communication skills.

In F. D. Horowitz (ed.): Review of child development research. Vol.4. pp. 305-345. Chicago: Uni­versity ofChicago Press 1975.

Gordon, D., Lakoff, G.: Conversational postulates. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting. pp. 63-84. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 1971.

Green, G.M.: How to get people to do things with words: The question of whimperatives. Unpublished paper. Urbana, 111.: University of lIIinois 1972.

Literatur

Gregory, M. J.: Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3, 177-198 (1967). Gregory, M. J., Carroll, S.: Language and situation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1978.

175

Grice, H. P.: Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (eds.): Syntax and semantics. Vol.3: Speech acts. pp.4I-58. New York: Seminar Press 1975.

Grimm, H.: Strukturanalytische Untersuchungen der Kindersprache. Bern: Huber 1973. Groner, R.: Hypothesen im Denkprozeß. Bern: Huber 1978. Groner, R., Foppa, K. (Hrsg.): Kognitive Strukturen und ihre Entwicklung. Bern: Huber 1981. Groner, R., Keller, 8., Menz, Ch.: Formale Präzision, wo und wozu, Oder: Der Affe auf dem Baum.

In R. K1uwe, H.Spada (Hrsg.): Studien zur Denkentwicklung. pp.291-302. Bern: Huber 1980. Guenther, R. K., Klatzky, R. L., Putnam, W.: Commonalities and Differences in Semantic Decisions

about Pictures and Words. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 54-74 (1980). Habermas, J.: Was heißt Universalpragmatik? In K. O. Apel (Hrsg.): Sprachpragmatik und Philoso­

phie. pp. 174-272. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1976. Halliday, M. A. K.: Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and

mood in English. Foundations of Language 6,322-361 (1970). Halliday, M. A. K.: Language and social man. London: Longman 1974. Hawkins, J. A.: Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction.

London: Croom Helm 1978. Hayes-Roth, F.: Distinguishing theories of representation: A critique of Anderson's "Arguments

concerning mental imagery". Psychological Review 86, 376-382 (1979). Herrmann, D. J.: An old problem for the new psychosemantics: Synonymity. Psychological Bulletin

85,490-512 (1978). Herrmann, 111.: Einführung in die Psychologie: Sprache. Frankfurt: Akademische Verlagsgesell­

schaft 1972. Herrmann, 111.: Die Psychologie und ihre Forschungsprogramme. Göttingen: Hogrefe 1976 (a). Herrmann, 111.: Zur situativen Determination der Sprachschichthöhe. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsycho­

logie 7,355-371 (1976(b». Herrmann, Th.: Zur Entwicklung der Sprachschichtrepräsentation in der späten Kindheit. In

G. Augst (Hrsg.): Spracherwerb von 6-16. pp. 209-219. Stuttgart: Schwann 1978. Herrmann, Th.: Die Situationsabhängigkeit des Sprechens und das Pars-pro-toto-Prinzip. Eine Zwi­

schenbilanz. Arbeiten der Forschungsgruppe Sprache und Kognition am Lehrstuhl Psycholo­gie III der Universität Mannheim. Mannheim : Bericht Nr. 10 (1979).

Herrmann, 111.: Sprechhandlungspläne als handlungstheoretische Konstrukte. In H. Lenk (Hrsg.): Handlungstheorien interdisziplinär. Bd.1. pp.361-379. München: Fink 1980.

Herrmann, Th.: Zur situativen Determination der Handlungsaufforderung. Experimentalpsycholo­gische Analyse eines Dialogsegments. In P. Schröder, H. Steger(Hrsg.): Dialogforschung ( = Spra­che der Gegenwart. Bd. 54.) pp.472-492. Düsseldorf: Schwann 1981.

Herrmann, 111.: Über begriffliche Schwächen kognitivistischer Kognitionstheorien : Begriffsinfla­tion und Akteur - System - Kontamination. (im Druck).

Herrmann, Th., Deutsch, W.: Psychologie der Objektbenennung. Bern: Huber 1976. Herrmann, 111., Laucht, M.: On multiple verbal codability of objects. Psychological Research 38,

355-368 (1976). Herrmann, Th., Laucht, M.: Pars pro toto. Überlegungen zur situationsspezifischen Variation des

Sprechens. Psychologische Rundschau 28, 247-265 (1977). Herrmann, Th., Laucht, M.: Planung von Äußerungen als Selektion von Komponenten implikativer

Propositionsstrukturen. In H. Ueckert, D. Rhenius (Hrsg.): Komplexe menschliche Informations­verarbeitung. pp. 378-386. Bern: Huber 1979.

Herrmann, 111., Winterhoff, P.: Leistungsbezogenes Aufteilen als situationsspezifische Korrektur von Gerechtigkeitskonzepten. Zum Einfluß von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen auf die Gewinnauftei­lung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 1 1,259-273 (1980).

Hörmann, H.: Semantische Anomalie, Metapher und Witz, oder: schlafen farblose grüne Ideen wirklich wütend? Folia Linguistica 5,310-330 (1972/73).

Hörmann, H.: Meinen und Verstehen. Grundzüge einer psychologischen Semantik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1976.

Hörmann, H.: Psychologie der Sprache. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer 19772•

Hörmann, H.: Einführung in die Psycholinguistik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1981.

176 Literatur

Hoppe-Graff, S., Schöler, H.: Wie gut verstehen und behalten Kinder einfache Geschichten? Wich­tigkeitsurteile und Reproduktionsdaten. Arbeiten der Forschungsgruppe Sprache und Kognition am Lehrstuhl Psychologie III der Universität Mannheim. Mannheim : Bericht Nr. 17 (1980).

Hymes, D. H.: Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press 1974. Joos, M.: The five docks. The Hague: Mouton 1961. Käsermann, M.-L.: Spracherwerb und Interaktion. Bem: Huber 1980. Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. Mimeo (UCLA), März 1977. Katz, J.J., Fodor, J.A.: The structure ofsemantic theory. Language 39, 170-210 (1963). Kempen, G.: Syntactic constructions as retrieval plans. British Journal of Psychology 67, 149 ·160

(1976). Kempen, G.: Conceptualizing and formulating in sentence production. In S. Rosenberg (ed.): Sen­

tence production. pp. 259-274. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1977. Kemper, T. D.: The fundamental dimensions of social relationship : A theoretical statement. Acta So-

ciologica 16,41-57 (1973). Kintsch, W.: The representation ofmeaning in memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1974. Kintsch, W.: Memory and cognition. New York: Wiley 1977. Kintsch, W., van Dijk, T. A.: Toward a model oftext comprehension and production. Psychological

Review 85, 363-394 (1978). Klahr, D., Wall ace, J. G.: Cognitive development: An information - processing view. Hillsdale, N. J.:

Erlbaum 1976. Klappenbach, R., Steinitz, W.: Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin: Akademie-

Verlag 1964. Klix, F. (Hrsg.): Psychologische Beiträge zur Analyse kognitiver Prozesse. Berlin: VER 1976. Kluwe, R.: Wissen und Denken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1979. Kluwe, R., Spada, H. (Hrsg.): Studien zur Denkentwicklung. Bem: Huber 1980. Kluwe, R., Spada, H.: Wissen und seine Veränderung: Einige psychologische Beschreibungsansätze.

In R.Groner, K.Foppa (Hrsg.): Kognitive Strukturen und ihre Entwicklung. Bem: Huber 1981.

Krantz, D. H,: A theory ofmagnitude estimation and cross modality matching.Joumal ofMathemat­ical Psychology 9, 168-199 (1972).

Kratzer, A.: What "must" and "can" must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1,337-355 (1977).

Küpper, H.: Wörterbuch der deutschen Umgangssprache. Hamburg: Classen 1964. Labov, W.: The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D. c.: Center for

Applied Linguistics 1966. Lachman, R., Lachman, J. W., ButterfieId, E.C.: Cognitive psychology and information processing.

Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1979. Lambert, W. E.: A social psychology ofbilingualism. In W. M. Whiteley (ed.): Language and social

change. pp. 95-11 O. London: Wiley 1971. Lantermann, E. D.: Interaktionen. Person, Situation und Handlung. München: Urban und Schwar­

zenberg 1980. Laucht, M.: Untersuchungen zur sprachlichen Form des Auffordems. In W. Tack (Hrsg.): Bericht

über den 31. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. S. 89-91. Götlingen: Hogrefe 1979.

Laucht, M., Herrmann, Th.: Zur Direktheit von Direktiva. Arbeiten der Forschungsgruppe Sprache und Kognition am Lehrstuhl Psychologie 111 der Universität Mannheim. Mannheim : Bericht Nr. I (1978).

Lenk, H.: Erklärung, Prognose, Planung. Freiburg: Rombach 1972. Lenk, H.: Handlung als Interpretationskonstrukt. In H. Lenk (Hrsg.): Handlungstheorien interdiszi­

plinär. Bd.2. S.279-350. München: Fink 1978. Lenneberg, E. H.: Biological foundations oflanguage. New York: Wiley 1967. Levelt, W.J. M.: Linearization in discourse. Mimeo. Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik, Nij­

megen 1979. Lewin, K.: Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Ausgewählte theoretische Schriften. Bem: Hu­

ber 1963. Linde, C. & Labov, W.: Spatial networks as a si te forthe study oflanguage and thought. Language 51.

924-939 (1975).

Literatur 177

Lounsbury, F.G.: Transitional probability, linguistic structure and systems of habit-family hier­archies. In C. E. Osgood, T. A. Sebeok (eds.): Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. pp.93-101. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press 1965.

Lyons,J.: Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1977. MacNeilage, P., Ladefoged, P.: The production of speech and language. In E.C.Carterette,

M.P.Friedman (eds.): Handbook ofperception. Vo!.7. pp.75-120. New York: Academic Press 1976.

Mandler, J. M.: Categorial and schematic organization in memory. CHIP Report No. 76. San Diego: University ofCalifornia 1978.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Welsh, A.: Processing interactions and lexical access during word recogni-tion in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 10, 29-63 (1980).

Metzger, W.: Psychologie. Darmstadt: Steinkopff 1954. Mikula, G. (Hrsg.): Gerechtigkeit und soziale Interaktion. Bern: Huber 1980. Miller, G.A.,Johnson-Laird, Ph. N.: Language and perception. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge Uni­

versity Press 1976. Mischei, W.: Toward a cognitive sociallearning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological

Review 80, 252-283 (1973). Montada, L.: Über die Funktion der Mobilität in der geistigen Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett 1968. Morgan, J. L.: Syntactic form and conversational import - some interactions. In D.Cohen (ed.): Pa­

pers from the UWM Linguistics Group First Annual Symposium on Limiting the Domain of Lin­guistics. Milwaukee: University ofWisconsin Press 1972.

Morgan, J. L.: Some interactions of syntax and pragmatics. In P. Cole, J. L. Morgan (eds.): Syntax and semantics. Vo1.3: Speech acts. pp. 289-303. New Y ork: Academic Press 1975.

Morton, J.: Word recognition. In J. Morton, J. C. Marshall (eds.): Psycholinguistics. Vo!. 2. pp. 107-156. London: Elek 1979.

Moscovici, S.: Communication process and the properties oflanguage. Advances in Experimental and Social Psychology 3, 225-270 (1967).

Neisser, U.: Kognition und Wirklichkeit. Stuttgart: Klett 1979. Nelson, K.: Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs ofthe Society for Research in

Child Development, Serial No. 149, Vo!.38 (1973). Newell, A.: Production systems: Models of control structures. In W. G. Chase (ed.): Visual informa­

tion processing. pp. 463-526. New York: Academic Press 1973. Nisbett, R.E., Wilson, T.D.: Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.

Psychological Review 84, 231-259 (1977). Norman, D. A., Rumelhart, D. E.: Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman 1975. Oldfield, R.C.: Things, words, and the brain. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 18,

340-353 (1966). Olson, D. R.: Language and thought. Psychological Review 77,257-273 (1970). Olson, G. M., Clark, H. H.: Research methods in psycholinguistics. In E. C. Carterette, M. P. Fried­

man (eds.): Handbook of perception. Vo!.7: Language and speech. pp. 25-74. New York: Academic Press 1976.

Osgood, Ch. E.: Where do sentences come from? In D. D.Steinberg, L.A.Jakobovits (eds.): Sem an­tics. pp.497 -529. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1971.

Osgood, Ch.E., Bock, K.: Salience and sentencing. In S.Rosenberg (ed.): Sentence production. pp. 89-140. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1977.

Palmer, St. E.: Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch, B. B. L10yd (eds.): Cog­nition and categorization. pp. 259-303. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum 1978.

Pearce, W. B.: The coordinate management of meaning: A rule-based theory of interpersonal com­munication. In G. R. Miller (ed.): Exploration in interpersonal communication. pp. 17 -35. Beverly HiIIs-London: Sage 1976.

Posner, M. J., Rogers, M. G.: Chronometric analysis of abstraction and recognition. In W. Estes (ed.): Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Vo!.V: Human information processing. pp. 143-188. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1978.

Posner, M.J., Snyder, C. R.: Attention and cognitive contro!. In R. Solso (ed.): Information proces­sing and cognition. pp. 55-85. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum 1975.

Potter, M.C., Faulconer, B.A.: Time to understand pictures and words. Nature 253, 437-438 (1975).

178 Literatur

Prentice, J. L.: Effects of cueing actorversus cueing object on word order in sentence production. Psy­chonomic Science 8. 163-164 (1967).

Pylyshyn, Z. W.: What the mind's eye teils the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psycholo-gical Bulletin 80,1-24(1973).

Quasthoff, U. M.: Erzählen in Gesprächen. Tübingen: Narr 1980. Rommetveit, R: Words, meanings, and messages. New York-London: Academic Press 1968. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (eds.): Cognition and categorization.

pp. 27-47. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1978. Rosenberg, S. (ed.): Sentence production: Development in research and theory. H iIlsdale, N. J.: Erl­

baum 1977. Rubin, J. Z., Lewicki, R.J.: A three-factor experimental analysis of promises and threats. Journal of

Applied Social Psychology 3, 240-257 (1973). Rumelhart, D.: Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow, A Collins (eds.): Representation and

understanding. pp.211-236. New York: Academic Press 1975. Rumelhart, D., Lindsay, R, Norman, D.: A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tul­

ving, W. Donaldson (eds.): Organization of memory. pp. 197-246. New York: Academic Press 1972.

Rumelhart, D., Ortony, A: The representation ofknowledge in memory. In R C. Anderson, R J. Spi­ro, W. E. Montague (eds.): Schooling and the aquisition ofknowledge. pp. 99-135. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum 1977.

Sacerdoti, E.: A structure for plans and behavior. New York: Elsevier 1977. Savigny, E. v.: Die Philosophie der normalen Sprache. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1969. Schank, R.C., Abelson, R: Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1977. Schlesinger, J. M.: A note on the relationship between psychological and linguistic theories. Founda-

tions of Language 3, 397-402 (1967). Schlesinger, J. M.: Production and comprehension of utterances. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum 1977. Schlesinger, J. M.: Cognitive and Iinguistic structures: The case of the instrumental. Journal of Lin-

guistics 15,307-324 (1979). Schlieben-Lange, B.: Soziolinguistik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1973. Schmerling, S. F.: Aspects of English sentence stress. Austin: University ofTexas Press 1976. Schnelle, H.: Das Gebiet und die Entwicklung der Linguistik. In J. Ritter, K. Gründer (Hrsg.): Histo-

risches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Bd.5. Sp.330-340. Basel: Schwabe 1980. Schraml, W. J.: Einführung in die modeme Entwicklungspsychologie. Stuttgart: Klett 1972. Scotton, C. M., Uri, W.: Bilingual strategies: The social function of code-switching. International

Journal ofthe Sociology of Language 13, 5-20 (1977). Searle, J. R: Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1969. Searle, J.R: Indirect speech acts. In P.Cole, L.Morgan (eds.): Syntax and semantics. Vo1.3.

pp. 59-82. New York: Academic Press 1975a. Searle, J.R.: A taxonomy ofillocutionary acts. In K.Gunderson (ed.): Minnesota Studies in the Phi­

losophy of Language. pp. 344-369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 1975 b. Sebastian, RJ., Ryan, E.B., Keogh, T.F., Schmidt, AC.: The effects ofnegative affect arousal on

reactions to speakers. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, P. M. Smith (eds.): Language. Social psycholo­gical perspectives. S. 203-208. Oxford: Pergamon 1980.

Selz, 0.: Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs. Stuttgart: Speemann 1913. Selz, 0.: Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens und des Irrtums. Bonn: Cohen 1922. Selz, 0.: Die Gesetze der produktiven und reproduktiven Geistestätigkeit. Bonn: Cohen 1924. Seymour, P. H.: A model for reading, naming and comparison. British Journal of Psychology 64,

35-49 (1973). Simon, M.A, Lea, G.: Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L. W.Gregg (ed.):

Knowledge and cognition. pp. 105-128. Potomac, Md.: Erlbaum 1974. Sinclair,J. M., Coulthard, R. M.: Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press

1975. Siobin, D.J.: Einführung in die Psycholinguistik. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor 1974. Smith, E. E.: Choice reaction time: An analysis ofthe major theoretical positions. Psychological Bul­

letin 69, 77-110(1968). Smith, E. E.: Theories of semantic memory. In W. K. Estes (ed.): Handbook oflearning and cognitive

processes. Vo1.6. pp. I-56. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1978.

Literatur 179

Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., Rips, L. J. : Structure and processes in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review 8/. 214-241 (1974).

Sokolov, E. N.: Internal speech and thought. International1ournal ofPsychology 6. 79-92 (\ 971). Spiro, R J.: Inferential reconstruction in memory for connected discourse. Laboratory for Cognitive

Studies in Education. Tech. Rep. NO.2. Urbana, IIl.: University of IIlinois, October 1975. Stachowiak, H.: Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Wien-New York: Springer 1973. Stegmüller, W.: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Heidelberg: Springer 1969. Stein, N. L., Glenn, C. G.: An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In

R. O. Freedle (ed.): N ew directions in discourse processing. pp. 53-120. New Y ork: Ablex 1979. Stokols, 0.: Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology 29. 253-295 (\ 978). Tannenbaum, P. H., WilJiams, F.: Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject

and object focus. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7.246-250 (1968). Thorndyke, P. W.: Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cog­

nitive Psychology 9. 77-110 (1977). Toulmin, St.: Rules and their relevance for understanding human behavior. In T. Mischel (ed.): Un­

derstanding other people. pp. 185-215. Oxford: Blackwell1974. Toulmin, St.: Der Gebrauch von Argumenten. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor 1975. Valian, V.: Talk, talk, talk: A selective critical review oftheories of speech production. In R. O. Freed­

le (ed.): Discourse production and comprehension. pp. 107-139. Norwood, N. J. : Ablex 1977. Wahlster, W.: ATNs und die semantisch-pragmatische Steuerung der Analyse und Generierung na­

türlicher Sprache. Projektgruppe Simulation von Sprachverstehen. Hamburg: Bericht Nr.11 (1979).

Warden, D. A: The influence of context on children's use of identifying expressions and references. British Journal of Psychology 67. 101-112 (1976).

Welke, K.: Untersuchungen zum System der Modalverben in der deutschen Sprache der Gegenwart. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag 1965.

Wender, K. F., Colonius, H., Schulze, H. H.: Modelle des menschlichen Gedächtnisses. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1980.

Weydt, H.: Abtönungspartikeln. Berlin-Zürich-Bad Homburg: Gehlen 1969. Whorf, B. L.: Language, thought and reality; selected writings. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press

of Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology 1956 Wickelgren, W.A: Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-HaIl1979. Wickelgren, W. A: Human learning and memory. Annual Review ofPsychology 32. 21-52 (1981). Wiemann, J. M., Krueger, D. L.: The language of relationships. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson,

P.M.Smith (eds.): Language. Social psychological perspectives. pp.55--61. Oxford: Pergamon 1980.

Wimmer, H., Perner,J.: Kognitionspsychologie. Stuttgart: Klett 1979. Winograd, T.: A procedural model oflanguage understanding. In RC.Schank, K. M.Colby (eds.):

Computer models of thought and language. pp. 152-186. San Francisco: Freeman 1973. Winograd, T.: Frame representations and the dec1arative-procedural controversy. In D. Bobrow,

AColJins (eds.): Representation and understanding. pp. 185-210. New York: Academic Press 1975.

Winterhoff, P., Herrmann, Th.: Verteilungsgerechtigkeit als Persönlichkeitsmerkmal. Arbeiten der Forschungsgruppe Sprache und Kognition am Lehrstuhl Psychologie III der Universität Mann­heim. Mannheim: Bericht Nr.7 (1979).

Verzeichnis der Experimente

Parkplatzexperiment 73

Verwandtschaftsexperiment 77

Kerzenexperiment 81

Science-fiction-Experiment 81

Puzzle-Experiment 101

Kontextexperiment 102

Quizexperiment 103

Detektivexperiment 143

Filmexperiment 145

Wie-wahrscheinlich-würdest -du-es-sagen-Experiment 146 (W -Experiment)

Zuteilungsexperiment 147

Sachverzeichnis

Attribut 68, 69, 71, 72, 74-78, 80-88,110-113 -, mehrstelliges 76-78 Attributprivilegierung 80-84 Aufforderung I, 21, 22, 27, 28, 56, 62-64,

115-156 Aufforderungen, Direktheit von 115, 117-120,

127 Aufforderungsfehler 131-135, 139-140 Aufforderungstaxonomie 115-130, 154 Aufforderungsvarianten 121-129, 133-135, 154 Aufforderungsvariation I, 12, 13,21,22, 115-157 Ausdruck, sprachlicher 22, 23

Basis, propositionale (PB) 9-12, 26-31, 33-38, 40,41,43-47, 54-56, 71, 113, 130, 142, 157, 159,161,163,165,169

Bedeutung 16-20,25,160,161 Bedeutungskomplex 158, 160, 161 Bedeutungsstruktur 158, 160, 161 Bedingungsanalyse 64--{j7 Benennbarkeit, multiple 12, 80-85, 157 Benennungsvariation 12,71-88 Bereitschaft 12, 135-138, 141-156, 163 Bewertung, kognitive 10, 11,23,25,33,40,41,45,

47,63,127,142,143,154 Berichten 13,56,67,164-170 Berichtsschema 166

"Computermetapher" 6-8, 34-36, 67, 163, 164, 166

Darstellungsweise, propositionale 29-31, 33, 159,161,162

Dekodierung 9-11, 26, 40, 41, 45 Dialoganalyse 5, 8, 34, 51, 116, 117 Distanz, soziale 12,63,64,91-98,101,102 Drei-Ebenen-Ansatz 158, 160, 161 Dringlichkeit 12, 135-138, 142-153, ISS, 156

Enkodierung 9-13, 24, 28, 29,129,130,143,158, 160,161, 163, 164

-, lexikalische 9-13, 31, 32, 47, 54, 55, 58, 59,90, 91,109-114,133,134,143

-, prosodische 9-13, 31, 32, 39, 47, 54, 55, 60, 61, 133, 134, 143

-, syntaktische 9-13, 31,33,47, 54, 55, 59, 60,143 Episode 49, 51,92

Forschungsdefizit 1,5-9, 171

Gesamtverbalisation 43, 44, 129 Gewinnaufteilung 147-153 Grammatikalität 19, 23 Grundmodell der Sprachproduktion 24-34, 163,

164

Handlungsaufforderung s. Aufforderung Handlungsziel9, 13,23,24,35,37,39,41,42,47,

49,62-64,118,121-124,128,130,169,171

Implikationsstruktur 121-125, 128, 153, 166 Information (für den Partner) 10, 13, 22, 23, 25,

28,34,42,43,62,63,73,74,84,136,162 Informationsverarbeitungsansatz s. "Compu­

termetapher" Inputmarker(I-Marker) 28,158-162 Inputselektion 10, 12, 13,31,34,40,43,46,47,54,

55, 57, 58, 61--{j7, 71-73, 78, 84-88, 91, 109-114,126,129-143,160,163-165,167-169

Input, semantischer (SI) 9-12, 26-29, 31, 33, 34, 38-41,43-47,57, 59--{j9, 71-73,110-114,126, 142, 157-162, 164, 165, 167, 168

Instrumentalität 10, 13,22,23,25,28,34,42,43, 62,63,73,74,121,136,162

Kompetenz 4, 5,13 Kommunikation, non-verbale 23, 26 Können 135-138, 141, 142, ISS Kontrolle, kognitive, s. Bewertung, kognitive Konventionalität 46, 118

182

Lautproduktion 15-18,23,24,54,55,58,61,90 Legitimation 13, 120-124, 127, 135-138, 141-157 Lexemfilter 111, 113 Linearisierung 166-169

Methodik 2-5,8, 11, 13, 14,29,35,46,47,54, 61-67,98-101,128,140,143,154,171

Metapher 20,21, 110 Mittellegitimation s. Legitimation Morphem 18,19,23

Objektbenennung I, 12, 68-114, 157 -, diskriminierende 73, 75, 76, 78, 80-88 -, redundante 75, 76, 78-80 Objektbereichsdistanz 12, 90-98, 10 I-I 09, 157 Objektdistanz 80-85 Objektkonstellation 69, 73, 74, 78, 79, 84 Objektkontext 12,68-88 Ökonomie, sprachliche 46

Pars-pro-toto-Prinzip 10, 12, 13,38-46,61,126, 128,130,136,157-160

Performanz 4, 5, 13 Phonem 17,18,23,90,110 Postulate 88,114,155-157 Prädikat-Argument-Struktur s. Proposition Problemlösen 38, 167 Proposition 9,10,27,28,30,31,33,37-39,43,68,

69,71,162,164 Prozeßanalyse 67,78-80, 84-87, 155 Psycholinguistik 2-5

Regulation, sprachliche 47, 141, 170, 171 Redemodalität 91, 102 Regel, semantische 19-21,24 Rekonstruktion, kognitive 9, 21, 27, 28, 35,

40-42,44,45,63,68-71,125,127,166,167 Rekonstruktivität 46 Relativismus, linguistischer 113, 160

Schema, kognitives 51, 52, 125, 126, 130, 154 Script s. Schema

Sachverzeichnis

Selektionsprogramm s. Inputselektion Sequentierung s. Linearisierung Situation 6, 9,10,20,21,24,26,41,42,45,48-67,

82 Situationsabgrenzung 48-51 SituationsaufTassung 9, 11,26,49,52, 135-142,

153,160,163,165 Situationseinfluß 6, 9, 12, 48-67, 89-114,

129-157,161 -, nichtpersonbezogener 53, 54, 56,60,61,82 -, partnerseitiger 53,54,56-59,61,101,141 -, sprecherseitiger 53, 54, 56-61, 82, 101, 141 Sprache als System 3, 4, 7, 13 Sprachentwicklung 26, 62-64, 76-78, 81,94-98 Sprachkode 89, 90, 99-113 Sprachproduktion, Grundmodell der s. Grund-

modell der Sprachproduktion Sprachpsychologie 1-5, 171 Sprachschicht I, 12, 13,63,64,89-114, 157 Sprachschichtvariation 12,89-114,157 Sprechakttheorie 4, 25, 27, 28,118 StandardaufTorderungen 132-135, 137, 155 Standardsprache 12,96-98,100,113 Strategie, distanzzentrierte 85-87 Syllogismus, psychologischer 64, 109

Topikalisierung 60

Verpflichten 122-124, 126 Verstärkungsbedingungen, asymmetrische 95,

96,98

Wahrnehmungsprozeß 38, 68-71 Wissen, deklaratives 9,10,12,27,35-37,41,61,

125,126,130,154,160,166 -, prozedurales 9,10,36,37,126,166 Wissensaktualisierung9,35-38,61, 125, 154, 166

Zentrierung 43, 44, 46 Zielsetzung s. Handlungsziel Zusatzinformation 45, 46, 110, 111

Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg NewYork

w. E. Cooper, 1. M. Sorensen

Fundamental Frequency in Sentence Production 1981. 85 figures. X, 213 pages Cloth DM 48,-ISBN 3-540-90510-3

AC. Graesser

Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word 1981. 27 figures. X, 310 pages Cloth DM 56,-ISBN 3-540-90544-8

H.Hörmann

To Mean - To Understand Problems ofPsychological Semantics Translated from the German by B. A Jankowski 1981. 5 figures. X, 337 pages Cloth DM 88,-ISBN 3-540-10448-8

H.Hörmann

Psycholinguistics An Introduction to Research and Theory Translated from the German by H. H. Stern, P. Leppmann 2nd revised edition. 1979.60 figures, 21 tables. IX, 342 pages Cloth DM 49,-ISBN 3-540-90417-4

B.Malmberg

Structural Linguistics and Human Communication An Introduction into the Mechanism ofLanguage and the Methodology ofLinguistics Reprint ofthe 2nd revised edition. 1976.88 figures. VIII, 213 pages (Kommunikation und Kybernetik in Einzel­darstellungen, Band 2) Cloth DM 60,-ISBN 3-540-03888-4

Verbal Processes in Children Progress in Cognitive Development Research Editors: C.1.Brainerd, M.Pressley 1982. Approx. 10 figures. Approx. 320 pages (Springer Series in Cognitive Development) ISBN 3-540-90648-7 In preparation

Springer Series in Language and Communication Editor: w. 1. M. Levelt

Volumel W. Klein, N. Dittmar

Developing Grammars The Acquisition ofGerman Syntax by Foreign Workers 1979.9 figures, 38 tables. X, 222 pages Cloth DM 40,-ISBN 3-540-09580-2

Volume2

The Child's Conception ofLanguage Editors: A Sinclair, R 1. Jarvella, W. 1. M. Levelt 1978.9 figures, 5 tables. IX, 268 pages Cloth DM 38,-ISBN 3-540-09153-X

Volume3 M.Miller

The Logic of Language Develop­ment in Early Childhood Translated from the German by R T. King 1979. 1 figure, 30 tables. XVI, 478 pages Cloth DM 49,-ISBN 3-540-09606-X

Volume4 L. G. M. Noordman

Inferring from Language With a Foreword by H. H. Clark 1979. 4 figures, 25 tables. XII, 170 pages Cloth DM 38,-ISBN 3-540-09386-9

Volume5 W. Noordman-Vonk

Retrieval from Semantic Memory With a Foreword by 1. C. Marshall 1979. 10 figures, 19 tables. XII, 97 pages Cloth DM 29,50 ISBN 3-540-09219-6

Volume6

Semantics from Different Points ofView Editors: R Bäuerle, U. Egli, A von Stechow 1979. 15 figures, 7 tables. VIII, 419 pages Cloth DM 49,-ISBN 3-540-09676-0

Volume7 C.E.Osgood

Lectures on Language Performance 1980. 31 figures, 33 tables. XI, 276 pages Cloth DM 42,-ISBN 3-540-09901-8

Volume8 T. Ballmer, W. Brennenstuhl

Speech Act Oassification A Study in the Lexical Analysis ofEnglish Speech Activity Verbs 1981. 4 figures. X, 274 pages Cloth DM 57,-ISBN 3-540-10294-9

Volume9 D. T.Hakes

The Development of Meta­linguistic Abilities in Children In collaboration with 1. S. Evans and W. Tunmer 1980.6 figures, 8 tables. X, 119 pages Cloth DM 38,50 ISBN 3-540-10295-7

Volume 10 R Narasimhan

Modelling Language Behavior 1981. 3 figures. XVI, 217 pages Cloth DM 56,-ISBN 3-540-10513-1

Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg NewYork