Erk Jensen, CERN BE-RF · W.K.H. Panofsky, W.A. Wenzel: “Some Considerations Concerning the...
Transcript of Erk Jensen, CERN BE-RF · W.K.H. Panofsky, W.A. Wenzel: “Some Considerations Concerning the...
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Erk Jensen, CERN BE-RF
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 2RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
RR/b
Cavity
Generator
IG
Z
P
C=Q/(Rw0)
Vgap
Beam
IB
L=R/(Qw0)LC
b: coupling factor
R: Shunt impedance : R-upon-Q
Simplification: single mode
We have used this before when explaining the “fast feedback”
3RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 4RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Example: KEK photon factory 500 MHz
- R as good as it gets -
this cavity optimized
pillbox
R/Q: 111 W 107.5 W
Q: 44270 41630
R: 4.9 MW 4.47 MW
Nose cones increase transit time factor, round outer shape minimizes losses.
nose cone
5RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
0 5 10 15 20
t f0
-1
0
1
Voltage induced by a single charge q:
RR/b
Cavity
Beam
C=Q/(Rw0)
V (induced)IB
L=R/(Qw0)LCEnergy deposited by a
single charge q:
Impedance seen by the beam
6RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Vgap
gap voltage
Ploss
Power lost in the cavity walls
W
Energy stored inside the cavity
7RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
The beam current “loads” the generator, in the equivalent circuit this appears as a resistance in parallel to the shunt impedance.
If the generator is matched to the unloaded cavity, beam loading will cause the accelerating voltage to decrease.
The power absorbed by the beam is , the
power loss .
For high efficiency, beam loading shall be high.
The RF to beam efficiency is .
8RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Resonance frequency
Transit time factor
field varies while particle is traversing the gap
Shunt impedance
gap voltage – power relation
Q factor
R/Qindependent of losses – only geometry!
loss factor
Linac definitionCircuit definition
9RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
IB
R3, Q3,w3R2, Q2,w2R1, Q1,w1
......
external dampers
n1 n3n2
10RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
without dampers
with dampers
11RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
electric field (@ 0º) magnetic field (@ 90º)
(only 1/8 shown)(TM110)
12RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
For particles moving virtually at v=c, the integrated transverse force (kick) can be determined from the transverse variation of the integrated longitudinal force!
W.K.H. Panofsky, W.A. Wenzel: “Some Considerations Concerning the Transverse Deflection of Charged
Particles in Radio-Frequency Fields”, RSI 27, 1957]
Pure TE modes: No net transverse force !
Transverse modes are characterized by
• the transverse impedance in w-domain
• the transverse loss factor (kick factor) in t-domain !
13RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
inductive (loop) coupling, low self-inductance
14RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Example shown:80 MHz cavity PS for LHC.
Color-coded:
15RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 16RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 17RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
PEP II cavity476 MHz, single cell,
1 MV gap with 150 kW, strong HOM damping,
LEP normal-conducting Cu RF cavities,350 MHz. 5 cell standing wave + spherical cavity for energy storage, 3 MV
18RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
example for capacitive coupling
cavity
coupling C
19RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 20RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
• The R/Q of a single gap cavity is limited to some 100 W.
Now consider to distribute the available power to n
identical cavities: each will receive P/n, thus produce an
accelerating voltage of .
The total accelerating voltage thus increased,
equivalent to a total equivalent shunt impedance of .
1 2 3 n
P/n P/nP/n P/n
21RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
• Instead of distributing the power from the amplifier, one might as well couple the cavities, such that the power automatically distributes, or have a cavity with many gaps (e.g. drift tube linac).
• Coupled cavity accelerating structure (side coupled)
• The phase relation between gaps is important!
22RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
A 3 GHz Side Coupled Structure to accelerate protons out of cyclotrons from 62 MeV to 200 MeV
Medical application:treatment of tumours.
Prototype of Module 1built at CERN (2000)
Collaboration CERN/INFN/Tera Foundation
23RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
This Picture made it to the title page of CERN Courier vol. 41 No. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2001)
24RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 25RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
synchronous
2p
w L/c
speed of light line,
w = b /c
p
p/2
pp/2 b L0
0
p/2
p
2p/3
26RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
1 cm
30 GHz structure (CLIC)
11.4 GHz structure (NLC)
27RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Dimensions in mm
28RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
¼ geometry shown
Input coupler
Output coupler
Travelling wave structure(CTF3 drive beam, 3 GHz)
shown: Re {Poynting vector} (power density)
29RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 30RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
-4.00
-2.00
0.000E+00
2.00
4.00
0.000E+00 0.500 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50
FRAME: 1 01/06/00 - 17:06:38 VERSION[V4.024] SICA32.DRD
SI: A+3,10,4, B-5,CELL-6,15
A: 1.700E+01 MM, B: 3.703E+01 MM.
FOR REF., E.J., JUNE 2000
X COMPONENT OF WAKE POTENTIAL IN V [INDIRECT CALC.]
OP-:4024
#1DGRAPH
ORDINATE: WAKETCOMPONENT: X
FIXED COORDINATES:DIM...........MESHLINE X 11 Y 1
ABSCISSA: GEOMWAKE[BASE OF WAKET]
REFERENCE COORDINATE: SVARY..........MESHLINEFROM 0 TO 2994
3 GHz SICA structure: Transverse wake suppression
s [m]
transverse wake for 3 cells.
offset 10 mm, 2.5 mms
W [V/pC]t
31RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
“T18” reached 105 MV/m!“HDS” – novel fabrication technique
32RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 33RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Different from DC, at RF the resistance is not exactly zero, but just very small. It is
The maximum accelerating gradient is normally limited by the maximum possible surface magnetic field (the “superheating field”, 180 mT for Nb, 400 mT for Nb3Tn).
Maximum acc. gradients are however obtained for Nb (ILC, ≈ 40 MV/m).
1.3 GHz
34RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
10.2 MV/ per cavity
35RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
25 -35 MV/m
36RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 37RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 38RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
All this was replaced by the RFQ …
39RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 40RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Minimum Energy of a DTL: 500 keV (low duty) - 5 MeV (high duty)At low energy / high current we need strong focalisationMagnetic focusing (proportional to b) is inefficient at low energy. Solution (Kapchinski, 70’s, first realised at LANL):
Electric quadrupole focusing + bunching + acceleration
41RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
The electrode modulation creates a longitudinal field component that creates the“bunches” and accelerates the beam.
42RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 43RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 44RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Typical ranges (commercially available)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 1000 10000f [MHz]
CW
/Ave
rag
e p
ow
er
[kW
]
Transistors
solid state (x32)
grid tubes
klystrons
IOT CCTWTs
45RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
MRF151G
46RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/e04/PAPERS/THPKF031.PDF
147 modules
DU1029UK
47RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
RS 1084 CJ (ex Siemens, now Thales),
< 30 MHz, 75 kW
YL1520 (ex Philips, now Richardson),
< 260 MHz, 25 kW
4CX250B
(Eimac/CPI),
< 500 MHz, 600 W
(Anode removed)
48RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
CERN Linac3: 100 MHz, 350 kW
CERN PS: 13-20 MHz, 30 kW
50 kW Driver: TH345, Final: RS 2054 SK
Driver: solid state 400 W, Final: RS 1084 CJSC
49RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
RF in RF out
CathodeCollector
z
t
velocity
modulationdrift
density
modulation
-V0
50RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
CERN CTF3 (LIL):
3 GHz, 45 MW,
4.5 ms, 50 Hz, h 45 %
CERN LHC:
400 MHz, 300 kW,
CW, h 62 %
51RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009 52RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
2
4
6
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
2
4
6
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
180
360
“SLED” outputpulse
Input phaseInput pulse
SLED: SLAC Energy Doubler LIPS: LEP Injector Power Saver
1 2
34
53RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
2.57961
0
Ci 1
6.94444 103.0 C
i 0
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
1
2
3
2.32804
0
Ci 1
6.94444 103.0 C
i 0
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
1
2
3179.999848
0
Ci 1
180
p
.
65004500 Ci 0
5000 60000
100
200
179.999848
0
Ci 1
180
p
.
C1i 1
180
p
.
65004500 Ci 0
5000 60000
100
2002.37117
0
Ci 1
6.94444 103.0 C
i 0
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
1
2
3
5.27181
0
Ci 1
6.94444 103.0 C
i 0
0 2000 4000 6000 80000
2
4
6
Standard “SLED”Pulse
RF phasemodulation
Flat pulse
Distorted pulseFlat pulse RF phasemodulation
-10 kHz
Old
New
54RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
BOC „Barrel Open Cavity“
55RF II24 February, 2009
CERN Accelerator School, Divonne 2009
Electric field, logarithmic scale
2.99848 GHz,S11: -12.9 dB
Magnetic field
56RF II24 February, 2009