JEL classification: F23, M16, O32

(

;bv

w r a rw v w r h J SRN RL (&& ia

w hC 6ih5WLSK V JVM :NVMN WV ' .1 6J K JVM I LSN (&&'ia

y w t h6 N ZN JVM BJZNT (&& 1 8WVZJVJ NZ JT% (&&,1BNZ NTTR (&''iu g h4NTMN KW NZ JT% (&& e 5J RUJVNZ JT% (&&. 1 9JUKJ MNTTJ ' ( 1 I LSN NZ JT% (&&( i v a t5J RUJV NZ JT%h(&'&i g g g

rg g w a JRNZZJh(&' iw ' v (&&, g w

g t g g r rw g g r t a

rs g gt r a tr y w r a t

h RL ZNVZ JTN JVM RL ZNVZ JTN (&& 1 A KW V NZ JT% ' .iug h t RNT NV JVM 9 MN PJV (&'(i w

y r av r w r ra

h(&')i (&&) v (&&s w

o a , wr a r s

y w r a sy v r w

r ara

v aur w t

a ug g w t v

s aw r w

)

g gw r a

uz g g r (&&' v(&& t

g sag g g g

w t r vr t w

r sa ww r s t w g g

w w r g g wr w y r a

g g w ry rw w r a

g g g gr sa v g

g w w rg g w

w rw a

u a ;;z a ;;; r g

r a ;G Gr r a

;;bw g g

y r h t 5J RUJV NZ JT% (&&. e 5WLSK VJVM :NVMN WV ' . e 5W NV NZ JT% (&&( e I LSN NZ JT% (&&( ia f

g t w ar c

a t cuz g g

h4 JV ZNZZN JVM = WV (&& 1 :JTT NZ JT (&&) iar

y w h=TN W RLS NZ JT% ' ia uzw r r

r r w w h8TNURVP JVMDW NV WV (&& 1 CW NVKN P ' &ia t

w y r zr v r vv vv z

w h8JK R RW (&& 1 8TNURVP JVM DW NV WV (&& ia w

w hCW NVKN P ' &iav a

uz y r y wuz rs

wr w h8JK R RW (&& ia

g g vra t y w

r h4JUOW M JVM 7 V Z (&&(iaf w r h RL ZNVZ JTN JVM

RL ZNVZ JTN (&& 1 J TJ JVM :JPNMWW V ' 1 A KW V NZ JT% ' .iaw t w r a

w uz gt w r h RV NZ JT% (&'(ia

z y uz rhHJPVN (&&. ia t t

r h3 L RK PR JVM 5WLW (&& iag r w

a t :WNSUJV NZ JT%h(&'&i )) g gg uz g

r as c ur y r

s f ag g z rhDR UWV JVM

JVN (&& ia yr z rh:WNSUJV NZ JT% (&'&ia

v s w w wy c r a t

vz w a z v

r g w ag

gw h3VMN WV NZ JT% (&& 1 4NTMN KW (&&)1 8 W Z (&&'1 JVN JVM

KJZSRV ' .1 B NVN JVM 3TUNRMJ (&&.1 DJVZJVPNTW (&''ia gw g

g s y r rt a sv

w sh5JVZ NTT (&& 1 5JVZ NTT JVM MJKUR (&''1 8 W Z (&&'1DWVP NZ JT% (&''ia g ur

z a w g gr w g g

v w y t as

w ra t r g g v yw t a

'd uz g g ww r y a

(d uz g gw r y a

s vrw y t a t c h(&'(i w

y t rr r r a ur

r w w w v k w y )r g t

w kw ). r r a v v sw

rs g wv r aur t

w k w ' y

,

w r a s rt gg w v v v r

t at

r w r y t a

)d g g w w ry a

;;;b g

ura

r g g D5ABFD aD5ABFD cc c c r r g ga y ur

r h3 L RK PR JVM 5WLW (&& 1 4 ZL N JVM NOO N (&& ia sg a

r s w ra h r i

' r (aw r s

ag uz k h g c i

c cl ;DE7B c m a

gg a D5ABFD r

r w vv r

1 "University", "College", "Institute of Technology", "Polytechnic", "Medical School", “Graduate School”

2

a wr h J RN JVM RTTN (&&.1 RV NZ JT% (&'(i r) w r

a s (&&' v (&&g a w

v c r a

g a r h;;Bi;;B g g v a;;B g g

g r uu r h9WZW JVM WZW J R (&& ia

r uzw )

cw h) i h i h:JTT NZ JT%(&& 1 :J WOO NZ JT% ' ia

ur y vr h (&&,1 (&'&ia

rku k r

u a

gs v

r w r r ka(&&' v (&&

(( ',. r a

w ' a rw w r w v a

w ur w v a

.

' h(&&' n(&& i

w zr w

( a w '%'(' % . r a v

w t v y v z r w vav z t

aw &%(( &%(, r a

v w w yv z r a

a w ,%,',%)' r a

w yv z r w v a)

w y z r wr

w y zr w v a ur

w z r w a

3

������������� ������������

�� ��

�� % % % %

��� % %

����� % % %

������� % % %

( h(&&' n(&& i

) a ur r a y w r

h i r h( i ah'.i h' iw r r a y

h i h i (w g r r w v a

)

���������� �� ��������� ��

� �� � ��

������ ��� ���� ��� ����

��������� ��� ���� ��� ����

����������� ��� ���� ��� ����

�� ��� �

���� %%

(���� $�

����� $�

"#���� $��

*� $��

)&%� $�

����� $� %

����� $�

&'�

�� $�

���

�!

'&

r sa ( hu i r huz u g g iw s

t r v a' uz rg g s

r a v at g gr ' r &% y

r r & a( g gr g g f r a

uz A756 g a(

r (w a t w r

a

4

''

0h(&&' n(&& i

g g sw s r v r a

w ',&%r ( %) r a

&%((&%)) y r a

,%( ,%r a ,%,

r w w r w v ag g r

a g gw ()'% ( r

(&(%. r a&%() &%(. r a

%,%, r a ,%,

r w v ag g s

� ��� � ���

�������! ������ ���'�

$#�"� ��� ������ ��� ������

$#�"����' ��� ���� ��� ����

$#�"�����% ��� ��� ��� ���

�&��� ������ ���'�

$#�"� �� ����� ��� ����

$#�"����' �� ���� ��� ���

$#�"�����% �� ��� ��� ���

�������!��&��� ��������� ������'�

$#�"� ��� ��� ��� ����

$#�"����' ��� ���� ��� ���

$#�"�����% ��� � ��� ��

'(

g ga g g

w t rz sa

g g r vw'..%.' r

(. % r a r vw&%(( &%) r a

r vw ,%&%' r a w r

wv y r w v aw 'u ( a

' h i0

( h i0

'

u g g rw w sr g r r

w t a s uz r ag g w

r z wa w h i

.%, g r hi % g r a r

w y r w v a

0 r rh(&&' n(&& i

s (&&' v (&&t '& g ra

urr uz r a

uzw )

c w h) ia u

5

������ �� ������ ����

� �

����� % % %

�������

'

h;;Bi ;;B g gv a

r ra r

g g ra

a wv sv g g

s r av aw v sv

g gC 6 a

g g w sv g g

a

gg t w

r g a ga g

uz aw w

a r g ' wuz a

a tuz '

a g g (&&)hE N 3LJMNURL CJVSRVP WO

HW TMFVR N RZRN ik r g ga g g

g g a w 'a

t g a

',

u g ' r ar u ,u a

, 2)(�! �� #� #�

*32�-!���� ����� ������ � ���

'��)�$%+ ���� ���� � �

'��)����5 ��� ���� � ���

6�%+ ���� ���� � �

��9:�!; ����� ���� ��� �����

���7/� ���� ���� � ���

*3�8�� ���� ���� � ����

.��� ���� ���� ���� ����

'��)���! ��� ��� � ��

'�����,�04"!:�!; ��� ���� � ����

������,�04"!:�!; ��� ���� � ���

'����������1&( ����� ���� ����� ����

()

� � � � � � � �� �� ��

� #,+�&����� �

� ��"���$ ���� �

� ��"����. ���� ���� �

� /��$ ���� ���� ���� �

� ��23��4 ���� ���� ���� ���� �

���0(� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����� �

#,�1� ����� ���� ����� ����� ����� ���� �

� '�� ���� ���� ��� ���� ��� ���� ����� �

� ��"���� ���� ��� ���� ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� �

�� �����%�)-��3��4 ���� ���� ���� ����� ���� ���� ����� ���� ���� �

�� ������%�)-��3��4 ���� ��� ���� ���� ���� ���� ����� ���� ���� ��� �

�� ����������*�! ���� ��� ��� ���� ���� ���� ����� ����� ����� ���� ����� �

-

25Fl - E gm I lt v (

* gm l o d df E f gm avl fl vf E fl va l I I

m d f E g gl lV d fm mgV caE a I I l

l d fm d aE l I I lm l V

gV l E acf l l l l

m aE

- l 1 98 0 9 49 6 B9 6 3 89

m E m l E

46"� >,54�/ 5123 5123 5123 5123( 5123)

)��+�#'-

*** *-(

)��+����8 )-

)( *

�9�'- * -))

)* )*

�= -) -

* * -* *)

���:1� ** ( ( ( ()

(- ) (- (

,5�<�� -- ( - (

- ) -

0��� - ) - ( ))-

-) - - - - (

)��+��� ) ) *)

( ) ( ( )

)�����.� 27! * * * *

- ) -

������.� 27! * ) ( -) *

- (

)����������3(* ) - - ( * )

( ) (

���� .4036121 .4036121 .4036121 .4036121 .4036121

� ; ( )- )( ( ) )

)( ** )) * * ) *

&$

% ) ) ) ) )

.

5Fgm l l l g l

av l f f ll I caE

I I l gl l x I Il l fil l f l a

v ltl l a caEl lt f f

ltl l l El I I l lm a f l cf

E l I I l g mf cf E l I I lg m gl l m m l

EI I l gl l x I I

l l d f av caE mI I l l i l

m l l v aE a I Ig i l m l l

v caE g I I l li l m l l v m g

V caEl l E

f l m l lt fl gm E l l

m g E l g l dil g f f

I gV Ef m l cf E

a l g I Il gdd I gV E

l m l l I I l lcf cf f l g Ed l

l gm E l f

(

m l f Eg m l a E gm

x l g a l f g Ef g n l gl f

E a l m l l l f lE l f m l

f E ll g a va

E fm x il I fg f l l m n

E n l l g a x il f m l m il m

E ( ( * gl g xx E l l n l I

a El l l fm l E fm

a ca l a ffx l x a e

lE a gm l

ca l gl l la E

(

����

( , M l N, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-018, .

( M I a lN, NISTEP Discussion Paper No 125, %

( * M a l N, NISTEP Discussion Paper No.109, %

( M m N , ) ( ) ( )%Andersson, U., Björkman, I. & Forsgren, M. (2005) Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: the

effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review,

14(5), 521–38.

Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004) International partnerships for knowledge in business and academia

A comparison between Europe and the USA. Technovation, 24(7), 517–528.

Bamford, J., & Ernst, D. (2002). Managing an alliance portfolio. McKinsey on Finance, 5, 6–10.

Belderbos, R. A. (2003) Entry mode, organizational learning, and R&D in foreign affiliates: Evidence

from Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3): 235-259.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004) R&D cooperation and firm performance. Research

Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492.

Branstetter, L., & Kwon, H. (2004) The restructuring of Japanese research and development: The

increasing impact of science on Japanese R&D. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 04-E-021.

Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2005) The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry–academia

collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment. Technovation,

25(11), 1273-1280.

Cantwell, J. (2009) Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Businesss

Studies, 40(1): 35–41.

Cantwell, J. A., & Mudambi, R. (2011) Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing

in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 206–232.

Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008) In search of performance effects of (in) direct

industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646.

Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2010) Diversity of Science Linkages: A Survey of

Innovation Performance Effects and Some Evidence from Flemish Firms. Economics, 4, 2010-33.

Cockburn, I., & Henderson, R. (1998) Absorptive Capacity, Co-authoring behaviour, and the

Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.

Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on

industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.

Darby, L., & Zucker, M. (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture,

and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.

((

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying

the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313.7.

Fabrizio, K. (2009) Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38(2), 255-

267.

Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management

Journal, 25, 909-928.

Fontana, R., Geuna, A. & Matt, M. (2006) Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The

importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.

Frost T. (2001) The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovation. Strategic Management

Journal, 22(2), 101–124.

Gambardella, A. (1992) Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US

pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s. Research Policy, 21(5), 391-407.

Goto, A. & Motohashi, K. (2007) Construction of a Japanese Patent Database and a First Look at

Japanese Patenting Activities. Research Policy, 36(9), 1431-1442.

Hall, B., Link, A., & Scott, J. (2003) Universities as Research Partners, The Review of Economics

and Statistics, 85(2), 485-491.

Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005) Market value and patent citations. Rand Journal of

Economics, 36(1), 16-38.

Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., & Vogel, K. (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented

inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.

Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. (2010) Research collaboration at a distance: Changing

spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662-673.

Klevorick, A., Levin, R., Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1995) On the sources and significance of inter-

industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185-205.

Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning.

Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477.

Lavie, D. & Miller, S. (2008) Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance.

Organization Science, 19(4), 623–646.

Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2004). Alliance functions: implications of the international

multi-R&D-alliance perspective. Technovation, 24(7), 541–552.

Lin, C., Wu, Y. J., Chang, C. C., Wang, W., Lee, C. Y. (2012) The alliance innovation performance

of R&D alliances — the absorptive capacity perspective. Technovation, 32(5), 282–292.

Maietta, O. (2015) Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation:

A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44, 1341-1359.

Markiewicz, K. (2004) Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from Pharmaceutical and

Biotechnology firms, working paper, UC-Berkeley.

()

Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. (1999) Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards

international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19, 283–294.

Nielsen, B., & Gudergan, S. (2012) Exploration and exploitation fit and performance in international

strategic alliances. International Business Review, 21(4), 558-574.

Osborn, R., Hagedoorn, J., Denekamp, J., Duysters, G., & Baughn, C. (1998) Embedded Patterns of

International Alliance Formation. Organization Studies 19, 617-638.

Petruzzelli, A. (2011) The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance

on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation 31, 309-319.

Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008) Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge

assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 901–

919.

Rosenberg, N. (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19(2),

165-174.

Santangelo, G. (2011) The tension of information sharing: Effects on subsidiary embeddedness.

International Business Review, 21(2), 180–195.

Sirmon, D., & Lane, P. (2004) A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance.

Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 306-319.

Song, J., Asakawa, K., & Chu, Y. (2011) What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of

overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals. Research

Policy, 40(3), 380–390.

Wagner, C. (2008) The new invisible college: Science for Development. Washington: Brookings

Institution Press.

Zucker, L., & Darby, M. (2001) Capturing Technological Opportunity via Japan's Star Scientists:

Evidence from Japanese Firms' Biotech Patents and Products. The Journal of Technology Transfer,

vol. 26(1), 37-58.

Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Armstrong, J. (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science,

knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.