F O R C E D E T E R M IN A T IO N A N D D Y N A M IC P R O P E R T...
Transcript of F O R C E D E T E R M IN A T IO N A N D D Y N A M IC P R O P E R T...
M E T U F O O T B R I D G E : C A B L E M E T U F O O T B R I D G E : C A B L E
F O R C E D E T E R M I N A T I O N
I S T A N B U L B R I D G E C O N F E R E N C E , 2 0 1 4
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 41
P R O P E R T I E S
A N D D Y N A M I C
P R O P E R T I E S
N J O M O W . 1 a n d A . T U R E R 2
1 P h D . C a n d i d a t e , D e p t . o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g , M i d d l e E a s t T e c h n i c a l
U n i v e r s i t y , 0 6 8 0 0 A n k a r a , T U R K E Y
2 A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r , D e p t . o f C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g , M i d d l e E a s t
T e c h n i c a l U n i v e r s i t y , 0 6 8 0 0 A n k a r a , T U R K E YM ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 41M E TU F ootb rid g e
C O N T E N T S2
�� C as e D efinitionC as e D efinition
�� C ab l e Tens il e F orc esC ab l e Tens il e F orc es
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
�� D ec k’ s D ynam ic P rop ertiesD ec k’ s D ynam ic P rop erties
�� C onc l us ion/ D is c us s ionsC onc l us ion/ D is c us s ions
C A S E C A S E
D E F I N I T I O ND E F I N I T I O N�� D efinitionD efinition
�� L oc ationL oc ation
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 3
�� L oc ationL oc ation
�� D im ens ionsD im ens ions
�� H is toryH is tory
C A S E D E F I N I TI O NC A S E D E F I N I TI O N4
S t a y e d -
c a b l e B r i d g e
w i t h
m e t a l l i c
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
L o c a t i o n :
D um l up inar
B oul ev ard ;
W i d t h : ab out
5 . 0 0 m ;
L e n g t h :
d e c k
C A S E D E F I N I TI O NC A S E D E F I N I TI O N5
S t a y e d -
c a b l e B r i d g e
w i t h
m e t a l l i c
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
d e c k
C A S E D E F I N I TI O NC A S E D E F I N I TI O N6
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
C A B L E T E N S I L E C A B L E T E N S I L E
F O R C E SF O R C E S�� TheoryTheory
�� M eas urem entsM eas urem ents
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 7
�� M eas urem entsM eas urem ents
�� D ata P roc es s ingD ata P roc es s ing
�� Res ul ts and I nterp retationRes ul ts and I nterp retation
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
8
M ethod 0 1 : T a ut guita r strin g method
• m (= 1 4 . 1 0 kg / m ) is the l inear m as s d ens ity
in kg / m ;
• L is the c ab l e l eng th b etween anc horag es in m ;
• f is the frequenc y in H z c orres p ond ing to
� =4��2��
2
�2
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
• fn is the frequenc y in H z c orres p ond ing to
m od e ord er nD oes not ac c ount for:• c ab l e b end ing s tiffnes s ;• m aterial ’ s m od ul us of el as tic ity;• c ros s -s ec tional area;• m om ent of inertia;• b ound ary c ond itions
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
9
M ethod 0 2 : Zui H , S hinke T, and N am ita Y [3 ]
1 -I n the c as e of us ing the natural frequenc y of firs t-ord er m od e (s uffic ientl y s m al l s ag 3 ≤ Γ)
2 - I n the c as e of us ing the natural frequenc y of s ec ond -ord er m od e (s uffic ientl y
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
2 - I n the c as e of us ing the natural frequenc y of s ec ond -ord er m od e (s uffic ientl y s m al l s ag 3 ≥Γ)
3 -I n the c as e of us ing the natural frequenc y of hig h-ord er m od es (v ery l ong c ab l e 2 ≤ Γ)
• E : the m od ul us of el as tic ity ;
• A : the c ros s -s ec tional area, (= 1 . 73 5 E -3
m 2 );
• I : m om ent of inertia, (= 2 . 3 95 3 1 E -3
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 0
M ethod 0 3: Wenzel H . and P ic hl er D . [4 ]
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
M E A S U R E M E N T S1 1
M a teria l:
Two triaxial ac c el erom eters (M ic ros train)
O ne d atal og g er
O ne P C to run with ap p rop riate s oftware and s av e d ata
P roced ure:
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
P roced ure:
E xc itation of eac h c ab l e and d ata rec ord two or three tim es
E xc itation of d ec k and d ata rec ord three tim es
P erson n el:
F our g roup s of M E TU inv es tig ators , eac h in years 2 0 0 5 , 2 0 1 1 ,
2 0 1 2 and 2 0 1 3 , res p ec tiv el y.
M E A S U R E M E N T S1 2
S en sor L oca tion s
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
D A T A P R O C E S S I N G1 3
A bsolute va lues a fter F F T plotted in frequen cy d oma in for ca ble 1
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
D A T A P R O C E S S I N G1 4
Mo d e 1 Mo d e 2 Mo d e 3 Mo d e 4 Mo d e 5
C a bl e 1 0.5631 1.126 1.766 2.278 2.918
C a bl e 2 0.5631 1.152 1.715 2.304 2.969
C a bl e 3 0.8191 1.638 2.483 3.328 4.198
C a bl e 4 0.6655 1.357 2.048 2.739 3.481
F irst five frequen cies for ea ch ca ble (2 0 1 3)
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
C a bl e 4 0.6655 1.357 2.048 2.739 3.481
C a bl e 5 0.8447 1.689 2.534 3.507 4.377
C a bl e 6 0.9727 1.945 2.944 4.070 5.068
C a bl e 7 1.305 2.611 3.993 5.299 6.681
C a bl e 8 1.3820 2.765 4.198 5.606 7.039
C a bl e 9 0.8959 1.817 2.867 3.942 5.094
C a bl e 1 0 0.8191 1.638 2.611 3.66 4.761
C a bl e
1 1 1.305 2.713 4.172 5.734 7.756
C a bl e
1 2 1.3310 2.790 4.300 5.964 7.910
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 5
G ra phica l represen ta tion of a xia l loa d d istribution -Y ea r 2 0 0 5
60
80
100
120
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
20
40
60
Cables ID
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
0 P a n el
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 6
G ra phica l represen ta tion of a xia l loa d d istribution -Y ea r 2 0 1 1
60
80
100
120
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
20
40
60
Cables ID
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
0 P a n el
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 7
G ra phica l represen ta tion of a xia l loa d d istribution - Y ea r 2 0 1 2
100
150
200
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
50
Cables ID
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
1 P a n el
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 8
G ra phica l represen ta tion of a xia l loa d d istribution -Y ea r 2 0 1 3
100
150
200
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
Method 1
Method 2
Method 3
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
50
Cables ID
Ax
ial
loa
d i
n k
N
2 P a n els
C A B L E T E N S I L E F O R C E S
1 9
E volution of ca bles’ forces a lon g ca mpa ign s
120
140
160
180
200
Axi
al C
able
Fo
rce
(kN
)
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Axi
al C
able
Fo
rce
(kN
)
Cable ID
2005
2011
2012
2013
D E C K’S D Y N A M I C D E C K’S D Y N A M I C
P R O P E R T I E SP R O P E R T I E S�� M eas urem entM eas urem ent
�� A nal ytic al m od elA nal ytic al m od el
�� M od e id entific ationM od e id entific ation
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 2 0
�� M od e id entific ationM od e id entific ation
�� S truc tural I d entific ationS truc tural I d entific ation
�� M as sM as s
�� S tiffnes sS tiffnes s
M E A S U R E M E N T S2 1
S en sor L oca tion s
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
D A T A P R O C E S S I N G2 2
A b s ol ute v al ue of Y-D irec tion
A b s ol ute v al ue of Z-D irec tion
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
I m ag inary p art of Z-D irec tion
I m ag inary p art of Y-D irec tion
W est N od e
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 3
F in ite E lemen t M od els
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 4
F in ite E lemen t M od els
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 5
S t r u c t u r a l
p o r t i o n s
M o d eF r e q u e n c y
( H z )
D i r e c t i o nS h a p e
d e s c r i p t i o n
R a w
a n a l y t i c a l
P a n e l s l a t e r a l
s a m e
d i r e c t i o n1 . 4 5 0 4 3
o p p o s i t e
d i r e c t i o n1 . 4 6 0 5
1 s t b e n d i n g 4 . 6 6 4 0 3
2 n d b e n d i n g 8 . 9 8 2 4 9
R a w A n a lytica l F requen cies
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
D e c k
v e r t i c a l
2 n d b e n d i n g 8 . 9 8 2 4 9
3 r d b e n d i n g 2 0 . 6 0 4 0 3
4 t h b e n d i n g 2 3 . 3 2 4 7 6
5 t h b e n d i n g 2 6 . 1 7 1 2 6
l a t e r a l
1 s t b e n d i n g 5 . 5 8 0 7 9
2 n d b e n d i n g 1 2 . 9 6 0 6 7
3 r d b e n d i n g 2 2 . 8 6 1 8 6
t o r s i o n1 s t t w i s t i n g 8 . 1 0 8 7
2 n d t w i s t i n g 1 5 . 0 8 4 6 9
P y l o n
l o n g i t u d i n a l
1 s t b e n d i n g 7 . 3 0 6 9 1
2 n d b e n d i n g 1 0 . 4 1 5 1 2
3 r d b e n d i n g 2 4 . 0 9 7 2 8
t r a n s v e r s a l
1 s t b e n d i n g 1 . 7 4 0 9 9
2 n d b e n d i n g 1 0 . 1 1 8 3 8
3 r d b e n d i n g 2 5 . 6 7 7 3
D A T A P R O C E S S I N G2 6
F r e q u e n c y
P e a k 1 P e a k 2 P e a k 3 P e a k 4 P e a k 5
2 . 8 6 7 4 . 0 7 0 4 . 5 3 1 6 . 2 3 6 8 . 5 7 6
Y-
Dir W e s t 0 - 0 - 0
E a s t 0 - 0 + 0
Z-
Dir W e s t + 0 + - -
E a s t + 0 + + -
S a m e S a m e S a m e a n t a g o n i s
S a m e
M od e id en tifica tion
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
C o m m e n t s
S a m e
d i r e c t i o n
d i s p l a c e
m e n t i n
v e r t i c a l
a x i s
w i t h o u t
m o t i o n i n
Y - a x i s
S a m e
d i r e c t i o n
d i s p l a c e
m e n t i n
l a t e r a l
a x i s
w i t h o u t
m o t i o n i n
Z- a x i s
S a m e
d i r e c t i o n
d i s p l a c e
m e n t i n
v e r t i c a l
a x i s
w i t h o u t
m o t i o n i n
Y - a x i s
a n t a g o n i s
t
d i s p l a c e
m e n t i n
v e r t i c a l
a x i s w i t h
m o t i o n i n
Y - a x i s
S a m e
d i r e c t i o n
d i s p l a c e
m e n t i n
v e r t i c a l
a x i s
w i t h o u t
m o t i o n i n
Y - a x i s
C o n c l u s i o n
1 s t
v e r t i c a l
b e n d i n g
1 s t
t r a n s v e r s
a l
b e n d i n g
2 n d
v e r t i c a l
b e n d i n g
1 s t
t o r s i o n a l
3 r d
v e r t i c a l
b e n d i n g
m o d e
L e g e n d :
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 7U pd a tin g P rocess
P a ra meters R a w Va lues U pd a ted Va lues
M a ss d en sity of pa n el ma teria l:
5 4 . 1 6 kg / m 3 5 3 . 1 2 2 kg / m 3
E la stic mod ulus of pa n el ma teria l:
69 0 0 0 M P a 67 62 0 M P a
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
ma teria l: 69 0 0 0 M P a 67 62 0 M P a
S tiffn ess con tribution of pa n els:
1 0 0 % 1 %
T hickn ess of pa n els: 5 0 c m 3 0 c m
P a n el lin ks:75 0 0 0 0 N / m 75 0 0 0 0 N / rad
D eck supports: (s ee in the p ap er)
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 8
A n a l y t i c a l
f r e q u e n c y ( H z )
E x p e r i m e n t a l
f r e q u e n c y ( H z )
1 s t v e r t i c a l b e n d i n g
m o d e4.664 2 . 867
1 s t t r a n s v e r s a l
b e n d i n g m o d e5 . 5 81 4.0 70
2 n d v e r t i c a l
C ompa rison of frequen cy vectors
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
2 n d v e r t i c a l
b e n d i n g m o d e8.9 82 4.5 31
1 s t t o r s i o n a l m o d e 8.1 0 9 6.2 36
3r d v e r t i c a l b e n d i n g
m o d e2 0 . 60 4 8.5 76
E r r o r N o r m 1 73. 5 0 5
A n a l y t i c a l
f r e q u e n c y ( H z )
E x p e r i m e n t a l
f r e q u e n c y ( H z )
1 s t v e r t i c a l b e n d i n g
m o d e3.0 5 3 2 . 867
1 s t t r a n s v e r s a l
b e n d i n g m o d e4.373 4.0 70
2 n d v e r t i c a l
b e n d i n g m o d e5 . 0 2 0 4.5 31
1 s t t o r s i o n a l m o d e 6.2 71 6.2 36
3r d v e r t i c a l b e n d i n g
m o d e7.2 1 6 8.5 76
F I N I T E E L E M E N T M O D E L
2 9
20
25
Fre
qu
en
cy i
n H
z
Updated analytical frequencies
Raw analytical frequencies
C ompa rison of F requen cy Vectors
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
0
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5
Fre
qu
en
cy i
n H
z
Mode
Raw analytical frequencies
Experimental frequencies
D E C K’S D Y N A M I C P R O P E R T I E S
3 0
D eck’s M a ss Va ria tion
m d = 91 74 . 4 1 0 1 kg∆m = 3 92 4 . 771 kg
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
md
∆∆∆∆m
3 92 4 . 771 kg
∆m = 3 94 4 . 3 0 9 kg
D E C K’S D Y N A M I C P R O P E R T I E S
3 1
2 0 0 5 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3
N o p a n e l N o p a n e lo n e s i d e
p a n e l
t w o
s i d e
D eck’s F requen cies a n d S tiffn ess Va ria tion
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
N o p a n e l N o p a n e lp a n e l
s i d e
p a n e l s
V e r t i c a l b e n d i n g
m o d e
F i r s t3 . 1
r a d /se c3 . 0 5 r a d /se c 2 . 9 7 r a d /se c
2 . 8 7
r a d /se c
S e c o n d4 . 8
r a d /se c4 . 8 8 r a d /se c 4 . 5 0 r a d /se c
4 . 5 3
r a d /se c
T h i r d9 . 2
r a d /se c- 8 . 4 3 r a d /se c
8 . 5 8
r a d /se c
F o u r t h1 2 . 1
r a d /se c-
1 2 . 1 4
r a d /se c-
T o r s i o n a l b e n d i n g
m o d ef i r s t
6 . 5
r a d /se c6 . 5 0 r a d /se c 6 . 4 2 r a d /se c
6 . 2 4
r a d /se c
S t i f f n e s s B e n d i n g 9 1 6 k N/m 8 8 7 k N/m 8 5 9 k N/m8 1 6
k N/m
D E C K’S D Y N A M I C P R O P E R T I E S
3 2
D eck’s S tiffn ess Va ria tion
Tors
ion
al s
tiff
ne
ss (
N/r
ad)
Ve
rtic
al s
tiff
ne
ss (
N/m
)
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
Tors
ion
al s
tiff
ne
ss (
N/r
ad)
Ve
rtic
al s
tiff
ne
ss (
N/m
)
Vertical
Torsion
C O N C L U S I O NC O N C L U S I O N
A N DA N D
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 3 3
D I S C U S S I O N SD I S C U S S I O N S
C O N C L U S I O N3 4
• N o c ons id eration of c oup l ers ’ p res enc e
• I n g eneral , M ethod 0 2 g iv es s m al l er
C a bles’ T en sile F orces
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
• I n g eneral , M ethod 0 2 g iv es s m al l er v al ues
• N o m onotonic c hang e of c ab l e forc es d ue to s ag rel ated s ens itiv ity
C O N C L U S I O N3 5
• D es p ite the ad d ition of ad v ertis em ent p anel s one c oul d exp ec t a s l ig ht
D eck’s D yn a mic P roperties
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
p anel s one c oul d exp ec t a s l ig ht s tiffnes s c ontrib ution
• D ec k’ s s tiffnes s c ontinuous l y d ec ays ov er the c ours e of years
C O N C L U S I O N3 6
• C al ib rated d ig ital m od el c an s erv e as a b as is of the s tud y of hum an ind uc ed v ib ration and fatig ue anal ys is
F uture I n vestiga tion s
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
and fatig ue anal ys is
• Rel iab il ity and l ong term b ehav ior of b rid g es s houl d ac c ount for p os s ib l e s tiffnes s and m as s c hang es as they woul d infl uenc e b oth d ynam ic c harac teris tic s and red is trib ution of forc es .
R E F E R E N C E SR E F E R E N C E S
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 3 7
R E F E R E N C E S3 8
1 . The M athworks , I nc . , M a t La b, M athem atic al C om p uting S oftware,
M as s ac hus etts , U S A .
2 . Turer A . , St r uc t ur a l He a l t h M o n i t o r i n g - Le c t ur e No t e s ,
M E TU : S p ring 2 0 1 3 .
3 . Zui H , S hinke T, and N am ita Y. P rac tic al F orm ul as for E s tim ation of
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e
3 . Zui H , S hinke T, and N am ita Y. P rac tic al F orm ul as for E s tim ation of
C ab l e Tens ion b y Vib ration M ethod . A SC E Jo ur n a l o f St r uc t ur a l
E n g i n e e r i n g 1 996; 1 2 2 (6): 65 1 -65 6.
4 . Wens el H , P ic hl er D . A mbi e n t Vi br a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g . Wil ey:
E ng l and , A p ril 2 0 0 5 .
5 . Özerkan T, In s t r ume n t e d M o n i t o r i n g a n d D y n a mi c T e s t i n g
o f M E T U C a bl e St a y e d P e d e s t r i a n Br i d g e a n d
C o mp a r i s o n s a g a i n s t A n a l y t i c a l M o d e l Simul a t i o n s ,
M S c Thes is , M E TU : Turkey, 2 0 0 5 .
T HA N K Y O U F O R T HA N K Y O U F O R
Y O U R Y O U R
M ond ay, A ug us t 2 5 , 2 0 1 4M E TU F ootb rid g e 3 9
Y O U R Y O U R
A T T E N T I O NA T T E N T I O N