Waldemar Stanislaw Mroczkowski, A099 657 732 (BIA Jan. 30, 2012)

8/13/2019 Waldemar Stanislaw Mroczkowski, A099 657 732 (BIA Jan. 30, 2012)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/waldemar-stanislaw-mroczkowski-a099-657-732-bia-jan-30-2012 1/11

TAMARA A. FRENCH, ESQUIRELaw Oice of amara A. French 4632 Second AvenueDetroit, Ml 48201

U.S Depatmen of Jusice

Executive Oce fr Immraon Revew

I O k

5107.eesburg Pike Suit 2000Fal Chrc, Vina 204

HS/ICE Oce of Chief Counsel - DE333 t Elliott St Rm 204Detroit Ml 48207

Name: MROCZKOWSKI WLDMAR STANSAW A099657732

Date of this notice: 1/30/2012

nclosed s a copy of the Board's decson d order the above-rerenced cse.

nclosure

Pael Mebers:Paey, oger

Sncerey

Donn Carrhef Clerk

Cite as: Waldemar Stanislaw Mroczkowski, A099 657 732 (BIA Jan. 30, 2012)

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished



.

U.S epen ofusieE.xecutiv O r Imation Reviw

Decson of th Board ofmgraton Appeals

Fas Chuh, irginia 2204

Fle A099 657 732 Detrot Date

In re WALDEAR STANSLAW ROCZKOWSKI

JAN B021

I OVAL ROCEEDIGS

AEAL

ON EHALF OF RESONDEN amaa A Fren Eqre

ON EHLF OF DHS Robet etzaAtant Che Counel

CHARG

Note Se 237(a )()(A) I& N At [8 USC 1227(a )(l)(A)] namble at tme o entry or ajutment o tat ner eton212(a )(6)(C)() & N At 8 USC 1182(a )(6)(C)() Fra or lll mrereentaton o a materal t (tran)

Se 237(a )()(A) I& N At [8 USC 227(a )()(A)] amble at tme o enty or ajutment o tat ner eton22(a )(7)(A)()() & N At [8 USC l 82(a )(7)(A)()() ant no val mmant va or enry oument (ta)

Se 237(a )()() & N At 8 USC. 1227(a )( l )()] -n the nte State n volaton o la

Se 237(a )()(C)() & At 8 USC § 1227(a )(l )(C)()] Nommrant volate onton o tat

ALICAON Contnae; moton to reman

e reonent aeal the Immraton Jue uly 15 200 eo enyn moton ra otnane Durn he eneny o h aeal the reonent le a moton to reman TeDetment o Homean Sery "HS) ha not e an ooton to the moton e motonwll be ante an the reor ll be remane to te mmraton e r rter roeenontent th t onon an r entry o a ne eon

The DHS le an ooton to e reonent aeal an a moton reuet ummaryaane o the mmato e eon




AQ99 657 732

Thogh hs moon o mn h sonn hs ov vnc h n I30 vs onh b on hs bh b hs Un s cn n s cn nng h h Hog h th c noc h ng o vs on h sonn so ov intera/ia, vnc th hs s mg hs bn n b voc n h h n hs cn m th I s g no h h Io g vos n th

sonns moon connc o th c h h s vs on h bn n bh bcs h sonn s no n c voc om hs s o o mng hscn Un s cn (J 56

Un hs ccsncs t sonns moon n mn co o thImon g h ocngs gng th sonns qs connncnng th ocom o s vs on hs on gb sn o ss Seee.g Clon v. Holder 598 3 486 (8 200 ( moon o on sho b cons ngh o ho th n vnc mgh c h Immgon Jgs cson o conn h csnng th ocom o nng vs on see also Matter of Hashmi 24 I& c 785(I 2009 (n ns noos moon o conn ng th ocom o nng m

bs vs on sho gn b gn th ov o n hm o h primafaciegb sn o ss

Accong h moon b gn n h co b n o h ImgonJg h ocngs conssn hs onon n n o n cson

OER h moon s n n co s mn o h Imon Jg hocngs conssn p n onD cson

OR E O <:

2




( r\

ITED STATES DEPRTMENT OF JUSTICEEXECTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REIEW

U.S IIGTION CORTDetroit, Michigan

File No: A 099 657 732 Juy 15, 2010

In �he Matter of

WLDEMR STISLAW MROCZKOWSKI IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

CRGES

Respondent

Section 237(a((B of the Immgration and Nationality Act (Act, as amene - in that afteramisson as a nonimmgrant under Secton

(a(15 of the Act, yo remaned in the ntedStates for a time longer than permitted in voation of this Act or any other aw of thenite States.

Section 237(a((C (i of the Immgration and Nationalty Act (Act, as amended - n that afteramission as a nonimmigrant uner Section(a(15 of the Act, you have faied to mantanor comply wth the condtons of the nonmmigrantstatus under which you were admitte.

APPLICATIONS: Moton for contnuance

ON BEALF OF RESPONDENT

Tamara A. French, Esire4632 2nd AvenueDetrot, MI 4820

ON BEHALF OF DHS:

Robert Metgar, Assistant Chief Counsel333 Mt. EliottDetrot, MI 48207

ORA DECISION A ORDERS OF TE IMMIGTION DGE

Respondent s an adut, male native and ctzen of Poand.

The Departent of omeland Securty (hereinafter referred to as

"the Governmen ntated reoval proceedngs aainst

respondent prsuant to the authority conaned n Section 240 of

the migraton an Natonaity Act (the Act Proceedings



were coenced wth ths Court by the lng o a Notce to

Appear dated Febrary 26 200 The Court would note that

proceedngs were ntated n the Igraton Court n

Bloongton Mnnesota Whle the proceedngs wer pendng n

Bloongton Mnnesota respondent adtted actual allegatons 1

through 3 dened actual allegatons 4 through 6 and adtted

actual allegatons 7 and 8 he Court would note that he

ntall dened two charges o reovablty under Secton

237(a}(1)(A} to wt nder Sectons 212(a}(6)(C}(} and

212(a}(7)(A} ()(I} o the·Act He conceded the charge o

reovablty under Secton 237(a) {1) {B) There was no adsson

or concesson as to the 237{a) {1) (C}() charge

Sbsequently venue o ths case was changed to Detrot

Mchgan ro Bloongton Mnesota n an order dated Aprl 28

200 At a subsequent Master Calendar hearng conducted beore

the Igraton Court n etrot Mchgan the Governent

wthdrew the charge o reovablty under Secton 237(a) {1)(A}

to wt Secton 212{a)(6)(C {) o the Act It also wthdrew the

underlyng actual allegaton 4 espondent at that sae Master

Calendar hearng also conceded the charge o reovablty under

Secton 237(a){1}(C} () o the Act Subsequently the Governent

also wthdrew the reoval charge under Secton 237{a) (1){A) to

wt Secton 212a} 7 A o the Act The overet so

wthdrew the correspondng underlyng actual allegatons and

6 Thereore the only reanng actual allegatons (1 through

A 0 67 732 2 July 1 2010



3 an an 8 were amitte, an the ony remaining two charges

o removabiit were concee by the responent Responent

requeste that Poan be esignate as the count o remova

shou such action become necessary.

Responent ha initiay requeste mutipe continuances

whie the case was both in Boomington, Minnesota an Detroit,

Michigan base upon his purporte marriage to a Unite States

citizen an a pening I130 petition Responent through

counse, i submit evience going to the bona ies o this

purporte marriage The Courts in both Boomington, Minnesota

an Detroit, Michigan grante mutipe continuances to aow

ajuication o the I130 base upon the responent's purporte

marriage to a Unite States citizen

Utimatey, the matter was continue to a Master Caenar

hearing on Juy , 2010 At that time, the Court inquire as to

the status o the I130 petition. The Court was, at that point

in time, notiie that the I - 130 petition ha been enie b

USCIS in a ecision ate June 22, 2010 The basis o that

enia was that the responent, in act, ha not been ivorce

rom a prior spouse in Poan thereore his puporte marriae

to the current Unite States citizen was not a vai marriae

upon which he cou procee orwar on an I130 petition. Both

resonent n his counse concee to this Court t the ster

Caenar hearing that the responent, in act ha not been

ivorce rom his prior spouse in Poan {athough he inicates,

A 0 32 3 Juy 1 200



a he Cour oes o ecessariy oub ha he was proceeig

o he goo faih basis ha a divorce ha occurre

Respoe hrough his couse reqese a adiioa

coiuace from his Cour o aow he respode a

opporuiy o obai a ega divorce from he prior spouse i

Poad remarry he Uie Saes ciize spouse ad he fie a

seco 130 peio The Cour eermie ha his i o

fa wihi he parameers for a goo cause for a coiuace as

se forh by he Board i Maer of Hashmi 2 & Dec 785 (BI

200) Respoe hrough couse aso dicae ha he d

o wish o reques vouary eparure The Cour cofrme a

of his iformao hrough a ierpreer wih he respoe

Respode i fac iicaed ha he i o wish o pursue

vouary eparure a i was his udersaig ha his

aorey wou be requesig a coiuace ad if ha

coiuace wou be eie ha she woud be appeaig ha

eia Therefore he Cour is issuig he isa ecisio as

i does o fi ha he respode has esabishe good cause

for coiuace of his maer

The Cour oes ha a xhibi No 1 was he Noice o

ppear xhibi o 2 is a Form 213 xhibi No 3 were

ocumes submied by he respoe hrough couse goig o

he boa fides of he pupord mariage (whch was subsequey

eermied o be o vaid o he ied Saes cize

Exhibi were aiioa ocumes regarig he boa fies of

0 657 32 Juy 15 200



ha reaonshp dmed as Exhb No 5 was he dena of

he 13 based upon he purpored marrage o he Uned aes

czen ha was subsequeny deermned no o be ad

The aboe conued e documenary edence of record n

hs case Te Cour noes ha under Maer of Ham he

Board deermned ha an appcan's unopposed moon o connue

remoa proceedngs for adjudcaon of a pendng fam-based

sa peon shoud be generay graned f approa of e sa

peon woud render he aen prma ace egbe for

adjusmen of saus The Board saed n Maer of Hahm n

deermnng wheher good cause exs o connue uch

proceedngs he Cour shoud consder numerous facor,

ncudng, bu no med o (1 he Goernmen's respone o

he moon o connue; (2 wheer he underyng sa peon

s prma face approabe; (3) a respondens sauory

egby for adjusmen o saus (4) wheher he

respondens appcaon for adumen of saus mers a

faorabe exercse o dscreon or woud mer suc a faorabe

exercse; and (5 he reaon for he connuance and any oer

reean procedura facors.

n consderng he crcumsance and facs n he nsan

case, hs Cour does no fnd ha has good cause o connue

h maer any furer. The our noe a n e nan

case unke he facs presen beore he Board n Maer o

Ham, here s no onger any pendng I-3 peon The 13

99 657 732 5 uy 15 21



affratvely state on hs own, an throuh hs counsel that he

oes not wsh to fle any other forms of relef, nclun

voluntary eparture Therefore, ths ourt has no coce but to

enter an orer orern the responent remove to Polan

ORDER OF TE ORT

Base upon the foreon the ourt ssues the follown

orers

IT I THEREFORE, ORDERED that responents moton for �

contnuance s ene.

IT I FRTHER ORDERED that base upon� responents pror

amssons an concessons whch st lsh hs removablty by

the requste clear an convncn

be orere remove

removablty

K ETTLEmraton Jue

1 The ourt notes that the responent aan, at allof the remann factual alleatons (exclun the ones thatwere wthrawn) an concee the only two remann chares ofreovablty uner ecton a} (1) B} an a} }}.Base upon these amssons an concessons, hs removabltytherefore has been establshe by the requste cear anconvncn evence He requeste that Polan be esnate asthe country of removal shoul such acton become necessary anthe ourt esnate Polan

A 099 6 3 July 20



CETCATE PAE

hereby cery ha he aache proceeng beore

GE SHA ETTES, n he maer o

WADE STASAW MOCZOWS

A 099 657 73

Dero Mchgan

s an accurae, verbam ranscrp o he recorng as prove by

he Execuve Oce or mmgraon evew an ha hs s he

orgna ranscrp hereo or he e o he Execuve Oce

or mmgraon Revew

na Dock, Transcrree Sae R portng,

S t mb r a 2010(compeon ae)

By submsson o hs CETCATE PAE, he Conracor ceresha a Sony BEC/T47, 4- channe ranscrber or equvaen an/orCD as escrbe n Secon C, paragraph C 3 3 o he conrac,was use o ranscrbe he ecor o Proceeng shown n he aboveparagraph

Waldemar Stanislaw Mroczkowski, A099 657 732 (BIA Jan. 30, 2012)

Documents

Transcript of Waldemar Stanislaw Mroczkowski, A099 657 732 (BIA Jan. 30, 2012)