Amor en Lope

download Amor en Lope

of 17

Transcript of Amor en Lope

  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    1/17

    Revista anadiense de Estudios Hispnicos

    Fortune, Love and Power in Lope de Vega's Lo fingido verdaderoAuthor(s): J.V. BRYANSSource: Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispnicos, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Invierno 1985), pp. 133-148Published by: Revista Canadiense de Estudios HispnicosStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27762363.

    Accessed: 09/11/2014 19:07

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispnicosis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend

    access toRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispnicos.

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=rcehhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27762363?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/27762363?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=rceh
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    2/17

    J.V.

    RYANS

    Fortune,

    Love

    and

    Power

    in

    Lope

    de

    Vega's

    Lo

    fingido

    erdadero

    Muchas

    comedias

    del

    siglo

    de

    oro

    pertenecen

    a

    un

    sub-g?nero

    o

    tipo

    de

    comedia;

    algunas pertenecen

    a

    m?s

    de

    uno a

    la

    vez.

    Tal

    es

    el

    caso

    de

    Lo

    fi

    ngido

    verdadero.

    Por

    una

    parte

    pertenece

    al

    tipo

    de

    la

    comedia

    de

    tiranos,

    en

    el

    que

    un

    tirano

    que

    se

    deja

    arrastrar

    por

    sus

    pasiones

    y

    atropella

    la

    gente

    termina

    muriendo.

    En

    el

    primer

    acto

    de

    Lo

    fingido

    hay

    tres

    tiranos

    que

    muestran

    que

    si

    uno

    sigue

    sus

    pasiones

    caer? v?ctima

    de la

    Fortuna.

    Un

    cuarto

    personaje,

    Diocleciano,

    muestra

    que

    la

    virtud

    ofrece

    alguna

    pro

    tecci?n

    ante

    el

    poder

    de la

    Fortuna.

    Por

    otra

    parte

    Lo

    fingido

    es

    tambi?n

    ejemplo

    del

    tipo

    de

    comedia

    que

    puede

    llamarse la

    comedia de

    m?rtires

    en

    el

    que

    un

    buen

    pagano

    es

    convertido al

    cristianismo

    y

    luego

    martirizado.

    En

    el

    tercer acto

    la

    conversi?n

    de

    Gin?s

    muestra

    que

    el

    poder

    de Dios

    hace

    posible rechazar los valores de este mundo, tan apetecidos por losperso

    najes

    del

    primero

    acto,

    sustituir

    el

    deseo de la honra mundana

    por

    el

    deseo de la

    gloria

    divina,

    y

    adquirir

    una nueva

    virtud,

    la

    cual,

    por

    la

    infusi?n

    de

    las

    tres

    virtudes

    teologales,

    es

    superior

    a

    la virtud

    puramente

    mundana tal

    como

    la

    de Diocleciano.

    La

    combinaci?n de

    estos

    dos

    sub

    g?neros

    hace

    que

    se

    comparen

    las actitudes

    y

    el mundo de los

    paganos

    con

    las

    actitudes

    y

    el

    mundo

    de los

    cristianos.

    As?

    los

    dos

    sub-g?neros

    hacen

    de

    la comedia

    una

    rica

    experiencia

    teatral.

    In

    my

    article,

    "El

    alcalde

    de Zalamea

    y

    el

    sub-g?nero/'1

    I

    pointed

    out

    that

    the

    comedia

    possesses

    types

    or

    sub-genres

    which

    can

    be

    recognized

    by

    a

    basic

    structure

    belonging

    to

    more

    than

    one

    comedia.

    Such

    sub-genres

    do

    not,

    however,

    embrace all

    the

    production

    of

    the

    comedia.

    Certainly

    more

    comedias

    belong

    to

    a

    sub-genre

    than

    do

    not,

    but

    some

    comedias

    are

    to

    use an

    apposite

    term

    sui

    generis,

    that

    is,

    they

    constitute

    a

    sub-genre

    in

    themselves of which

    they

    are

    the

    only

    member.

    Following

    Umberto

    Eco's

    terminology

    the

    ordinary sub-genres

    can

    be

    called

    ratio

    facilis and

    the

    types

    in

    themselves

    ratio

    difficilis.2

    Now in interpretingplays which are ratio facilis it isalways advisable to

    take

    into

    account

    the

    content

    and

    meaning

    of the

    sub-generic

    structure.

    Such aid

    in

    interpretation

    is

    not

    possible

    with

    plays

    which

    are

    ratio

    difficilis,

    revista

    canadiense de

    estudios

    hisp?nicos

    Vol.

    IX,

    No.

    2 lnvierno1985

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    3/17

    134

    but these plays nearly always bear some resemblance to a play which

    belongs

    to

    an

    ordinary

    sub-genre.

    Hence,

    the resemblance

    can

    be of

    use

    in

    the

    interpretation

    of the difficult

    play,

    although

    it

    must

    not

    be assumed

    that

    the

    meaning

    of

    the

    play

    is

    limited

    by

    the

    resemblance.

    An

    example

    will

    illustrate this

    point.

    El

    villano

    en su

    rinc?n

    is

    a

    play

    which

    is

    ratio

    difficilis.

    Its

    tructure

    bears

    no

    basic

    resemblance

    to

    thatof

    any

    other

    play,

    though

    there

    are some

    resemblances

    to

    the

    peasant

    honour

    play,

    which

    is

    dealt with

    in

    my

    article

    cited

    above.

    In

    plays

    of this

    type

    and

    in

    Villano,

    the

    theme of the

    happy

    country

    life

    is

    treated,

    as

    is

    the theme of the

    peasant

    rising.

    These

    resemblances

    are

    enough

    to

    suggest

    that,

    as

    in

    the

    peasant

    honour play, one of the points made byVillano isthe need fornew blood

    at court.

    A

    further

    type

    of

    play

    which

    is

    ratio

    difficilis

    concerns me

    here.

    This

    is

    the

    type

    of

    play

    which bears resemblance

    to two

    ratio

    facilis

    sub-genres.

    One

    play

    of

    this

    kind,

    Calder?ni

    La

    exaltaci?n

    de

    la

    cruz,

    has

    already

    been

    studied

    by

    me

    (to

    be

    published

    shortly).

    The

    object

    of

    study

    of the

    present

    article

    is

    nother of these

    plays,

    Lope

    de

    Vega's

    Lo

    fingido

    verdadero.

    The first

    type

    of

    play

    to

    which

    Fingido

    bears

    a

    certain

    resemblance

    is

    the

    tyrant

    play,

    of

    which

    examples

    are

    the

    anonymous

    Tirano

    Rey

    Corbanto,

    Lope's

    Roma

    Abrasada,

    Tirso's La

    rep?blica

    al

    rev?s,

    Calder?n's

    La

    gran

    Cenobia,

    and his La

    hija

    del

    aire,

    pt.

    2. The basic structure of this

    type

    of

    play

    is

    s

    follows.

    A

    tyrant

    giving

    himself

    over

    to

    his

    passions,

    rules

    unjustly,

    wronging

    many

    people.

    For

    a

    time,

    Fortune

    favours

    him,

    but

    finally

    he

    is

    brought

    low

    by

    someone

    he

    has

    wronged.

    These

    plays

    show the

    conse

    quences

    of

    giving

    oneself

    over

    to

    one's

    passions,

    the limitations

    of human

    power,

    and the

    fickleness of

    Fortune with

    those

    who

    give

    themselves

    over

    to

    their

    passions.

    To

    stress

    this last

    point

    there

    are

    sometimes

    two sets

    of

    characters

    in

    these

    plays.

    Those who follow

    their

    passions

    and

    those

    who

    rely

    on reason

    and

    virtue,

    the

    latter

    being

    rewarded and the former

    coming

    to

    a

    bad end.3

    The

    tyrantplay

    is

    essentially

    a

    secular

    play,

    even

    when

    as

    in

    La

    rep?blica

    al

    rev?s

    it is

    set

    in

    Christian

    times. It

    is

    oncerned

    with

    this

    world rather than

    the

    next

    and

    with

    the

    worldly

    consequences

    of

    human

    actions.

    The

    tyrant

    lay

    section of

    Fingido

    is

    onfined

    mainly

    to

    the

    first

    ct.

    Here

    one

    encounters not

    one

    but three

    tyrants

    ll of whom illustrate the

    conse

    quences

    of

    giving

    oneself

    over

    to

    one's

    passions.

    The first

    f

    these

    is

    Aurelio who

    is

    driven

    by

    a

    passion

    for

    power

    and

    glory.

    So

    great

    is

    this

    passion

    that

    he

    openly

    challenges

    the

    Gods,

    putting

    no

    limit

    to

    his

    pretensions.

    T?,

    cielo,

    descompones

    ej?rcito

    romano;

    ?qu?

    es

    aquesto?

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    4/17

    135

    Si a

    deshacer

    te

    pones

    el orden

    por

    sus

    c?nsules

    compuesto,

    nunca

    despu?s

    te

    espantes

    si te

    movieren

    guerra

    los

    gigantes.

    Vive,

    J?piter

    santo,

    que

    si

    ponemos

    monte

    sobre

    monte,

    que

    te

    he de

    dar

    espanto;

    fulm?name

    despu?s

    como

    a

    Tifonte,

    con

    tal

    que

    mi

    venganza

    ponga

    al

    poder

    de

    tu

    furor

    templanza.

    A tu

    suprema

    esfera

    osar?

    levantar

    mil

    escuadrones

    de

    gente

    armada

    y

    fiera.

    (i, pp.

    173b-74a)4

    Immediately

    after

    this,

    the limitations of

    human

    power

    and

    the

    conse

    quences

    of

    passion

    are

    made

    clear. Aurelio

    is

    struck

    by

    a

    bolt

    of

    lightning.

    Carino,

    the

    Roman

    emperor,

    is

    nother

    tyrant

    figure.

    His

    passion

    is

    lust.

    Dicen

    que

    vive

    en

    Roma

    deshonesto,

    forzando lasmujeres

    mas

    honradas,

    sin

    que

    se

    escapen

    senadores

    desto,

    ni

    las

    monjas

    a

    Vesta

    reservadas...

    (i,

    pp.

    171b-72a)

    Carino

    also

    puts

    no

    limits

    n

    the

    power

    of

    an

    emperor

    such

    as

    himself.

    Celio

    makes the

    following

    comparison

    between

    Carino

    and

    the

    actresses

    in

    Gin?s's

    troop.

    ?Luego

    t?

    piensas

    que

    reinas

    con

    mayor

    estimaci?n?

    La diferencia sabida,

    es

    que

    les dura hora

    y

    media

    su

    comedia,

    y

    tu

    comedia

    te

    dura toda

    la

    vida.

    T?

    representas

    tambi?n,

    mas

    est?s

    de

    rey

    vestido

    hasta la

    muerte

    ...

    (i,

    p. 175a)

    To

    this

    Carino

    indignantly

    replies:

    ...

    yo,

    que

    de veras

    soy

    Rey,

    por

    mi

    dichosa

    suerte,

    ser?lo

    en

    vida

    y

    en

    muerte;

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    5/17

    136

    de vivir

    seguro estoy

    por

    mis a?os

    y

    salud,

    por

    mis

    fuerzas

    y

    valor,

    y

    por

    ser

    emperador,

    que

    es

    otra

    mayor

    virtud.

    ?Qu?

    es

    muerte?

    ?Qu?

    desatino

    es

    decir

    que

    muere un

    Rey?

    No

    llega

    la

    humana

    ley

    al

    emperador

    Carino.

    Es

    cosa

    de

    risa

    hacer

    filosof?as

    en

    eso,

    ni

    puede

    humano

    suceso

    contra

    el divino

    poder.

    Somos los

    emperadores,

    como

    sab?is,

    casi

    iguales

    a

    los

    dioses celestiales:

    somos

    del

    mundo

    se?ores,

    como

    ellos lo

    son

    del cielo

    ...

    (i, p. 175b)

    But shortly the consequences of passion and the limitations of man's

    power

    are

    again

    shown,

    when

    a

    wronged

    husband

    kills

    Carino.

    Now,

    Carino

    recognizes

    the central

    truth f the

    play

    that

    life

    is

    no

    more

    real

    than

    the

    theatre.

    Represent?

    mi

    figura:

    C?sar

    fui,

    Roma,

    Rey

    era;

    acab?se la

    tragedia,

    la

    muerte

    me

    desnud?:

    sospecho

    que

    no

    dur?

    todami vida hora ymedia. ( , p. 178a)

    The third

    tyrant

    figure,

    Apro,

    is

    less well

    developed.

    His

    passion

    for

    power

    is

    uch that he

    murders the

    popular

    and

    virtuous

    Numeriano.

    Apro

    feels

    that

    his

    popularity

    with

    the

    soldiers

    will

    see

    him

    through,

    but

    he

    is

    mistaken.

    Some

    officers

    are

    shocked

    by

    the

    murder,

    giving

    Diocletian the

    opportunity

    to

    kill him.

    All

    these

    events

    are

    seen

    to

    take

    place

    under

    the

    sway

    of

    Fortune.

    In

    the

    second

    act

    Diocletian

    tellsMaximiano:

    Maximiano, la fortuna

    levanta

    o

    baja

    a

    quien

    quiere:

    unos

    deja,

    otros

    prefiere,

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    6/17

    137

    sin

    tener

    firmeza

    alguna.

    Tiene

    este

    inmenso

    poder

    en

    las

    cosas

    temporales,

    no en

    las

    almas

    celestiales,...

    (n,

    p.

    182a)

    But

    Fortune

    is

    not

    portrayed

    as as

    fickle

    as

    Diocletian

    states,

    even

    though

    the

    death

    of Numeriano shows

    that

    it

    has

    some

    sway

    even

    over

    the

    good.

    As is

    the

    case

    with

    some

    other

    characters

    in

    tyrant

    lays,

    all

    three

    characters

    who died

    were

    led

    astray

    by

    their

    passions,

    making

    themselves

    subject

    to

    Fortune.

    By

    contrast

    the character who triumphs

    over

    Fortune, Diocletian,

    is

    a man

    who

    is

    not

    without

    an

    elementary

    virtue,

    demonstrating

    that

    virtue

    gives

    some

    protection

    against

    Fortune,

    another

    point

    made

    in

    some

    tyrant

    plays.

    He is

    bove all

    else

    a man

    who

    keeps

    his

    passions

    in

    heck. At

    no

    time

    in

    the

    play

    does

    he

    give

    way

    to

    them,

    even

    when he has

    to sentence

    Gin?s.

    He

    is

    quite

    conscious of the need

    to

    control the

    passions.

    He

    tellsMaxi

    miano

    "Hablad

    sin

    pasi?n

    /

    y

    volved

    a

    decir bien

    /

    del

    C?sar"

    (

    ,

    p.

    172b).

    Because

    of

    this

    control

    of his

    passions

    what he does

    is

    rational and

    calculated.

    Thus

    early

    in

    the first

    ct,

    he

    provokes

    the soldiers

    to

    slander

    Aureliano and then quickly changes his tune. The whole episode gives the

    impression

    of

    careful

    planning.

    Dioc.

    -

    Ayudadme

    a

    decir

    a

    Aurelio afrentas.

    Maxim.

    -?Es

    un

    caduco?

    Curio.-

    Es

    un

    borracho.

    Marc-

    Es

    loco.

    Dioc.

    -

    Es

    el

    Emperador:

    hablemos

    paso,

    que

    no se

    ha de

    tener

    el

    cetro

    en

    poco,

    aunque

    le

    tenga

    un

    b?rbaro

    Circaso.

    Curio. -

    ?T?

    no nos

    provocaste?

    Dioc.

    -

    Si

    os

    provoco

    ya

    me

    arrepiento.

    (i,

    p.

    172a)

    Similarly,

    his decision

    to

    kill

    Apro

    is

    based

    on a

    well-calculated risk.

    Dioc.

    -

    ...

    si

    el

    campo

    se

    enoja

    y

    me

    quitasen

    la

    vida

    ...

    Mas

    ?qu?

    vida

    me

    reporta

    donde

    tanto

    se

    aventura?

    Los

    soldados

    se

    conforman

    y

    le

    quieren

    admitir

    por

    Emperador

    de

    Roma.

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    7/17

    138

    Tente, mano;

    ?d?nde

    vas?

    Mira

    que

    nadie

    te

    abona;

    que soy

    hijo

    de

    un

    esclavo;

    pero

    lo

    que

    intente

    sobra

    para ganar

    fama

    eterna,

    si

    en

    tierra

    o

    mar

    peligrosa

    por ganar

    fama

    peleo,

    y

    esta

    vida,

    siempre

    corta,

    pongo

    a

    tan

    cierto

    peligro

    por

    un

    Imperio

    y

    corona,

    y

    no menos

    que

    del

    mundo,

    ?qu?

    muerte

    con

    mayor

    honra?

    (i,

    pp.180b-81a)

    Another

    significant

    virtue

    of Diocletian

    is

    that he

    is

    a

    good

    actor.5

    In

    the

    scene

    just

    quoted

    with the

    soldiers

    he

    is

    clearly

    acting

    a

    part.

    Just

    efore

    he

    kills

    Apro

    he tells

    him,

    presumbably

    to

    impress

    the

    listeners:

    ...

    la

    imagen

    espantosa

    de

    Numeriano,

    tu

    yerno,

    convertida

    en

    negra sombra,

    anoche

    me

    apareci?,

    y

    me

    dijo

    con voz ronca

    que

    de

    su

    sangre

    ?nocente

    diese

    esta

    venganza

    a

    Roma.

    (i,

    p.

    181a)

    Finally,

    Diocletian

    is

    a man

    of

    his

    word.

    He

    keeps

    his

    promise

    10

    share

    the

    empire

    with

    Maximiano,

    even

    showing

    or

    pretending

    to

    show

    a

    kind

    of

    love.

    He tellsMaximiano:

    ...

    el querer

    iguala

    el

    que

    ama a

    lo

    amado,

    y

    el

    amado

    juntamente

    al

    que

    ama,

    y

    amando,

    es

    bien

    partir contigo

    tambi?n

    este

    laurel

    e

    mi

    frente.

    n,

    p.

    182b)

    Similarly

    he

    keeps

    his

    promise

    to

    Camila.

    Of

    course

    this last

    virtue

    may

    be

    pure

    acting,

    and Diocletian's

    virtues

    are

    minimal and

    severely

    flawed

    by

    his

    murder of

    Apro.

    Nonetheless

    his

    control of his

    passions

    is

    real and

    is

    sufficientvirtue to explain his triumph over Fortune.

    The

    great

    reward for

    Diocletian which

    comes

    out

    of

    his

    triumph

    over

    Fortune

    is

    honour.

    It

    was

    honour that

    motivated

    him

    to

    kill

    Apro,

    and

    as

    emperor

    he

    receives

    all the honours

    which

    are

    his

    due him.

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    8/17

    139

    Maxim. -El verte, invicto se?or

    coronado

    Emperador

    fue

    causa

    de

    este

    desv?o;

    ya

    tu

    sacra

    majestad

    tiene

    tan

    alto

    el

    asiento,

    que

    el

    humano

    pensamiento

    le considera

    deidad.

    (n,

    p.

    182a)

    Gin?s.

    -

    Si

    tus

    glorias,

    si

    tus

    grandes

    haza?as,

    si

    tu raro

    divino entendimiento, C?sar ?nclito,

    fuera

    capaz

    de

    versos

    y

    de

    historias,

    Gin?s

    representara

    tu

    alabanza,

    y

    todos

    los

    ingenios

    que

    celebra,

    no

    solo

    Roma,

    pero

    Espa?a

    y

    Grecia,

    se

    ocuparan,

    se?or,

    en

    escribillas.

    (u,

    p.

    183b)

    In

    Golden

    Age

    plays

    such

    honours

    are

    par

    excellence the

    goods

    which

    Fortune

    gives.

    To

    sum

    up

    the

    tyrant

    play

    part

    of

    the

    play,

    it

    gives

    a

    grim

    picture

    of the lot

    of

    humanity.

    Life is as brief and unreal as a

    play

    and it isdominated

    by

    Fortune

    which does

    not

    always

    spare

    the

    good.

    In

    the

    world

    presented

    in

    the

    play,

    most

    men

    follow

    their

    passions

    and

    so

    become

    the victims

    of

    Fortune.

    But,

    by

    following

    virtue,

    however

    elementary

    and

    imperfect,

    there

    is

    ome

    hope

    of

    overcoming

    Fortune. This

    is

    picture

    of

    what

    N. M.

    Valis has called "that

    portion

    of

    humanity

    which

    the Christian

    calls

    unre

    deemed

    by

    divine

    grace,"6

    and

    it

    ets

    the

    context

    of Gin?s's

    conversion,

    and

    provides

    material for

    later

    contrasts

    with the

    Christian

    view

    of the

    world.

    The

    second

    part

    of

    the

    play

    to

    be considered takes

    place mainly

    in

    the

    second

    act

    and

    bears

    no

    relation

    to

    any

    type

    of

    play,

    as

    might

    be

    expected

    in

    a

    ratio

    difficilis

    play.

    This section of the

    play

    concerns

    Gin?s's

    love for

    Marcela

    and

    prefigures

    his love forGod

    in

    the third

    act.

    Love

    can

    be

    a

    noble

    sentiment

    or

    it

    an

    be,

    as

    Camila

    points

    out

    in

    the

    third

    act,

    a

    wild

    beast

    (in,

    p.

    194b).

    Gin?s's love

    for

    Marcela

    is

    not

    a

    gentle

    emotion,

    but

    it s

    essentially

    noble,

    and has

    noble

    effects. Gin?s

    cares more

    for

    the

    welfare ofMarcela

    than

    for the

    satisfaction of

    his

    own

    desires. Thus

    Gin?s

    refuses

    to

    ask

    Marcela's

    father for her hand

    because:

    Casarse viendo querer,

    ni

    es

    honor

    ni

    discreci?n;

    que

    los casamientos

    son

    uni?n

    de las

    voluntades,

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    9/17

    140

    y en distintas calidades

    es

    imposible

    la

    uni?n.

    (n,

    p. 186a)

    And after

    Marcela and

    Octavio

    run

    off,

    he

    forgives

    them

    and

    has

    them

    married.

    At

    the

    same

    time, however,

    love alienates

    Gin?s

    from himself. Because

    of

    love,

    Gin?s

    sees

    himself

    not

    as

    a

    whole

    man,

    but

    as

    split

    up

    into

    different

    senses

    and

    faculties,

    and

    he

    sees

    these

    as

    actors in

    a

    play.

    ...

    comedia

    es

    mi

    voluntad,

    poeta el entendimiento

    de la f?bula

    que

    intento,

    donde

    con

    versos

    famosos

    pinta

    los

    pasos

    forzosos

    que

    ha dado

    mi

    pensamiento.

    Todos

    mis

    locos

    sentidos,

    con

    figuras

    semejantes,

    se

    han hecho

    representantes

    de

    mis

    afectos

    rendidos;

    representan

    mis

    o?dos

    un

    sordo

    que

    a

    la

    raz?n

    no

    quiere

    dar atenci?n.

    Y

    mis

    tristes

    jos

    luego

    van

    representando

    un

    ciego

    que

    anda

    a rezar su

    pasi?n.

    (u,

    p.

    185a)

    Again

    slightly

    later

    he

    says

    "Pues v?stanse

    mis

    sentidos

    /

    representen

    por

    m?"

    (il,

    .

    186a).

    Referring

    to

    his

    acting,

    Gin?s

    tells Diocletian:

    ...

    de toda el

    alma

    quit?

    los

    sentidos

    y

    potencias,

    que

    se

    calza

    como

    guantes

    seg?n

    se

    ajustan

    en

    ellas...

    (n, p.

    187b)

    This

    alienation

    by

    love

    involving

    acting by

    parts

    of

    Gin?s is

    variant

    on

    the

    central

    theatre

    metaphor

    of

    the

    play.

    Another

    significant

    effect of love

    is

    that

    it

    makes

    reality

    rush

    in to

    shatter

    dramatic

    illusion. When he

    is

    playing

    the

    part

    of

    Rufino with

    Marcela,

    Gin?s

    cannot

    stop

    himself

    from

    breaking

    out

    of

    his

    part

    and

    talking

    to

    her

    de veras.

    Marc-

    Gin?s

    ?representas?

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    10/17

    141

    Gin?s.

    -

    S?

    Mi

    pena

    a

    quien

    mal

    me

    trata.

    Marc-

    ?C?mo

    me

    llamas

    Marcela,

    si

    soy

    Fabia?

    Gin?s.- Por

    hablarte

    de

    veras,

    por

    obligarte

    a

    que

    tu

    desd?n

    se

    duela

    de

    aqueste

    mi

    loco

    amor.

    (ii, p.

    188b)

    This

    rushing

    in

    f

    reality

    has

    partly

    as

    its

    urpose

    to

    make

    further

    play

    on

    the

    theatre

    metaphor,

    but

    it

    lso

    has another effect.

    By

    showing

    a

    real love

    breaking through

    the illusion of

    a

    dramatic

    performance,

    it

    points

    to

    the

    higher

    reality

    f

    love.

    For

    Lope,

    who

    was

    influenced

    by

    the

    Neo-Platonists,

    love

    was

    not

    just

    another

    passion,

    it

    as one

    of the

    ultimate

    realities of the

    universe.

    Hence,

    this

    irruption

    of love

    into

    dramatic

    illusion

    points

    to

    the

    higher

    reality

    to

    which love

    will

    eventually

    lead Gin?s.

    Another

    significant

    effect of love

    is

    lso found

    in

    Gin?s's

    breaking

    out

    of

    his

    r?le: love

    makes

    him

    commit

    an

    act

    of

    folly.

    He

    himself

    refers

    to

    his

    'loco

    amor" and Marcela reminds

    him

    that

    Caesar

    is

    watching,

    as

    Gin?s

    speaks to herde veras "Esto no est? en lacomedia; /mira el que C?sar nos

    mira."

    (il,

    .

    188b). By

    what he

    is

    doing

    he

    is

    therefore

    risking

    his

    professional

    reputation.

    The

    risk

    is

    slight

    as

    Gin?s

    has

    a

    reputation

    for

    improvising,

    but

    it

    is

    real

    enough

    to

    point

    to

    the truth

    that love makes

    men

    ignore

    ordinary

    calculations

    of

    right

    conduct and

    step

    outside

    imposed

    roles. This

    folly

    prefigures

    Gin?s's

    Christian

    "folly"

    in

    the third

    act.

    But if

    uman love has noble effects and

    participates

    in

    higher

    love,

    it

    is

    also

    profoundly

    flawed

    as

    is

    shown

    by

    Gin?s's

    alienation

    and

    by

    Marcela's

    failure

    to

    reciprocate

    Gin?s's love.

    Human

    love

    must

    give

    way

    to

    that

    more

    perfect

    love,

    the divine

    love

    for which it

    is

    a

    preparation,

    and Gin?s's

    alienation must be cured before he can turn toGod. Accordingly, early

    in

    the third

    act,

    he shows himself

    profoundly

    disillusioned with

    human

    love

    in

    palinode,

    the Petrarchan

    type

    of

    sonnet

    in

    which the

    poet

    recants

    his

    servitude

    to

    love.

    Amor

    me

    puso

    en

    tanta

    desventura

    la verde

    primavera

    de

    mis

    a?os,

    que

    pens?

    por

    el

    mar

    de

    sus

    enga?os

    en

    vez

    del

    puerto

    hallar la

    sepultura.

    Y

    aunque

    este

    fuego

    en

    las

    cenizas

    dura,

    ya

    con menos

    vigor

    siento

    sus

    da?os;

    am?

    con

    celos,

    mas con

    desenga?os

    no

    pienso

    que

    es

    amor,

    sino

    locura.

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    11/17

    142

    Bien pueden mientras viven enga?ados

    confesarse

    en

    la fe

    de

    amor

    fingido,

    de

    un

    ofendido

    amante

    los cuidados.

    ?Y

    qu?

    importa

    ue

    quiera

    el ofendido?

    Que

    quien

    ama con

    celos

    declarados,

    ya

    llega

    los

    principios

    del

    olvido.

    (m,

    p.

    195b)

    Nonetheless,

    the transition from human love

    to

    divine love

    isnot

    abrupt.

    Almost

    immediately

    after the

    palinode,

    Gin?s

    flirts

    ith

    Marcela.

    The

    ashes

    are,

    as

    he

    says,

    still

    hot,

    but

    his

    alienation

    is

    t

    an

    end.

    Confirmation

    for the

    preceding

    interpretation

    of Gin?s's love

    is

    found

    in

    another

    religious

    play

    by

    Lope,

    Los

    locos

    por

    el

    cielo,

    which,

    as

    will

    be

    seen,

    belongs

    to

    the

    other

    sub-genre

    to

    which

    Fingido

    is

    related.

    The

    heroine

    Dona

    loves

    Ind?s,

    but

    after her

    conversion,

    she also

    expresses

    her

    disillusionment with

    human

    love

    in

    palinode

    which

    begins:

    Gran

    tiempo

    me

    ha tenido

    amor

    humano,

    en

    tu

    intricada red

    preso

    el

    sentido,

    que

    como

    vanas

    leyes

    he

    seguido,

    tambi?n era mi amor incierto y vano. (i, p. 117b)7

    After

    Ind?s's conversion

    both

    take

    a

    vow

    of

    chastity

    but maintain their love

    for

    one

    another.

    Again,

    therefore,

    human

    love

    is

    as

    a

    prelude

    to

    higher

    love,

    prefiguring

    both

    Dona's

    chaste

    love for Ind?s and her

    love

    for

    God.

    The

    second kind of

    play

    to

    which

    Fingido

    is

    related

    is

    the

    martyr

    play,

    examples

    of

    which

    are

    Lope's

    Los

    locos

    por

    el

    cielo,

    Calder?ni

    Los

    dos

    amantes

    del

    cielo,

    and

    his

    El

    m?gico

    prodigioso.

    The

    basic

    structure

    of the

    martyr

    play

    is

    as

    follows:

    a

    good

    pagan

    is

    converted

    to

    Christianity

    and

    then

    martyred,

    thewhole

    process

    illustrating

    the

    power

    of

    God.

    In

    Lope's

    Los locos por el cielo, for instance, the

    pagan

    is ona. God's

    power

    is een

    in

    the

    rapidity

    of her

    conversion

    and

    in

    the

    way

    he

    answers

    her initial

    prayer.

    ?

    y,

    mi

    Cristo,

    que

    no

    s?

    a

    d?nde

    os

    tengo

    de

    hallar

    Pero

    ven?sme

    a

    buscar:

    sin

    duda

    que

    os

    hallar?.

    (

    ,

    p. 115a)

    Shortly afterwards aChristian lady,Agapes, comes to see her and takes her

    to

    the

    priest

    Cirilo. God's

    power

    is

    lso

    seen

    in

    many

    miraculous

    interven

    tions

    in

    Locos.

    Such miraculous

    interventions

    are

    frequent

    in

    martyr

    plays.

    The

    purpose

    of the

    martyr

    play

    is

    to

    restore

    some

    of

    its

    pristine

    simplicity

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    12/17

    143

    to the Christian faith and thereby tomake more robust the faith of the

    audience.

    It

    also

    is

    designed

    to

    have

    a

    shaming

    effect

    on

    the audience.

    They

    are

    meant to

    ask themselves:

    "If

    a

    pagan

    can

    acquire

    such faith and

    such fortitude

    so

    rapidly,

    why

    are

    my

    faith

    and

    my

    willingness

    to

    suffer for

    Christ

    so

    weak."

    Gin?s's

    conversion

    shows God's

    power

    in

    a

    number of

    ways.

    Firstly,

    s

    with other

    figures

    in

    martyr

    plays,

    the

    extreme

    rapidity

    of

    his conversion

    shows the miraculous

    power

    of God's

    grace.

    Gin?s

    is

    rehearsing

    his

    part

    in

    the

    play

    about the Christian

    with

    great

    professional

    detachment,

    when he

    is

    surprised

    to

    find

    that

    it

    ncludes

    a

    reference

    to

    baptism

    which

    was

    not in

    the scriptand he hears applause and music. He continues to rehearse until

    he

    gets

    to

    the

    point

    of

    mentioning

    imitating

    the

    Christian,

    whereupon

    he

    hears

    a

    voice which

    says

    "No le

    imitar?s

    en

    vano,

    /

    Gin?s;

    que

    te

    has

    de

    salvar"

    (ih,

    p.

    197a).

    The effect of the voice

    is

    to

    bring

    about

    Gin?s's

    conversion:

    Gin?s.

    -

    Aunque

    en

    burlas,

    con

    mal

    celo,

    Gin?s,

    imitar

    esperas

    a

    los

    cristianos,

    recelo

    que

    debe de

    ser

    de

    veras

    ir

    los

    cristianos

    al cielo.

    La

    voz

    que

    todo

    mi

    o?do

    me ma

    penetrado

    el

    sentido,

    sospecho

    que

    fuera

    bien

    pensar que

    es

    Cristo,

    si

    es

    quien

    me

    ha tocado

    y

    me

    ha movido.

    Cristo

    dicen

    que

    baj?

    del

    cielo,

    y

    que

    carne

    humana

    en

    una

    Virgen

    tom?;

    su

    grandeza

    soberana

    a

    nuestra

    humildad

    junt?,

    y

    que

    esta

    parte

    mortal

    sufri?

    por

    el hombre

    muerte

    afrentosa.

    (m,

    p.

    197a-b)

    The

    speed

    with which this

    conversion

    occurs

    is

    such that

    it

    has

    something

    almost

    shocking

    about

    it.One

    moment

    Gin?s

    is

    acting

    the

    part

    of

    a

    Christian,

    and

    the

    next moment

    he

    is

    a

    Christian. The shock of

    this

    conversion

    serves

    to

    amplify

    God's

    power.

    God's power is lso shown intheway Gin?s's first rayer is nswered. In

    an

    aparte

    he

    prays

    "?Cristo

    m?o,

    pues

    sois

    Dios,

    /

    vos me

    llevar?is

    a

    vos,

    /

    que

    yo

    desde ahora

    os

    sigo "

    (in,

    .

    198a).

    And

    a

    little ater

    an

    angel

    appears

    to

    baptize

    him

    during

    the

    performance.

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    13/17

    144

    Dios

    oy?

    tu

    pensamiento,

    que

    Dios

    su

    lenguaje

    entiende,

    Gin?s,

    y

    lo

    ue

    pretende

    tu

    alma,

    le

    da

    contento.

    Sube, sube,

    llega

    a

    verme;

    que

    te

    quiero

    bautizar.

    (m,

    p.

    199b)

    Such

    prayers

    along

    with

    rapid

    answers are

    found

    in

    nearly

    every

    martyr

    play.

    Another manifestation of God's

    power

    is

    to

    make Gin?s

    give

    up

    worldly

    ways of thinking and think according toGod's way of thinking,which is

    folly

    to

    the

    world,

    as

    St.

    Paul

    points

    out in

    his first

    etter

    to

    the

    Corinthians,

    I,

    verses

    18

    to

    27.

    "The doctrine of the

    cross

    is

    heer

    folly

    to

    those

    on

    their

    way

    to

    ruin,

    but

    to

    us

    who

    are on

    the

    way

    to

    salvation

    it s

    the

    power

    of God.

    Scripture

    says:

    will

    destroy

    thewisdom of the

    wise,

    and

    bring

    to

    nothing

    the cleverness

    of the clever.'Where

    is

    your

    wise

    man

    now,

    your

    man

    of

    learning,

    or

    your

    subtle

    debate-limited,

    all of

    them,to

    this

    passingage?

    God has

    made the

    wisdom of thisworld look foolish.

    As

    God

    in

    his

    wisdom

    ordained,

    the

    world failed

    to

    find

    him

    by

    its

    wisdom,

    and

    he

    chose

    to

    save

    those who

    have faith inthe folly f theGospel. Jewscall formiracles, Greeks look for

    wisdom;

    but

    we

    proclaim

    Christ

    -

    yes,

    Christ nailed

    to

    the

    cross;

    and

    though

    this

    is

    stumbling-block

    to

    the

    Jews

    and

    folly

    to

    the

    Greeks,

    yet

    to

    those who have heard

    his

    call,

    Jews

    and Greeks

    alike,

    he

    is

    the

    power

    of

    God

    and the wisdom of God.

    Divine

    folly

    is

    wiser

    than the wisdom of

    man,

    and divine weakness

    stronger

    than man's

    strength

    ...

    to

    shame

    the

    wise,

    God has chosen what

    the

    world

    counts

    folly

    ..."8

    Because

    of his

    new

    way

    of

    thinking,

    Gin?s

    totally rejects

    the

    worldly

    honour

    once

    important

    to

    him

    (see

    I,

    .

    176a)

    and

    so

    important

    to

    Diocle

    tian. Inthe

    passage

    following,

    Gin?s is

    following

    the

    script,

    butwe can take

    it

    hat

    he

    means

    what he

    says.

    Contento

    a

    la

    muerte

    voy.

    Y

    aunque,

    por

    Cristo,

    no

    siento

    por

    afrenta la

    prisi?n,

    habl?

    con

    estimaci?n

    humana,

    y ya

    me

    arrepiento.

    Maltratadme,

    despreciadme,

    mostrad

    en

    m?

    vuestras

    furias,

    decidme infamias

    e

    injurias,

    y

    a

    vuestro

    gusto

    llevadme;

    que por

    Cristo

    todo

    es

    gloria.

    (ni, p. 199a)

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    14/17

    145

    Now he prefers the glory of Christ, as is lso shown by his pride inbeing a

    member

    of Christ's

    heavenly

    company

    of

    actors

    (in,

    .

    203a).

    Clearly

    such

    rejection

    of

    worldly

    honour

    would

    be

    an

    act

    of

    folly

    to

    a

    man

    such

    as

    Diocletian.

    Another

    act

    of

    folly

    f

    Gin?s

    is

    to

    break

    out

    of

    his

    r?le,

    denounce

    himself

    as

    a

    Christian

    to

    Diocletian,

    and

    to

    insult

    him.

    ("De

    veras

    hablo,

    tiranos,"

    m,

    p.

    201a).

    This

    is

    f

    course

    a

    highly

    rational

    act.

    Gin?s

    desires

    martyrdom

    and

    in

    denouncing

    himself,

    he

    is

    fulfilling

    God's

    will.

    But

    to

    anyone

    not

    a

    Christian

    and,

    one

    suspects,

    to

    some

    members

    of

    Lope's

    audience,

    such

    an

    act

    would be

    sheer

    folly

    in

    its

    total

    rejection

    of

    life,

    worldly

    goods,

    and

    worldly honour.

    This

    last

    ct

    of Christian

    folly

    was

    prepared

    for

    by

    Gin?s's

    amorous

    folly,

    even

    though

    it is

    far

    more

    rational.

    Through

    that

    amorous

    folly

    Gin?s

    broke

    out

    of

    the r?le

    imposed

    on

    him

    by

    his

    part

    in

    the

    play.

    Now he

    completely

    rejects

    his r?le

    in

    the

    world,

    that

    of

    actor,

    and

    freely

    assumes

    that

    of

    martyr.

    This

    change

    is

    prefigured

    in

    speech

    in

    which

    he

    accepts

    his

    new

    r?le

    and

    its

    otal

    rejection

    of

    worldly

    values:

    ?Pues

    no

    ves

    que

    el

    cielo

    me

    apunta

    ya,

    desde

    que

    a un

    ?ngel

    o?

    detr?s

    de

    su

    azul

    cortina:

    "Camina, Gin?s;

    camina,

    Gin?s,

    que

    ?l

    lo

    dice as??"

    Estaba el

    papel

    errado:

    donde Dios decir

    ten?a

    demonio,

    amigos,

    dec?a,

    y

    donde

    gracia,

    pecado;

    donde cielo

    hermoso,

    infierno,

    donde

    si

    errara

    me

    fuera,

    donde

    vida,

    muerte

    fiera,

    donde

    gloria,

    llanto

    eterno;

    pero

    despu?s

    que

    apunt?

    el

    ?ngel

    del

    vestuario

    del

    cielo,

    y

    lo

    necesario

    para

    acertar

    me

    ense??,

    yo

    dije

    a

    Dios

    mi

    papel

    desde el

    punto

    de

    aquel

    d?a,... (ni,

    p. 200b)

    A furthermanifestation of God's power isthe breaking through of his

    higher

    reality

    into

    the

    complex

    tangle

    of

    realities

    in

    the

    play.

    Just

    s

    love

    broke

    through

    theatrical

    illusion

    in

    the

    second

    act,

    so

    now

    his

    higher

    love,

    the

    ultimate

    reality,

    breaks

    through

    both dramatic

    illusion

    and

    that of

    the

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    15/17

    146

    theatre of theworld and orders Gin?s;s life ina new way, setting him in

    touch with

    heaven,

    a

    world whose

    reality

    is

    far bove the

    shifting

    sands

    of

    Fortune

    and

    whose values have

    a

    solidity

    that

    this

    world

    cannot

    know.

    Another

    important

    aspect

    of God's

    power

    is

    his

    mastery

    over

    Fortune.

    Using

    dramatic

    irony,

    Lope

    has Camila

    say

    in

    the third

    act,

    before

    the

    "play:"

    Ved

    lo

    que

    puede

    la

    fortuna

    varia,

    que

    a

    unos

    levanta

    y

    a

    otros

    aniquila;

    ?en

    qu?

    piensa

    parar

    esta

    voltaria,

    que ya vuela en maroma, y ya en esfera

    del viento?

    (m, p. 198a)

    But,

    it

    isnot

    Fortune

    who

    raises

    up

    Gin?s,

    but God.

    Hence

    Lope

    suggests

    that

    God's

    power

    is

    bove that

    of

    Fortune,

    even

    if

    ortune holds

    some

    sway

    over

    the

    world.

    Finally,

    God's

    power

    is

    shown

    to

    infuse

    into Gin?s

    the

    theological

    virtues.

    Gin?s

    states

    at

    the end of

    the

    play:

    ...

    voy

    al cielo

    a

    que

    me

    paguen,

    que

    de mi fe

    y

    esperanza

    y

    mi

    caridad

    notable,

    debo al

    cielo,

    y

    ?l

    me

    debe

    estos tres

    particulares.

    (ni,

    p.

    204b)

    These

    infused

    virtues

    make

    Gin?s's virtue

    far

    higher

    than

    the

    flawed

    and

    purely

    human

    virtue

    of Diocletian.

    The

    coming

    together

    of the

    two

    sub-genres

    in

    Fingido

    and

    the

    second

    act

    produces

    a

    theme which

    is

    rich

    in ontrasts.

    The

    tyrant-play

    part

    of the

    play presents

    the

    world of

    Fortune,

    with

    its

    heatre-like

    instability,

    imitation

    of man's

    pretensions

    and

    hollow

    regard

    for

    worldly

    honour.

    Here,

    with

    luck,

    a man

    having

    a

    minimum

    of

    imperfect

    virtue

    may

    succeed,

    though

    most

    men

    follow their

    passions

    and fall

    victim

    to

    Fortune.

    The second

    act

    points

    through

    human love

    to

    a

    higher reality

    nd the

    martyr-play

    section,

    contrasting

    strongly

    with

    the

    tyrant

    play

    section,

    and

    explores

    the

    nature

    of

    that

    reality

    and

    its

    ffects

    on

    those who

    come

    in

    contact

    with

    it.God's

    power

    ultimately

    controls

    Fortune,

    though

    some

    of

    its

    effects

    remain.

    God's

    love and

    power

    lead

    to

    the solid and

    enduring

    world of

    heaven and

    also

    to

    the

    higher

    reality

    of the intervention

    of

    His

    love

    in

    the

    world

    to

    transformmankind. God's power makes itpossible to reject the values of

    the

    world,

    to

    substitute

    a

    desire for

    heavenly

    glory

    for

    a

    desire

    for

    worldly

    honour,

    and

    to

    acquire

    a new

    virtue,

    which,

    by

    the

    infusion

    of

    the three

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    16/17

    147

    theological virtues, isfar above the virtue of the world. God's power also

    gives

    a

    rationality

    which,

    though

    it

    eems

    folly

    to

    the

    world,

    is

    inspired

    by

    divine

    wisdom.

    Finally

    God

    makes

    it

    possible

    to

    play

    one's

    r?le

    in

    life ith

    a

    new

    validity

    based

    on

    lasting

    values.

    The

    richness

    of

    this

    theme

    is

    fully

    exploited by

    Lope

    by

    means

    of

    techniques

    which

    approximate

    to

    Brechtian

    Verfremdungseffekt

    and make

    this

    play

    a

    brilliant

    theatrical

    masterpiece.

    The

    use

    of

    the

    theatre

    metaphor

    in

    the first

    ct

    makes the

    audience

    aware

    that the

    theatre

    of

    the world

    is

    inside

    Lope's

    theatre and

    outside

    it

    ith them.

    The

    theatrical

    alienation of

    Gin?s

    and the

    plays-within-a-play

    interrupted by

    the

    irruption

    of

    a

    reality

    which isstillwithin a

    play

    draw the audience's attention not

    only

    to the

    theatre of the

    world,

    but

    to

    levels of

    reality

    within

    the

    play.

    The total

    effect

    is

    f

    a

    carefully

    controlled confusion which

    reminds the

    audience

    that

    they

    are

    in

    a

    theatre and thus

    prevents

    them

    from

    identifying

    too

    closely

    with

    the characters

    and from

    beingtoo caught

    up

    in

    the

    dramatic illusion of the

    play.

    This

    distancing

    effect makes

    it

    asier

    for them

    to

    stand

    back

    from the

    play

    and

    analyze

    its

    heme.

    The full

    significance

    of

    the

    two

    sub-genres

    brought together

    in

    Fingido

    emerges

    when

    the

    present

    study

    of the

    play

    is

    onsidered

    in

    light

    f

    Lope's

    age.

    The Renaissance

    had been

    an

    age

    of

    secularization,

    and

    Lope's

    own

    age

    inherited

    that

    secularization,

    as

    the

    existence

    of the

    tyrant-play

    proves.

    There

    is

    also inherent

    in

    man a

    tendency

    towards

    secularization.

    As

    Cal

    der?n

    points

    out

    in

    his

    auto,

    No

    hay

    m?s

    fortuna

    que

    Dios,

    it is

    natural

    for

    man,

    even

    though

    a

    Christian,

    to

    seek

    to

    live life

    in

    a

    purely

    human

    world

    where,

    aside

    from

    weekly

    attendance

    at

    mass,

    God

    does

    not

    count

    for

    much.

    Hence,

    it

    may

    have

    been

    to

    show

    secularized

    members

    of

    his

    audience the

    relationship

    between

    the

    secular and

    the divine

    and the

    inferiority

    f the

    former

    to

    the latter

    that

    Lope

    brought

    together

    the

    tyrant-play

    and

    the

    martyr-play,

    setting

    forth that

    relationship

    is

    such

    detail.

    Equal

    in

    significance

    to

    the author's intention

    is

    what Lo

    fingido

    ver

    dadero

    and

    the other

    martyr

    plays

    reveal

    about

    the

    age

    in

    which

    they

    were

    written.

    Plays

    about another

    age

    usually

    make

    a

    comment

    about

    their

    own

    age,

    as

    well

    as

    about

    the

    age

    they

    represent.

    In

    the

    case

    of

    Fingido

    and

    other

    martyr-plays

    this

    comment

    is

    made

    by

    the

    assumptions

    that

    underly

    the

    plays,

    and

    it

    akes the form of

    what

    can

    be

    termed

    the

    Christianity

    of

    the

    graveyard,

    a

    bleak

    Counterreformation

    pessimism.

    It is

    impossible

    to

    be

    a

    good

    Christian and live

    in

    the

    world;

    society's

    values

    and

    Christian

    values

    are

    totally

    irreconcilable,

    and

    hence

    death

    is

    the

    quickest

    way

    to

    God and the ultimate aspiration of love. Nor is sexual love permitted:

    following

    in

    the

    age-old

    and

    widespread

    Catholic

    tradition

    of distrust

    of

    sex,

    it

    is

    assumed

    that

    a

    good

    convert

    will

    automatically

    choose

    celibacy

    This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Sun, 9 Nov 2014 19:07:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/10/2019 Amor en Lope

    17/17

    148

    and reject the propagation of the species. It is a bleak picture which

    emerges

    from

    Lope's

    assumptions,

    but then he lived

    in

    bleak

    age,

    thatof

    the Counterreformation

    which still

    has

    much

    to

    answer

    for.

    The

    University

    of British

    Columbia

    NOTES

    1

    Hac?a

    Calder?n,

    Quinto

    Coloquio Anglogermano,

    Oxford, 1978,Wiesbaden,

    1982,

    42^7.

    2

    A

    Theory

    of

    Semiotics

    (London,

    1977),

    183-84.

    3 See

    for instance El tirano

    rey

    Corbanto,

    La

    rep?blica

    al

    rev?s

    and

    La

    gran

    Cenobia.

    4

    The edition used for

    Fingido

    is

    found

    in

    Lope

    de

    Vega

    Carpio,

    Obras

    escogidas,

    m,

    ed.

    F.

    C.

    Sainz

    de Robles

    (Madrid,

    1974).

    5

    The

    idea that Diocletian

    is

    n

    actor

    was

    first

    pointed

    to

    by

    D.

    Moir in E.M.

    Wilson

    and

    D.

    Moir,

    A

    Literary

    History

    of

    Spain:

    The Golden

    Age

    Drama

    (London, 1971),

    58.

    6

    "Rotrou

    and

    Lope

    de

    Vega:

    Two

    Approaches

    to

    Saint-Genest,"

    Canadian

    Review

    of

    Comparative

    Literature,

    6

    (1979),

    350.

    7

    The

    edition

    used

    is

    found

    in

    bras de

    Lope

    de

    Vega,

    ix,

    d.

    M.

    Men?ndez

    Pelayo

    (Mad

    rid,

    1964).

    8

    The New

    English

    Bible,

    (Oxford,

    1972),

    885-86.