Zp ]h^bg...dojog ajg e [oeeklb kjp a (CHD) dDdR g a i o mijH\HgpbMHlDdR b eeqe a. Bi ad, CHD b ^a e...
Transcript of Zp ]h^bg...dojog ajg e [oeeklb kjp a (CHD) dDdR g a i o mijH\HgpbMHlDdR b eeqe a. Bi ad, CHD b ^a e...
E
ћ
ј
: . ћ
ј , 2014.
1
I O 5
1 τ τ A A EM J A τ E T 6
2 7
3 A Tτ A A A TA A τ τ A E EM J E τ E T 9
4 A τ τ τ JA τ τ A E E JE E
τ E 10
5 E E JA E E E τ τ A E EM J E τ E T 11
6 E J τ 14
7 τ τ A E EM J E τ E TI 19
8
23
9
28
9.1 Ђ PCI
(CABG) 29
9.2
35
9.3 Ђ
40
2
II 43
III 44
1 44
2 44
3 44
4 44
IV Ј 45
1 45
2 45
3 46
4 47
4.1 47
4.2 47
4.3 47
V 49
VI 50
1 50
1.1 50
1.2 51
1.3 A τ A A A JE A A 52
3
1.4 A A JE A A τ τ A A τ E A 53
1.5
CABG 55
1.6 CABG 56
1.7 CABG 57
1.8
CABG 58
1.9
CABG 59
1.10
EUROSCORE PCI 60
1.11
PCI 62
1.12
PCI 63
1.13 A A JE A A τ τ A A τ E A A
A τJ τ τ A E τ E A JE A A A E τ ЈCI
64
1.14
PCI 65
1.15
EUROSCOR-U 66
1.16
67
1.17 69
2 , ЈCI 72
4
2.1
PCI 72
2.2
PCI 73
2.3
PCI 74
3 76
3.1
PCI 76
3.2
PCI 77
3.3
78
4
80
4.1 81
4.2
(ЋЏEЋ) 82
4.3
(VES) 84
4.4
86
4.5 87
4.6
PCI 89
4.7 PCI 90
5
4.8
91
5 92
5.1
92
5.2
94
5.3 95
VII JA 97
1 ЈCI
CABG 102
VIII 106
IX Ј
107
X 109
6
I O
Ш К Ш К К К О О О Ш Ш К О
К О У О Ш О , ШУ К У К О Ш О О К К К УО
Ш К К CABG, К Ш Ш Ш К УО К К К О Ш Ш Ш Ш К Ш
Ш О , Ш К Ш О Ш О УК Ш К К О К ШУ Ш Ш К ШУ
О О У ЈCI К О Ш . К О Ш Ш К ШУО К Ш К
Ш Ш Ш Ш К, К УО К PCI О Ш О КШ
К О, Ш О О PCI К О Ш Ш К УО К К К О Ш Ш Ш Ш К Ш
Ш О О О К О О. Ш ШУ К Ш К ШУ “ О -О ”, К УО К
Ш Ш К Ш К О У Ш Ш О К УШ К CABG,
О О О У К PCI КШ УК К К О К К О Ш
О К К. О О УО Ш К К О Ш О О Ш К К Ш Ш 20% Ш 40%
Ш О PCI К О Ш , К Ш О Ш К О О О Ш Ш К К
Ш К.
О О О О О К je
О Ш К PCI К О Ш К Ш К К О К КУО К Ш
О О К К К УО Ш К К Ш О О К. К КУК К К Ш
Ш О О Ш О УК К Ш К К К Ш К Ш Ш Ш К К О УК К
УО Ш О К К К О К Ш Ш Ш К Ш О О УШ К О Ш К Ш Ш Ш
Ш К О Ш -О О ( ).
7
, К КУ К О К К Ш Ш К К О У
Ш О О К К К УО Ш О О К УШ О УО Ш К К Ш К К
УО УШ О Ш Ш О К. ШУ Ш О К О К О К О
.
τ Ш К К К Ш О О К УО УО К Ш О КУ О Ш Ш PCI К
О Ш К Ш О О К К К УО К К К О Ш PCI
К О Ш О К К Ш ОђО Ш- К Ш .
1 O O A A EM J A O E T
o o a a e j a o e o a a a e j o a a e
ea e a o a e o o o a o o o a e a e je
o a oj o e a oj o e o a a a eo o .
o e e e e e je o je a aja a e a o o
o o a e o e a (CHD) К Ш a o О О УО К Ш e e a. a ,
CHD a e a a o e o a o a e a e e К ШУ
О . CHD e a e je o e a : o a e
a e, a o a a o a a (AMI), a e e je (HF),
a ja e a e a e ( ).
o a ja, e e o a o eђ j
a je a a. a e e a o o eђ j aj
a o e e a.
8
a je a a a o a o , o o o o a
a a o o . o К УО К К К О Ш К Ш e a a a ja
o a a o aje a a e a j a o ja. a je, a e o a a CHD
e a a e o a o o a je a a a a o a o a e a e
e a a a j o a a. o a o a e a a a ja o a a
a a a aj o e o e e a o e a.
2
, ,
.
(WHO) 2008. ,
17,3 ,
30% .
,
,
80% .
2030.
, ,
23 1.
9
.
4 , 47%
. ђ
1,9
2.
.
- ,
,
3.
.
„
“, 2012.
. 54972, 53,7%
.
26,2%,
19,2%, 7,4%,
47,1%4. ,
.
10
3 A TO A A A TA A O O A E
EM J E O E T
oja " a o К" О О Ш Ш К Ш О o e a a e e
oje aђe e o a oje a a, a a oje je ђe o e e o o
ja a a o e a a a a o oja o o e , o o aj
Ш Ш К О О У О Ш О . e e , oja a o a a
o a a o e e e o e e a a e e a o oje К5.
Je К Ш Ш Ш О К О О К О О К К УО ( ) je
К О О Ш К О У О О О УО К Ш К К Ш Ш О К, КШ
О К К Ш Ш К К Ш К ШУ Ш Ш О Ш О. τ Ш К К О УК УО
О К К КШ Ш К К Ш О К К О Ш О Ш О К К О К К О
К О К У Ш Ш К О О У О Ш О .
Ш К Ш УО К Ш ОђО О Ш О , К К К О, Ш Ш Ш К Ш К
К К ШУ Ш Ш К О О У О Ш О К КУ К О Ш О Ш Ш О К КУ
О О К Ш . К Ш К О О К К КУ К О О, К К
О Ш КУ О К Ш О К Ш О6. К О К О К Ш К
К Ш КУ К ШУК Ш Ш К О О У О Ш О О К К О К К
О Ш Ш , Ш Ш Ш К7.
О Ш К К О К Ш К К Ш Ш Ш К Ш ШУ УШ О УО
К К Ш О , КШ О К К О К ШУК Ш О Ш О Ш К К ШУО
О К КУ К О К К К , О К КУ К О О О К О
О О УО О О К О О Ш К К УО.
11
ОШ К УО К Ш К О Ш К Ш К Ш К ШУО К Ш Ш К К К
Ш О Ш Ш Ш Ш ШУ О ШУ К Ш К. О К Ш О К
О К К Ш Ш К КУ К О ШУК О К Ш Ш Ш Ш К О К УО
Ш О 8.
4 A O O O JA
O O A E E JE E O E
. ,
,
9,10.
.
,
11. a e o ja o e a e a a a e e
Ш Ш К К Ш К ШК a je, e o e o
o a e o e a o o a o , o o o o a e a je o o a
a o e e a o o a e o o e, o o a o a o a a a e
Ш Ш О ШО Ш К УО .
12
5 E E JA E E E O O A E
EM J E O E T
,
.
,
.
, .
o o o ШУО E Ш ШУ j o j
a o a a e o e o e 192 ja e e a. O o a o o 57% О
Ш Ш О О К, 21% o o 22% e o a a e a
o o e 8. aj e eo o o a a o o a a e j a o e
e e o a a a o e . a e, e j a o e a e a a e a o
e e o a e o o o ja o e .
ja o e e o o a e e j e o e e j e
o a a e o e o o a a e o o a e e a. e a o e
o e o e e aj o e je e a e a e e o e ja o e,
a e e e a a o e a j e o e, ao e e a a o o ja
a o ja.
Me a e o e a je aj a e e o. О О Ш УО
О О e a o oj o a j a o a a a a a a o o a e
13
e j e o e , К К К О УО О Ш К o o a e a e
o o o a e a Ш К. К К Ш О К j О К О О УО a
e e j Ш О УО Ш О oja e e e e o aђaja aj o
o e e a o a a a e a e . aj a j О О К Ш Ш К
О О К УО o ja e e e a o e e e e a e o e e o e a je,
a e o e e ej a e a e o e e a je a o o je
o je e a e o a oђa a e o a .
„ e a a a ja o a К” oja e o o a o o o o a a e
o e o e o o a a o a je e o o o o e e o e:
Ш Ш К О К О УО К Ш (CABG)
О К К Ш Ш К К О О УК (ЈCI)
T Ш Ш К О К УК ( О К Ш К УО К К К К
К Ш Ш К К К К К О О К О Ш Ш К О
О О УО Ш О).
Ш Ш К О К О УО К Ш (CABG) УО К e o a
e a a a je ojoj e o ( О О / К О УО)
e o a e a e aђ j o a o ( ) a o
a Ш О o o a a e j , a o e o a a
o o a o e o e o o a a. CABG a e a o o e
o a o o j o a a e o oj a e e j . o e e e e e je
a je e o o a a o o a CABG e e e e a a j
e PCI. Meђ , CABG o aje o e a o e a o o a oj
14
e a a a j a je a a a o o e o o a
o o e e oje a je e o o a PCI.
a e o e ja o o a o a e o e o o a a o eђ je
a e j e oje e e a a a je o a a.
A e o e o a oj o a К > 70% e a a a e a aj o
e o o aj e e o a a o a o o o a e a e o o a
e a a a je. O a e e je o a o e PCI CABG.
a aj e e je e o e e a ja e o o a e a e je О УО ШУО
О Ш Ш О К Ш О О К К Ш К Ш О О К К К CABG.
О УО ШУО Ш К Ш К О КУ О К О К Ш Ш К К О УК К
Ш Ш Ш К К Ш УШ Ш К КУ О К ЈCI.
e a a o o a a e e ja (PCI) je e e o a
oje e o o e a e a o o a a a e ja o a a e a o o o a e e a
a o a. e aje a a Ш Ш К О О Ш К О Ш
a o a o a o a, o o a a o o o e a. PCI je o ao
o a a o a a o o a e a a a j o a je a a a
a o e a o Ш Ш К Ш Ш О .
o a e e a a a Ш Ш К Ш К К О Ш Ш
o О К УШ Ш Ш К О К О УО o a a e a PCI a e a e ja
o o a . O a o e a a a e a a . A e a o o o
a a PCI je o a e a a e a a o o oj o o a e
o o e.
15
O o o a o o a e a o a e A ea a ü a (1977),
o a je a aj o o o a . Te a e a aje o a o e o
o o a e o a o o e e a je e a e a e o a
e Ш o o e a a o o a Ш Ш Ш О О Ш О. К К О
Ш ЈCI e o o a aj a je e je o e o , ao
o e je О Ш О e je.
6 E J O
a e a o e o o a a e je e j o e e e .
T a e j a e a a a e o e a o o a o a a
o a a, a o o e a e o o a e e e je o o e a je
a. o e j e e e oj o o a a a o aja a
e je, o a a a a e o e jo a
o a e a o a e a a o a a .
a e j o o , o e je, a e e eo a e je
a e o o a o o o a jo o e o a e o a
a e o - o a a (AT ).
e o a a AT -a e a jo e a a e e j e e a e o o o
o a a je a j a (Na+) o e, a j a ( +) e ja a,
o e e ja.
A a ja a ae o o e a a o e a je a a
e e a a e e je o e a o a a e je a e j o
16
a o o o a a je a a a. To o o o a a je a e a a
a j - o o a (Na+H+) o e je o a o e j o a a jo
Na+. o a o, a a ja a e e a o a o o o o
o o e o o e e a e e j e e a e je12.
a e a a j - a j a (Na+/Ca2+) je a o aj a j e j
e a a a a a a e Ca2+ oj a a je a jo a j a o jo a
Na+. ao o o o a o o a e j o Na+, e je e o o
e a e o o eo a a a j a a e je o e a e
a e a e a a je Ca2+. o a e Ca2+ e j e a oђe o ja
e e Na2+ a a a o o o aђa e Ca2+ e j o
a o a a o e a o e j e o e e13. e a a a
e e o a e e o o e e e o e e e a o
a a jo Ca2+, a a je a oђe a a e a a oj e o e e a
o o e a e14. o o o j e a e Ca2+ e a oђe
o e a aj o o e Ca2+ o o j oj e a e je ao a a
o oj e a- o o j a e j Ca2+ a o o j
a . To o o o eo e e e a Ca2+ a o e e e
o e ja e a e e a e o a o e e o o ja15.
a a e o a e j a a aje o a e e j o a e a
o e e a e e j o a aja e a e j a o
e a e e j e e a e.
oj a a o e j o o e e e oje o o o e o e
e ja o a a ( a a) o e a e o o o e e e o a a
o a a o a a o a a. o e e o o a
17
e e ja a a je a e - o e a a o-e o ja, e a
a e o e o o a a, jo je a o aje a e o e o o
e o e e j e . Meђ , e aje a e j o a e
o a a o e o o o , e a e o a o
e a a a jo . O a К „ e e УК”, a o, e a a a e
e j o o e e e e ja, a a o e a a e j o aђaja a
e je oja o a o e e o a a, „ e e o o o e e e”.
o e e o e e j e , o oje jo a a a a oja o e
a a e j a e e j o o e e a: a o o a a o a ja.
( . απόπ ω ις )
. A o o a o e a e a a o o aђa e o o a
o e e e o o je o e a e e e o a oj a je
a o o a a e je. e j a oja a aje o a
e a o o aђa e, a o , a a, o e a je, a a je
o a a e a a e e a e16. e ja a oђe o e a a o e
e a o a a e je o a o a j , a e j e o e
oje e ja a o e a aj. a e o e a a o a e e j e
je jo je o a e o, a o o o a e a a a j
o eo o o o a o e a, ao o o o a a a j a a a
o o a e j .
a o e a a a je a a e j e je , a
e ja a a aj o e a a e eђ a, a o a a e e je o a
o a j a a e e e o je o e a a o e e o16.
18
e e ja e j o a o a o o e e j a e
e j o o e e a e ja oje o e a o oj e j o a a.
Meђ , e a oj e e j e je o a a oje e e e
a e oe e j o o e e a o e e j o aђaja a e je
oj o a o e o a e o e e a. O aj e o e o e e e ja
o a a o o a a o o o a a e e je e j o
o a o a je КШ „ e a o e e o o o e e О”. τ o o a a o
a a e o a o a a o . e e ja o a a o e a
o e e o a e a ja o e e a o e e o o
o e e a, o a o e a a a e e o e a je.
a o o o o o o e e o o o e e a, a a e ja e
e a o o je e e o o e e e. o o a e o e a a
a e j e o e e a o e ja eo o a e o a e a o
e e o o o e e e, a e a o e o o a o e j e 17.
a a o , aj e e o e e je e je e o e o e
a e a je e e o o e e a o eђe o e o a a e
o e e e je. Ta oђe je e o e o e a o a a a a a e j e
e e o o o e e a o a a a je o e j e o
e j o o e a je e e o 17. Je e a a
o o e a a o a a je e a e a o a ja o a
e e je o e a e e j o oje o o o o. a a
je o o o a o a o a ja o a e e je a a a o
a e.
19
e j e a e e e o a o e e a o o
a ja e o o a o a oj a a a oja e a o a e a
Ye o a e oy 18 e . 17. Me a e e o o o e e a
o a e aj : a) a o a e j o eo e e e e a j o oje o o
o e o a e o a, ) o a e , ) a e a a j
o o e PH e o a o o ea ) a a je a a o
a a a, o oj o o e e o o a a o a e e jo
a o o o .
a o o e o o o e e e je. a e
a o e o e a a, e je o o a aj e o o ja.
T a o a o a o ao o o ja (mPTP) a e e
a e o oje o e e ja j e e o o e e a. a a
e a a o o ja oja je o o o a a o a a e o e ja a
o o j e a e a e je o a o a e o a a jo e
e o e e. a a e e e o o e ja a o e a a a o je
„ a ja o o ”, o je o e oj e a a o e o a o
mPTP. a o a a o o e a a o e a o aje e o a , o a e o a
a a e e e a a a eђ a e a a o o ja
a o a e. e a je a e e o e j o a je a, o o aђa e
ea a eo a (ROS) o a e a o o o a. eo e e e e
a j o , a a o a a ja Ph e o o a o e
o a o a mPTP. e e o o o mPTP o o o
a aja a o a e o o a je o e o AT a e a, o a a
o o ja a e e a e je15,19. oa o o a a je
20
o o aђa e o o a a e e a e o o ja a oђe
o o e j oj . a e a o o o e e o o o e e ,
ja mPTP e a a ao a e a a e e o o
o e e a. oj a e o o je e a o e e o o
o e e e e e j o o e e a.
o e o, e a aje a e e o o o e e a o a a
a a a e e e e e j o o e e a. e o a aje a
e j o- e e o o e e a a oj a e e e o e e a
o a e aj a T e e a j o
a oj e a oj e e j o o ,
a o e e ja a oje o a e aj a o e a oj.
o a a, aj e o e a a a o M je a
e o a ja a e a a . To je o e o o a oja a e j
e e a
a e j o o e e a. a o o o e ,
a a a je a e a e e a a o e o
a eђ a e e a a o e a o e j o o e e e
a. Marry at al.20 .
21
7 O O A E EM J E
O E TI
. .
21-25.
, 26.
- ,
.
ђ 1958. 27,
26
,
.
.
, ђ , -
20. .
28-30.
22
. 25. 1964
,
.
31.
25. 1964. 9. 1967.
, . ,
32,33.
1967. ,
.
.
, ,
: - 34. 18
155
,
,
.
(Garett) (Sabiston)
35,36
1962. 1964. ,
( 1973. ),
.
23
, .
ђ , ђ
, ,
37-42.
-
, 1972. 1984.
,
43.
,
ђ
. ђ
44-48.
, ,
,
, “ ” 21-27 .
, ,
.
24
, ,
. , ,
,
27-30,49.
,
35,36,50.
ђ
51.
,
.
.
.
8
A ea o a (A.Gruntzig)
52. ,
1977. ,
.
25
, , ,
. ,
.
23% .
53 % .
1.9 2.7 53 .
ђ
ђ .
1986. 1992. .
ђ 54-58. ,
ђ
. ђ ,
, ,
30 % 60 %
,
. ђ
2% 13 % 59.
, ђ
, .
60.
.
.
,
26
,
61-63.
2002. DES ( drug eluting stent ),
.
( ) 64,65.
ђ . ,
,
.
.
,
66-68.
ђ
, ,
69.
ђ
( )
.
,
.
ђ ,
.
ђ ђ ,
( follow up ) 30-35,103,104.
27
,
,
70-73.
ђ
,
.
ђ
. ,
e
.
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО” . ђ
.
e
“TШrКбМОЧtОr”. ,
“AЦОrТМКЧ HОКrt AssШМТКtТШЧ”,
, American College of Cardiology (ACC)/AHA
, ,
.
“ЋвЧtКб”
2005. 74.
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО”
>50%
>1.5 .
28
16
( 1).
1.
1 2
3.5
, 5 , 0.5
. 1.5
.
, ђ ,
50%-99% .
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО”
,
.
29
12
.
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО” ( 0 – 22),
.
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО” ( ђ 23 – 32 )
, .
“ЋвЧtКб sМШrО” ( 33)
.
9
.
,
:
(PCI)
(CABG).
(PCI)
(CABG).
(CABG)
.
30
9.1 Ђ PCI (CABG)
ђ PCI
CABG .
. BARI 1829 CABRI 1054.
EAST 392 , GABI 359 ,
Toulouse study 152 , MASS 142, Lausanne 134, ERACI
127 . RITA , 1011
.
ђ
, .
ђ .
BARI (The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation)
. ђ
(PTCA) -914
(915 ).
CABG 1.3%
PTCA 1.1%. Q- ,
CABG 4.6% 2.1%.
0.8% CABG PTCA 0.2%.
31
CABG 89.3%
PTCA 86.3%
BARI ђ
.
CABG 8%
PTCA 54%. , 19 %
PTCA,
CABG
3 %. PTCA 31%
75.
CABRI–(Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation
Investigation)
. ,
. ђ
.
1054 , 820 234 .
26 .
60. , 513 CABG
541 PTCA.
, CABG
2.7% PTCA 3.9%.
32
PTCA
. 66.4% PTCA
ђ CABG
93.5%76.
PTCA
.
, .
RITA – (The Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina)
(PTCA)
(CABG).
ђ .
ђ
.
1011 .
. 45%
55 % .
, 6,5 , PTCA 17%
CABG 16%. , 39 PTCA
33
CABG 45. ,
.
PTCA 26%
CABG 19.
PTCA 4% CABG 2% 77.
EAST – (The Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial)
ђ
(PTCA)
(CABG). 392 198
PTCA 194 CABG.
.
.
,
PTCA.
ЈTCA 79.3% ,
CABG 82.7%.
,
,
78.
GABI – (Germany Angioplasty vs Bypass Investigation)
ђ PTCA CABG
. 8981 307 . CABG
152 PTCA 155.
34
,
. CABG 2,2
PTCA 1,9.
, 35 CABG PTCA 41.
PTCA CABG79.
Toulouse , ђ
PTCA CABG .
2,8 152 . 76 .
67 . 3 4
52.5%, 10 % 29 %.
. CABG 7 PTCA 5 .
PTCA
9.2% CABG 1.32%
MASS – (The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study)
, ђ
,
.
214 , ,
35
. CABG 70 , PTCA 72
72 .
CABG
3%, PTCA
24%, 12%.
80.
ERACI - (Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transluminal
Coronary Angioplasty Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel
Disease)
PTCA CABG
. 127
, PTCA
63 CABG o 64 . 1, 3 5
.
ђ ( Q – ,
, )
PTCA 77% 47%.
.
7.8%. 79% PTCA CABG
57%. .
PTCA 37%
CABG 6.3%
81.
36
Lausanne ,
1994,
, PTCA CABG.
134 , PTCA 68, CABG
66. 80%
56 . PTCA
11.8% 1.5%.
PTCA 8.8% CABG
3%. .
9.2
-
ђ
( , , )
PTCA. ,
.
.
37
ђ
. ARTS, SOS,ERACI-2,MASS-2, AWESOME .
ђ 1985. 2000. 3051
113 . 1518
1533 .
RTS – (The Final Analysis of the Arterial Revascularization
Therapies Study) ( )
.
1206 , PCI
600 CABG 606 .
( , ,
)82.
8% 7.6%
PCI .
18.2% CABG 14.9%.
30.3% CABG 8.8%.
.
.
38
(MACE)
.
SOS – (The Stent or Surgery trial)
53 ђ
.
988 500 CABG 488 PCI
.
21%
6%.
9%
10% CABG83.
,
.
ERACI II – (Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous
Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in
Multivessel Disease II)
ђ
.
450 . 225
( ) .
.
39
30 , 1,3 5 . MACE
( )
, , .
30 CABG
3.6% 12.3%. ,
CABG 7.6 % 2.6%.
34.7%
CABG 23.6%. ,
CABG 11.6% 7.1%.
ERACI II
.
MASS II – (The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study)
, .
, ,
.
,
,
.
40
611 .
. CABG 203 ,
205 203 .
CABG 74.9%.
75.1%
69%.
:
CABG 10.3%, 13.3%
20.7% 84.
CABG 7.4 %, 41.9%
39.4%.
. ђ
.
WESOME – ( Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality
Evaluation )
(
). .
41
1995. 2000. 16
ђ 2431
. O 454
142 CABG.
1650, 719 CABG.
327 119 CABG.
Kaplan-Meier
85.
CABG 73% PCI
76% .
.
9.3 Ђ
(drug-eluting stent DES)
.
. The SYNTAX trial ( Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus
42
Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery disease),
86 87. CARDIA Trial (Coronary
Artery Revascularization in Diabetes)88, The ARTS II (Arterial
Revascularization Therapies Study)89 ERACI III trial (Argentine Randomized
Trial of Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting Versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in
Patients with Multiple Vessel Disease)90.
SYNTAX CARDI ,
ARTS II ERACI III
.
3895 .
DES 1914 1981 .
.
DES, 42% , CABG
44%. (SYNTAX,ERACI III ARTS
II), DES- 63-65
CABG 61-65 . DES 70%
68%.
34%.
. DES-
4.9% CABG 5.0%. 5.2%
4.4%.
1.9% DES CABG 2.7%.
ђ MACCE,
21.1% 16.3%.
43
,
ђ DES ђ
,
.
MACCE- .
44
II
1.
.
2.
.
3.
.
4.
.
45
III
1
.
2
.
3
.
4
.
46
IV
1
–
.
–
.
–
.
2
. :
, ( 19 ),
ђ
, 1.
2011. 31. 2012. .
47
: (18 ђ ), ђ
,
ђ DES,
.
.
3
ђ 1.
2011. 31. 2012.
.
ђ PCI
,
. 94 .
ђ
PCI (812 ).
48
4
4.1
: , ,
, .
4.2
, ,
, , ( ≥
176µmol/L), , , (BMI 30),
, ,
(EF), (MI), NYHA ,
, , ,
( ,
, ), (β-
, , , , )
.
4.3
,
, ( )
.
, ,
49
, SVES,
VES, ( ), ,
, ,
.
.
50
V
:
, , , ,
. ђ
- - .
- . ђ
.
,
ROC .
51
VI
1
1.1
906
01.01.2011.
31.12.2012. . ђ
, , ђ
, 94 .
ђ 814
( 1).
52
1.
1.2
.
649 72 %,
257 28% ( 2) .
53
2.
1.3 A O A A A JE A A
62.1 ˃ 8.5
32 82 . 65 585 65%,
321 65 ( 3 ).
54
3. У 65
1.4 A A JE A A O O A A O E A
. :
, , ,
. 374 , 825
, 617 , 390
55
356 BMI
30 ( 4).
a o 4. С a a jО a a o o a a o О a a
a a a o o a О О j О o О
56
1.5
CABG
EuroScore-
uroScore. EuroScore-
PCI 2.57 . 0,
EuroScore-a 14.
.
(0-2) 51.73%.
oj a e oo o e a o o e a o a (3-5)
44.16% .
(>5) 8.30%
( 5).
EuroScore-a PCI
2.94. 0.49, 31.2.
,
(0–2) 43.69 % .
(3–5) 52.20%.
, > 5 4.11% ( 5).
57
a o 5. С a a jО a a o o a o o О a o
o О a o a PCI
1.6 CABG
,
582, 71.7%, 230
28.3 % ( 6 ).
58
a o 6. o a a a jО a PCI
1.7 CABG
PCI
62.1 ˃ 8.36 . ђ 32,
82 . 65 527 64.9% ,
65 285 35.1% ( 7).
59
a o 7. С a o a a a jО a a CABG
1.8
CABG
. , ,
349 . 750 .
562 . 346
60
, 325 BMI 30
( 8).
a o 8. С a a jО a a o o a a o О О
CABG
1.9
CABG
PCI, 812 ђ
. , 609 β –
. 398 .
61
589 . ACE 602,
421 . ( 9).
9. С PCI
1.10
EUROSCORE
PCI
. EuroScore- PCI
2.42. 0, EuroScore-a
9.
.
62
(0-2) 57.12% . oj a e
oo o e a o o e a o a (3-5) 36.3 %
.
(>5) 6.58% ( 10).
EuroScore-a PCI
1.84. 0.5, 16.87.
,
(0–2) 61.35 % .
, (3–5) 35.50% .
, > 5
3.15% ( 10).
a o 10. С a a jО a a o o a o О a
o О a PCI
63
1.11
PCI
PCI,
. 67
71%, 29% 27
( 11)
11.
PCI
64
1.12
PCI
PCI, ,
61.92 ˃ 9.63 . ђ 35,
79 . 65 62% 58 , 65
36 38% ( 12).
a o 12. С a o a a a jО a a a О o
PCI
65
1.13 A A JE A A O O A A O E A
A A OJ O O A E O E A JE A A A
E O ЈCI
PCI PCI
. , 25
75 .
44 . 55 .
, BMI 30, 31
( 13).
a o 13. С a a jО a a o o a a o О a
a О o o PCI
66
1.14
PCI
94 PCI,
, 82 87.2% .
. 81.9% 77
. , ACE
77.7% 73 . β-
69 46 ( 14).
14. С PCI
67
1.15
EUROSCOR-U
ђ
ђ EuroScore-
. EuroScore
,
.
ђ .
PCI, О К О Ш К Ш Ш je 2.42, Ш
УО О К О Ш Ш Ш Ш К 1.84.
К УО О О Ш Ш ЈCI КУ О О Ш К Ш
Ш К 2.57, Ш УО О К О Ш Ш Ш Ш К О Ш К Ш О К Ш Ш
К Ш 2.94 ( 15).
a a e e o a o o a eђ Ш О О К УО К К
je a a aj К (p = 0,904).
a К e e o o o o a eђ
a a aj a (p = 0,198).
68
a o 15. У o О a a a a Оo О a o a o О О
a jО a a
1.16
,
.
.
PCI, 81.9% , 49 %
PCI .
(p < 0,0005).
69
PCI . 87.2%,
72.5%. a e o ЈCI
(p = 0,002) ( 16).
. β- .
PCI 73.4%, PCI 75%.
ACE , 77.7% PCI ACE
74.1%.
. PCI,
, 50.5 %
51.8% ( 16).
16. У
70
1.17
,
, , , ,
ђ .
PCI
43% PCI 26.6%.
(p=0.003).
PCI 92.4%
PCI 79.8%
(p 0.0005).
PCI, 69,2 58.5.
ђ
(p = 0,047) ( 17).
BMI > 30 .
PCI, 40 % 42.6%.
PCI 33% 46.8% ( 17).
71
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
43%
92.40%
69.20%
42.60% 40%
26.60%
79.80%
58.50%
46.80%
33%
ез PCI PCI
17. У
72
1. ј
Без PCI
(n = 812)
PCI
(n = 94) Р
n (%) n (%)
Пол ушк 582 (71,7 ) 67 (71,3) 1,000
Год е 62 (56 – 69) 63,50 (56 – 69) 0,774
EF % 53 (48 – 59) 53 (48 – 59) 0,987
А т г ег о те п ј
398 (49,0) 77 (81,9) < 0,0005
β- лок то 609 (75,0) 69 (73,4) 0,832
Ст т 589 (72,5 82 (87,2) 0,003
ACE то 602 (74,1) 73 (77,7) 0,537
Н т т 421 (51,8) 46 (50,5) 0,906
Пушење 346 (42,6) 44 (46,8) 0,504
Д ј ете 349 (43,0) 25 (26,6) 0,003
Х пе те ј 750 (92,4) 75 (79,8) < 0,0005
Х пе л поп оте е ј 562 (69,2) 55 (58,5) 0,047
BMI ˃ 30 325 (40,0) 31 (33,0) 0,225
Не т л г 101 (12,4) 10 (10,6) 0,736
73
2 ,
PCI
2.1
PCI
,
.
1 68 72.3%. ,
, 17 18%
PCI, ђ 2 .
ђ 3 . 4 ,
5 94 ( 17).
74
17. С
PCI
2.2
PCI
PCI
. , (BMS)
(DES), .
PCI, 71.27% BMS.
17.02% . PC 6.3%
5.33% ( 18 ).
75
18.
PCI
2.3
PCI
PCI ђ
.
ACD,
, RIA,
, RCX. ђ
,
D1. ђ
, .
76
RIA
RCX, ACD
RCX. RIM.
56.38%. ,
20.21% . 14.89%
, 2.12%
.
( RIM)
, , ( 19).
19.
PCI
77
3
3.1
PCI
906
.
, , ,
.
PCI 5,
1.
812 390 ђ
.
273 . 82
. 58 ,
5 ( 20).
78
20. С
PCI
3.2
PCI
PCI
4, 1.
.
, , ,
,
.
79
94 , , 48.
28 . 14 ђ
, 4 ђ 4 ( 21).
21. С
PCI
3.3
,
,
.
.
80
ђ
( ),
.
PCI
44 .
35 63.
PCI 55 .
45 70.
PCI
56 . 42
70.
66 .
52 81 .
a a e e o eђ
a je a a a PCI e a a aj a (p <
0,0005). e a e o a je a a o a e ЈCI УО 56 (42 – 70), ЈCI
44 (35–63). a a e e o E - eђ
a je a a a PCI e a a aj a (p < 0,0005). e a e o
a je a a o a e ЈCI УО 66 (52 – 81), PCI 55 (45 – 70) ( 22).
81
22. У
4
ђ .
,
.
.
82
.
.
4.1
o
.
- , ,
.
PCI 16%
. PCI
, 8.6% ( 23).
e o e a a e o PCI o e a (p =
0,034). a a o a e e ja o a je a e o e a a
a o e o o PCI (p = 0,023).
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a
e o e a a a a o o e o o PCI (p = 0,030) o
o e a o BMI (p = 0,033).
Odds ratio a e o PCI je 1,964 (1,067 – 3,616). e o PCI
o e a o e o e a o a a 96 %.
83
23.
.
4.2
(SVES)
. .
PCI 32% SVES.
21% ( 24).
PCI
(p = 0,020). M a ja a a a
o a e e ja o a je a SVES a a o o e o o PCI (p =
84
0,015). Odds ratio a e o PCI je 1,783 (1,117 – 2.864). a je
a e o PCI aj 78 % a SVES.
ђ
.
je a a aj o, a je a o a
(RIA) o o a (RCX) a 5
a e a SVES.
О К К УО К О К BMЋ УО О К К ШУК К SVES -a
Ш О К (p = 0.047). Ш О К SVES -К Ш К BMЋ К 36.1 % SVES –a,
К Ш Ш К К О К je 11.1 %.
a BMS o e a a o SVES -a o o 4.5 a.
2. ј
PCI (n = 812) PCI (n = 94)
n (%) n (%)
70 (8,6) 15 (16,0) 0,034
SVES 169 (20,8) 30 (31,9) 0,020
VES 196 (24,1) 36 (38,3) 0,004
10 (1,2) 0 (0,0) 0,611
ј 5 (0,6) 4 (4,3) 0,009
. . ј 6 (0,7) 1 (1,1) 0,537
18 (2,2) 1 (1,1) 0,711
85
24.
4.3
(VES)
ђ
. ,
PCI, 38.3% ЏEЋ. PCI,
24.1% ( 25).
e o PCI
o e a , (p = 0,004). ,
ђ ЏEЋ-
86
ЏEЋ o o e a (p = 0,032). e e e e o e aj
.
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a oja a
e a a o e o o PCI (p = 0,004), o a (p =
0,025), ja e e a (p = 0,027), a a a je aj e e je (p = 0,072).
Odds ratio a PCI je 1,966 (1,244 – 3.106). e o PCI o e a a
a 96.6 %. Odds ratio a o je 0,689 (0,497 – 0,953). M a aj a
31.1 % a o e a. Odds ratio a ja e e je 1,414 (1,041 – 1,923).
ja e e o e a a a 41.4 %.
25.
87
4.4
.
.
PCI, 4.3%
.
, 0.6% (
26).
У e o a О e o PCI
o e a (p = 0,009). M К УК К К К Ш К О О УК Ш К УО
К О УК Ш К О К Ш О Ш Ш ЈCI (p = 0.005).
τННs rКtТШ К О Ш ЈCI 6.702 (1.768 – 25.413). PCI
Ш О К К Ш О Ш К О Ш Ш 7 К.
88
26.
4.5
ђ
. , ђ ,
ђ
. PCI Ш 1.1% К УО К К УО Ш О О К
К Ш Ш К К ОК К УК, Ш УО ШУ КУ Ш О К Ш Ш
0.7% ( 27).
ђ ђ
, ђ .
89
a a e e o oja o a eђ ea a
e ea a je a a К К (p = 0,029). e a
e o oja o a ea a je 71 (65– 72), a
e ea a УО 62 (56 – 69).
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a
a o o a a ea a ja a a o o o a (p = 0,046). Odds ratio a
o О УО 1,113 (1,002 – 1,235). a a o a e o e a a o
ea a je a 11,3 %.
27.
90
4.6
PCI
94 PCI
(ЋЏEЋ) (ЏEЋ).
VES- , 38.3 31.9% ЋЏEЋ- .
,
16% .
4.3%. ( 28).
28.
PCI
91
4.7 PCI
PCI,
. 24.1% ЏEЋ-
. 20.8% .
9%
, 0.60%
1% ( 29).
29.
О PCI
92
4.8
30.
.
o .
.
, PCI
4.3% ,
0.6%. ђ 16%
PCI, 8.6%. ЏEЋ-
38.3% 24.1% PCI. PCI
31.9% ЋЏEЋ- , 20.8% .
PCI ,
PCI 1.2% ( 30).
93
30. У
5
5.1
PCI je 23 52 .
94
10 8 , 7 96 .
PCI
22 56 . 6
32 ,
11 56 . ( 31)
a a e e o e o a a
eђ a je a a a PCI e a a aj К (p = 0,046). e a
e o e o a a a je a a o a
PCI je 0.94 (0.93 – 1.44), a PCI 0.98 (0.88 – 1.84).
31.
95
5.2
PCI
10 . ,
7
54 . PCI 12 .
6 ,
40 (
32).
a a e e o e o a a o eђ
a je a a a PCI e a a aj К (p = 0,006). e a e o
e o a a o a je a a o a e PCI je 12 (9–17), a a PCI 10
(9–14).
0
5
10
15
20
д н 12 д н
vreme provedeno u ол
г уп PCI
г уп ез PCI
32.
96
5.3
19 2.09%
. PCI
1.1%. PCI 18
2.2% ( 33).
o e o PCI o e a (p = 0,711). a a
e e o oja o a eђ e e je a
a aj a (p = 0.017). e a e o oja o a je 71 (60 – 72), a
e e 62 (56 – 69). o
a a e a o e a (p = 0,021). a a o a
e e ja o a je a Ш О К Ш О Ш Ш ЈCI (p = 0,470).
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a o
a a o o oja o a a je a (p = 0,039) o a a a a e a
(p = 0,034). Odds ratio a o e je 1,064 (1,003 – 1,128). a a o a
e o e a a o o o a a 6,4 %. Odds ratio
3,328 (1,093 – 10,134).
97
33. У
98
VII JA
.
, ,
-
.
.
91,92. ,
,
93-95.
. ђ ,
.
1995., 96
PCI CABG. ђ 234
ђ PCI К К CABG , К
99
УО Ш 4,0 % , О Ш Ш ЈCI ШУ УО
2.8 % ( = 0,04 ). 1996, 97
172.184 ђ
CABG, PCI - .
PCI 2,
. Kalaycioglu
98 1998. 80
CABG,
ЈCI. , 99,
6504 CABG ( 919
PCI), PCI
CABG, 1.93 (p = 0.003) .
ђ , PCI -
CABG.
,
, PCI
100-102. ,
ђ PCI CABG. ,
10% 20 % 99,103,104 .
, PCI 94 (9,57%).
,
PCI,
CABG .
100
ЈCI
CABG,
ђ 105.
Bonaros 106 306
. ђ PCI CABG
CABG. PCI
(4.4% 2.4%, p<0.001).
906 ,
2011. 2012. ђ CABG
PCI (812 )
1,83 %. PCI CABG
(94 ) 1,06%.
PCI
CABG,o
ђ .
107. Yap 13,184
(1,457 PCI ) ђ CABG PCI
ђ PCI
(odds ratio 1,11; p=0.41). Thielmann 108
2626 ђ CABG PCI
ђ PCI ,
PCI-a.
101
,
.
.
,
, .
ђ PCI
(p = 0,034). a a o a e e ja o a je a e o e a a
a o e o o PCI (p = 0,023).
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a
e o e a a a a o o e o o PCI (p = 0,030) o
o e a o BMI (p = 0,033).
Odds ratio a e o PCI je 1,964 (1,067 – 3,616). e o PCI
o e a o e o e a o a a 96 %.
(p=0,041).
PCI
(p<0,0005).
102
PCI, 81,9% ,
49,0% .
.
.
.
,
.
.
PCI (p=0,009).
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a e ja o a e
a o e o o PCI (p = 0.005).
Odds ratio a e o PCI je 6.702 (1.768 – 25.413). e o PCI
o e a a o e o a e o o 7 a.
.
. ЋЏEЋ,
ЏEЋ.
SVES PCI (p=0,020). M a ja a a a
o a e e ja o a je a SVES a a o o e o o PCI (p =
0,015).
Odds ratio a e o PCI je 1,783 (1,117 – 2.864). a je a
e o PCI aj 78 % e a SVE.
103
,
PCI ђ (p=0,032).
VES .
M a ja a a a o a e e ja o a je a oja a
e a e a je a o e o o PCI (p = 0,004), o a (p = 0,025),
ja e e a (p = 0,027) a a a je aj e e je (p = 0,072).
Odds ratio a PCI je 1,966 (1,244 – 3.106). e o PCI o e a a
a 96.6 %.Odds ratio a o je 0,689 (0,497 – 0,953). M a aj a 31.1 %
a o e a. a ja e e je 1,414 (1,041 – 1,923). ja e e
o e a a a 41.4 %.
1
PCI CABG
PCI CABG:
1. ,
.
,
104
, drug-eluting ,
109.
2.
.
.
ђ 110.
PCI
.
3.
( )
ђ .
,
,
. , ,
,
.
4.
. ,
, .
,
.
.
105
5.
,
.
111.
6.
. PCI
CABG.
ђ CABG,
112.
7. ђ PCI
.
,
.
PCI
.
8.
.
,
.
.
106
, , ,
ђ .
CABG,
113-115. BMS
drug-eluting 115.
107
VIII
,
.
,
.
ђ PCI
.
,
.
PCI.
.
PCI
108
IX
.
.
EuroScore .
ђ
EuroScore . PCI
.
PCI
.
, PCI
,
,
.
PCI
, ,
PCI
.
109
,
PCI
( ) ,
, (
).
,
ђ .
110
X
1. World Health Organization; Cardiovascular diseases; Fact sheet N0 317,
Septembar, 2011.
2. Nichols M, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics, 2012.
3. Mickovski N, JКФШvХУОvТć B, LКpčОvТć M., Klasifikacija, epidemiologija, faktori
rizika i primarna prevencija ishemijske bolesti srca. Srce i krvni sudovi 2011;
30(3): 145-149
4. 2012, . ,, ”,
http://www.batut.org.rs
5. The Surf Report I.: Survellance of risk factors related to non communicans
diseases: Current status of global data. WHO, 2003.
6. Grundy SM, et al.: Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple risk
factor. Assessment equations. J Am Coll Cardiol l999; 34: 1348-59.
7. Conroy R. et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in
Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987-1003.
8. Allender S, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics, 2008
9. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V. Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation. Aug 1
1995;92(3):657-671.
10. Shah PK. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb
19 2003;41(4 Suppl S):15S-22S.
11. Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Crowe TD, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM.
Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary
syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. Feb 15
2000;101(6):598-603.
12. Hutter JF, Soboll S. Role of fatty acid metabolites in the development of
myocardial ischemic damage. Int J Biochem 1992;24(3):399-403.
13. 3. Murphy E, Cross HR, Steenbergen C. Is Na/Ca exchange during ischemia and
reperfusion beneficial or detrimental? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;976:421-430.
14. 4. Buja LM, Entman ML. Modes of myocardial cell injury and cell death in
ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1998;98(14):1355-1357.
15. 5. Halestrap AP. Calcium, mitochondria and reperfusion injury: a pore way to
die. Biochem Soc Trans 2006;34(Pt 2):232-237.
16. 6. Scarabelli TM, Knight R, Stephanou A, Townsend P, Chen-Scarabelli C,
Lawrence K, Gottlieb R, Latchman D, Narula J. Clinical implications of apoptosis
in ischemic myocardium. Curr Probl Cardiol 2006;31(3):181-264.
17. 7. Piper HM, Garcia-Dorado D, Ovize M. A fresh look at reperfusion injury.
Cardiovasc Res 1998;38(2):291-300.
111
18. 8. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med
2007;357(11):1121- 1135.
19. 9. Halestrap AP, Kerr PM, Javadov S, Woodfield KY. Elucidating the molecular
mechanism of the permeability transition pore and its role in reperfusion injury of
the heart. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998;1366(1-2):79-94.
20. 10. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay
of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986;74(5):1124-1136.
21. Beck CS. Development of new blood supply to heart by operation.Ann. Surg.
1935; 102:801-13.
22. 56. O'Shaugnessy L. Experimental method of providing collateral circulation to
the heart. J. Surg. 1936, 23:665-70.
23. 57. Mcallister FP, Leighninger D, Beck CS. Revascularization of the heart by
grafts of systemic artery into coronary sinus. JAMA. 1938; 137:436-2.
24. 58. Thompson SA. Development of cardio-pericardial adhesions Following the
use of talc. Proc. Soc Exp Biol. Med.1939; 40:260-1.
25. 59. Fauteux M, Palmer JH. Treatment of angina pectoris atheromatus of origin by
ligation of great cardiac veins. Can Med Assoc J 1941; 45:295-9.
26. Vineberg AM. Development of anastomosis between coronary vessels and
transplanted internal mammary artery. Can Med Assoc J. 1946; 55:117-9
27. Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK. Cine. coronary arteriography . Mod Concepts
Cardiovasc Dis. 1962, 31:375-8.
28. Bailey CP, May A, Lemmon WM. Survival after coronary endarterectomy in man.
JAMA 1957; 164:641-6.
29. Goetz RH, Robman M., Haller JD, Dee R, Rosenak SS. Internal mammary-
coronary artery anastomosis. The method nonsuture Employing tantalum rings. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1961; 41:378-86.
30. Senning, A. Strip grafting in coronary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;
41:542-9.
31. Kolesov VI, Potashov LV. Surgery of coronary arteries [in Russian]. Eksp Khir
Anesteziol 1965;10:3–8.
32. Olearchyk AS. Vasilii I. Kolesov. A pioneer of coronary revascularization by
internal mammary-coronary artery grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
1988;96:13–8. [PubMed]
33. KШЧstКЧtТЧШv IE. TСО ХКst аШrН ШЧ “К prШpОr ЧКЦО ПШr tСО ТЧtОrЧКХ ЦКЦЦКrв КrtОrв”? AЧЧ TСШrКМ ЋurР 1999;68:1440–1.
34. Favaloro RG. Saphenous vein autograft replacement of severe segmental coronary
artery occlusion: operative technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1968;5:334–9.
112
35. Sabiston DC. The coronary circulation. Hopkins Med J. 1974; 134:314-29.
36. Garrett HE, Dennis EW, De Bakey ME. Aortocoronary bypass with saphenous
vein graft. Seven-Year-Jollow Up. JAMA 1973; 223:792-4.
37. Frutkin AD, Lindsey JB, SK Mehta, JA House, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, Rumsfeld
JS, Marso SP; NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Drug-eluting
stents and the use of percutaneous coronary intervention among pacientes with
class I indications for coronary artery bypass surgery Undergoing index
revascularization: analysis from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data
Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2 (7) :614-21.
38. Dean LS. Class I indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what is the
Appropriate therapy for pacientes with multivessel coronary disease? JACC
Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2 (7) :622-3.
39. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Gold J, K Cozzens, Stamato NJ, Powell T, Hibberd M,
Walford G; American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association.
Adherence of catheterization laboratory cardiologists to American College of
Cardiology / American Heart Association Guidelines for percutaneous coronary
interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: what happens in actual
practice? Circulation. 2010, 121 (2) :267-75.
40. Yap CH, Yan BP, Akowuah E, Dinh DT, Smith JA, Shardey GC, Tatoulis J,
Skillington PD, Newcomb A, Mohajeri M, Pick A, Seevanayagam S, Reid CM.
Does prior percutaneous coronary intervention adversely Affect early and mid-
term survival after coronary artery surgery? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2 (8)
:758-64.
41. Tran HA, Barnett SD, Hunt SL, Chon A, Ad N. The effect of previous coronary
artery stenting on short-and intermediate-term outcome after surgical
revascularization in Patients with diabetes mellitus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2009, 138 (2) :316-23.
42. Hassan A, Buth KJ, RJ Baskett, IS Ali, Maitland A, Sullivan JA, Ghali WA,
Hirsch GM. The association between prior percutaneous coronary intervention and
short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J. 2005, 150
(5) :1026-31.
43. Thielmann M, Leyh R, Massoudy P, Neuhäuser M, Aleksic I, Kamler M, et al.
Prognostic significance of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions
in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation.
2006;114(1 Suppl):I441-7.
44. Massoudy P, Thielmann M, Lehmann N, Marr A, Kleikamp G, Maleszka A, et al.
Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary
artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
2009;137(4):840-5.
113
45. Toutouzas K, Colombo A, Stefanadis C. Inflammation and restenosis after
percutaneous coronary interventions. Eur Heart J. 2004, 25 (19) :1679-87.
46. Gomes WJ, E. Buffolo Coronary stenting and inflammation: implications for
Further surgical and medical treatment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006, 81 (5) :1918-25.
47. Gomes WJ, Giannotti-Filho O, Hossne NA Jr, Catani R, E. Buffolo Inflammatory
reaction after sirolimus-eluting stent implant. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005, 80
(5):1903-4.
48. Lüscher TF, Steffel J, Eberli FR, Joner M, Nakazawa G, Tanner FC, Virmani R.
Drug-eluting stent and coronary thrombosis: biological mechanisms and clinical
implications. Circulation. 2007, 115 (8) :1051-8.
49. Dallan LA, Gowdak LH, Lisboa LA, Milanez AM, Platania F, Moreira LF, Stolf
NA. Modification of an old procedure (Vineberg) in the stem cell was: a new
strategy? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009, 93 (5): E79-81.
50. Kolessov VI Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis the method of
treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976, 54:535-44.
51. JR Morris GC, Howell JF, Crawford S, Reul GJ, Chapman DW, Beazley HL,
Winters WL, Petersom PK. The distal coronary bypass. Ann Surg. 1970, 172:652-
62.
52. Gruntzig A. Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis. (Letters) Lancet.
1978; 4:263.
53. Detre, K. , Holubkov, R. , Kelsey, S. , And tHE Co-Investigators of the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Intitute's percutaneous Transluiminal Coronary
Angioplasty Registry. Percutaneous coronary transluiminal angioplasty in 1985-
1986 and 1977-1981. N. Engl. J. Med 1988; 318:265-70.
54. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized
Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Coronary angioplasty versus
coronary artery bypass surgery. Lancet. 1993, 341 (8845) :573-80.
55. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST) King SB 3rd, Lembo NJ,
Weintraub WS, Kosinski AS, Barnhart HX, Kutner MH, Alazraki NP, Guyton
RA, Zhao XQ. A randomized trial Comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary
bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 1994, 331 (16) :1044-50.
56. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI). Hamm CW, Reimers
J, Ischinger T, Rupprecht HJ, Berger J, Bleifeld W. The randomized Compared
study of coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery in pacientes with symptomatic
multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 1994, 331 (16) :1037-43.
114
57. Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation. CABRI
Trial Participants. First year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus
Bypass Revascularization Investigation). Lancet. 1995, 346 (8984) :1179-84.
58. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in pacientes with
multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996, 335 (4) :217-25.
59. King III, SB. The development of interventional cardiology.J. Am Col.
Cardiol.1998, 31:64 B-88B.
60. U Sigwart, J Purl, Mirkovitch V, Joffre F, L. Kappenberger Intravascular to
Prevent and stent occlusion after transluminal reestenosis angioplsty. N Engl J
Med 1987; 316:701-6.
61. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, Gaglione A,
Goldberg SL, Tobis JM. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation
accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation. 1995, 91:1676-
88.
62. Barragan, P. , Sainsous, J. , Silvestri, M. , Bouvier JL, Comet, B. ; Simeoni, JB;
Charmasson, C. , Bremondy, M. Ticlopidine and subcutaneous heparin to an
alternative regimen Following coronary stenting. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Diag.1994;
32:133-8.
63. Sousa AG, Mattos LA, Campos Neto CM, Carvalho HG, Stella FP, Nunes G.
Percutaneous myocardial revascularization procedures in Brazil in 1996 - 1997
Compared to the 1992-1993 period: the report of the National Registry - National
Center for Cardiovascular Interventions (CENIC)]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1998, 70:
423-30.
64. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, J Fajadet Ban HE, Perin M, et al. The
randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for
coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 2002, 346: 1773-80.
65. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Holmes DR, O'Shaughnessy C., et
al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in pacientes with stenosis in a
native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1315-23.
66. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, Mont EK, FD Kolodgie, Ladich E, et al. Pathology of
drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 2006, 48: 193-202.
67. Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, Rickenbacher P, Hunziker P, C
Mueller, et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the
benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-
metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48: 2584-91.
115
68. Sastry S, Morice MC. Are drug-eluting stents safe and effective in the long term?
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010, 95 (5) :663-70.
69. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, Ph.D., Marie-Claude Morice, MD, A. Pieter Kappetein,
MD, Ph.D., Antonio Colombo, MD, David R. Holmes, MD, Michael J. Mack,
MD, Elisabeth Ståhle, MD, Ted E. Feldman, MD, Marcel van den Brand, MD,
Eric J. Bass, BA, Nic Van Dyck, RN, Katrin Leadley, MD, Keith D. Dawkins,
MD, and Friedrich W. Mohr, MD, Ph.D. SYNTAX for the Investigators.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for
Severe Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:961-972
70. Jones RH, Kesler K, Phillips HR 3rd, Mark DB, Smith PK, Nelson CL, Newman
MF, Reves JG, Anderson RW, Califf RM. Long-term survival benefits of
coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in
pacientes with coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996, 111 (5)
:1013-25.
71. ACC / AHA 2004 - Guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a
report of the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association task
force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1999 Guidelines for
coronary artery bypass graft surgery). Circulation. 2004, 110 (14): e340-437.
72. ESC 2006 Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive
summary: The Task Force on the management of stable angina pectoris of the
European Society of Cardiology.; ESC Committee for practice guidelines (CPG).
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun, 27 (11) :1341-81.
73. ACCF / SCAI / STS / AATS / AHA / ASNC 2009 Appropriateness criteria for
coronary revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology
Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American
Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American
Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of
Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009, 53 (6) :530-53.
74. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic
tool grading the complexity of CAD. EuroInterv 2005; 1: 219-227.
75. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators.
Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angio- plasty in patients with
multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:217–225.
76. CABRI Trial: First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass
Revascularisation Investigation). Lancet 1995 Nov 4; 346(8984): 1179-84
116
77. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized
Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Lancet. 1993 Mar
6;341(8845):573-80.
78. Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST).J Am
Coll Cardiol. 2000 Apr;35(5):1116-21.
79. Angiographic follow-up results of a randomized study on angioplasty versus
bypass surgery (GABI trial). GABI Study Group. Eur Heart J. 1996
Aug;17(8):1192-8.
80. The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized
trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal
left anterior descending artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Dec;26(7):1600-
5.
81. Three-year follow-up of the argentine randomized trial of percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in
multivessel disease (ERACI). Journal of the American College of
Cardiology,Volume 27, Issue 5, April 1996, Pages 1178–1184
82. The Final Analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS)
Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):575-581.
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.082
83. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with
stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or
Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 Sep 28;360(9338):965-
70.
84. Ten-Year Follow-Up Survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study
(MASS II). Circulation. 2010; 122: 949-957
85. AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(11):1951-1954. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02560-3
86. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ,
Stahle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ and others. Percutaneous
coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass graft-ing for severe coronary
artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961-72
87. Kappetein AP. Optimal revascularization strategy in patients with three-vessel
disease and/or left main disease: The 2-year Outcomes of the SYNTAX Trial. The
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2009.
88. Kapur A. CARDia trial (Coronary Artery Revascularisation in Diabetes).
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress September 2008.
117
89. Serruys PW, Lemos PA, van Hout BA. Sirolimus eluting stent implantation for
patients with multivessel disease: rationale for the Arterial Revascularisation
Therapies Study part II (ARTS II). Heart. 2004;90:995-8.
90. Rodriguez AE, Maree AO, Mieres J, Berrocal D, Grinfeld L, Fernandez-Pereira C,
Curotto V, Rodriguez-Granillo A, O'Neill W, PalaciosIF. Late loss of early benefit
from drug-eluting stents when com-pared with bare-metal stents and coronary
artery bypass surgery: 3 years follow-up of the ERACI III registry. Eur Heart J.
2007;28:2118-25.
91. Oliveira, SA.; Zerbini, EJ.; Barchi, CA.; Marrara, JP.; Carvalho, VB.; Mady, C.;
Armelin, E., Castillo, J.; Macruz, R., Pileggi, F. Intermediate syndrome, results of
surgical treatment. Arq Bras Cardiol . 1975; 28:89-98.
92. Buffolo, E., Andrade JCS; Succi, JE; Lion, LEV; Cueva, C, White, JNR; C.
Gallucci Direct myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary
bypass.Description of technique and early results . Arq Bras Cardiol.1982:38:365-
73.
93. Buffolo, E; Andrade, JCS; Succi, J; Lion, LEV; C. Gallucci Direct myocardial
revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon.
1985; 33:26-9.
94. Benetti FJ. Direct coronary surgery with saphenous vein bypass without either
cardiopulmonary bypass or cardiac arrest. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1985, 26:217-22.
95. Benetti FJ, Naselli G, M Wood, L. Geffner Direct mycardial revascularization
without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. Chest 1991;
100:312-6.
96. Rivetti LA; Gandra SMA; Silva AMRP; Campagnucci VP. Myocardial
revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass, using a intracardiac shunt: 12
years' experience. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc . 1997, 12 (3) :226-32.
97. Stanbridge R, GV Symons; Banwell PE. Minimal-access surgery for coronary
artery revascularisation. (Letter). Lancet 1995, 346:837.
98. Benetti FJ, Ballester C; Sani G, P Doonstra; Grandjean J. Video assisted coronary
bypass surgery. J. Card. Surg. 1995, 10:620-5.
99. AM Calafiore, GD Angelini, J Bergsland, TA Salerno Minimally invasive
coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996, 62:1545-8.
100. Nataf P. Lima L, Regan M; Benarim S; Pavie A, Cabrol C; Gandjbakch, I.
Minimally invasive coronary surgery with thoracoscopic internal mammary artery
dissection: surgical technique. J. Card. Surg. 1996, 11:288-92.
101. Borst C, Jansen EWL; Tulleken CAF; Grundeman PF; Beck HJM; Dongen
JWF; Hodde KC; Bredee JJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting without
118
cardiopulmonary bypass and without interruption of native coronary flow using a
novel anastomosis site restraining device ('Octopus'). J. Am Coll. Cardiol. 1996,
27:1356-64.
102. Subramanian VA; Mccabe JC, Geller CM. Minimally invasive direct coronary
artery bypass grafting: two-year clinical experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997,
64:1648-55.
103. And Buffolo; Gerola LR. Coronary artery bypass grafting without
cardiopulmonary bypass through sternotomy and minimally invasive procedure.
Int J Cardiol. 1997, 62 (Suppl I): S89 - S 93.
104. Jatene F; Fernandes PMP; Hayata ALS; Arbulu HEV; Stolf NAG; Oliveira
SA; Kalil R; hueb W; Jatene AD. VATS for complete dissection of Lima in
minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1997, 63
(Suppl): S 110 - 13.
105. Braile DM, Leal JCF.; Soares MJ; Godoi MF; Paiva O; Junior OP; Brandi AC;
Braille MCVB; Avanci LE; Zaiantchick M. Revascularization grafting with
minimally invasive surgery (MIDCAB): results in 46 patients. Rev. Bras. Cir.
Cardiovasc. 1998, 13:194-7.
106. Oliveira SA, Lisbon LA, LA Dallan, SO Rojas, Poli de Figueiredo
LF.Minimally invasive single-vessel coronary artery bypass with the internal
thoracic artery and early postoperative angiography: midterm results of a
prospective study in 120 consecutive patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002, 73 (2)
:505-10.
107. Lisbon LA, LA Dallan, De Figueiredo LF, Molnar L, Filho EM, Ramires JA,
SA De Oliveira. A prospective comparison of Doppler echocardiography and
postoperative angiography in the assessment of left internal thoracic artery graft in
72 pacientes submitted to minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Heart
Surg Forum. 2002; 5 Suppl 4: S362-77.
108. Mohr FW, Falk V Diegeler A, Walther T Gummert JF, Bucerius J Jacobs S,
Autschbach R. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148
patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001, 121 (5) :842-53.
109. Kappert U, Schneider J, Cichon R, V Gulielmos, Tugtekin SM, Nicolai J,
Matschke K, Schueler S. Development of robotic enhanced endoscopic surgery for
the treatment of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001, 104 (12 Suppl 1):
I102-7
110. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, The Chevtchik, Bonaros N, Ott H,
Friedrich G, Weidinger F, Laufer G. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery
bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2004, 127 (2) :504-10.
119
111. Bonatti J, Schachner T Bonaros N, Oehlinger A, Wiedemann D, E Ruetzler,
Weidinger F, Kolbitsch C, G Feuchtner, Zimrin D, Friedrich G, Pachinger O,
Laufer G. Effectiveness and safety of full endoscopic left internal mammary artery
bypass graft to the left anterior descending artery. Am J Cardiol. 2009, 104 (12)
:1684-8.
112. Kappert U, Tugtekin SM, Cichon R, Braun M, Matschke K. Robotic totally
endoscopic coronary artery bypass: a word of caution implicated by a five-year
follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008, 135 (4) :857-62.
113. Ryan TJ, Faxon, DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King III, SB; Loop, FD;
Petersom, KL, Reeves TJ, Williams, DO, JR Winters, W. L. Guidelines for
percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1988; 78:486-502.
114. Detre, K. , Holubkov, R. , Kelsey, S. , And tHE Co-Investigators of the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Intitute's percutaneous Transluiminal Coronary
Angioplasty Registry. Percutaneous coronary transluiminal angioplasty in 1985-
1986 and 1977-1981. N. Engl. J. Med 1988; 318:265-70.
115. King III, SB. The development of interventional cardiology.J. Am Col.
Cardiol.1998, 31:64 B-88B.