C-H

MAR ?, 7 2008 1 ® $ -® 8® 8CntIRTRT^1H1^r,^a,

SnV f\ L1S CCNS-r /c^\r_L i Sec--;,fn c{,Ci.a

WTLL^IAM 1) ASC>^ C)S ^, . ) Cc^NST

C^ERAi 1^ T IAc'FR^ ^ (at/) C^^R-n 1 0 Cc.^n5-t g s -7-

6j6APR 28 2008

^ CLERKOFCOURTSUPREME COURT OF OHIO

1^c rrTZc^^1 t=o^ ti^^^T a= ^d^B^AS CaRpUS

I h^ S 4-z-^5}- , o^ (j, QCv y ahor coun--^ y

ss uC-_7R = F- z c -(_)VED

APR 14 2006CLERK OF COURT

i SUFnENiE COURT OF OHIOC^r^es ^ar^ ^h^ ^ ►

a ^^^^^i^e^,^,^ner h^re;n^der ^ ^,^vee^nlc^^

r

ar^^n h-e rerrL

^^^y^ tl,^ v^n^e ^-.Gle U^J^^^ s:A7^s(zg usc 1^4c^(i)^ ^a^ th^^c^l ^ow in

m;S ► ^a<-O,n

4z^^^^ S c1C-d-^'or^_

A L1 ^^q 9t- P^e ^^3- ^^-^-

7-1• S 7^^-^ S CjF I^ C I^ TzO^ E=^2

IT-t-tt ha--3 dn APos-d-Jle (40(7K-7-ol) qlc^m

S^^4e ^nler (3"-ner, r^2q,,:,^Inq lau3 LI ^^d- C^J- `^4-(^

a ^^Z zc; ^:

(^N-r-TlA) 'S'T<^%`rt.S <

s^7^.1TrE c^r-°

^cea4

z--o^,

oS 4^^^v^

w al)^ 3S

Tlh^ 1^^(XY)^sel^ ^ I I cin D. 6'U1 a 2n ^? cjsc^ cJLcY ; s Dv)

-aA--lavv a mtr^t, c4'

2-e^fJ an^ C 1C S^^^ C^

^a 4 NZ2

'U)rliy C^lt t^ (3\P. hia\/-C--PRAc-rJ-C^ LAN ." /-,n "1 3 an <.) G\, an4 a4e or ^f'e" `" ^

gc

arvI ^tJ v.z Co..:r-6 ^,1 I I a^^ S uv h c l^ a ti e ^„r-^ ^0 C jv^^n^ n ^ I aOc^

0

^^t^

A-5-^--:rTDWI e^ Tj rs-^37^4

bs ^L J ;,fl^-o / 44y v3 QIQ-CL^

y^na1^^ z^ ?,^-'u-yy ^ t^p-

Gn ^YJ U 1^ 4i .^^"e l c^v^ cS ^ 4j-^ C

CG^c^r ,^ c1r^-;ws ^^^. ^ , ^ ^d^3 -^^^;s c^"h^ ^

r ^ ^r s ary

^)

rs

n

d1t S^Ke^ ) t^ drs rs^a d-e ^ c^Fy ^"^ ^ vJ^^ ^ ^ c^c^

AS- s^36,

E>j,-e V-P,5I ,o c'6,n

c^c^ c^b^. ^tac^^ t^ 7^3 ^^m, ^-- ^^ sc^s c^^

Qre 1nz^P1;c^^le (7- a 0^),L1^ ^a ^^

f^177TF-yw-:t7 (n-- `Tiz,71A

^.^

Fc, eco^x z b

^# u^ I ^ ^t^^ ) atC]

C^o cy-, as Tc^r At°^L'6e ^C. L

>4-akfs G'+ 4T)e^°3,cQ.

C-)b,iz> i 3 Ct'1 ae-4--,C1e czd?Ce('- Jv SJ C 2I c^kk^i c2^ ^^'Car ^r1,S ^E,t^Zkj

^^rJ;c^s

1 r ) z° ^^ ^ --i'iSY)-ev- c-9 s S^ ^s t^ ^ v- ; q h ^ s ^,^ ^eGaev

<34 f aS

L § cy)D

;SSk^reJO 4--c> ;nqlj:^ i 1) ---^

n C, F -4j-e pe'^ -Prs fio c ne^` nc^

rh i4,ecD --Lo ^ e t^l ^a41{^^ Cc^1 k'S c E^ ^h Q^ ^^a'^1ZVl^r

Comrnoo C^) c4-`4 -A ^cr-y-D "^qq7 GG^ d- Q &Z-6wal

. p2wetT^v ^^i j^C^ coi ?r cx-\ ( 2,/9/G7' ` Vl _

C I \i/1 0 I ^ )r Vl ^ U ^ 0 O^^J - ^ r J 11 :. ' ^

dbk n-c) W6-v-r(M-L- ha r " s s,^e jo , n®prz-^,4,30,t^

:^^'h^'`^ ^^ Q4-' °x 31

\^ -.....;.

i h tr`' (cD n 4avc)f- aJ cT-ia,

M1^.Y 4-9- ^U^4J 'V' t 3i'--^]/.^.`i^. \uN^l"C. ^` "IV^'Ir^^IV^'I^ .^VY";"l^

-6- anc^ 75cs^ ^s"cl

IF-em;n, Qc.,u S ^,^-erx v-0, e'D i

ro-e,

+N-ere

4k'^y I,YY),delo

ec

^ ^tiVrac)^^^e 2 (^^^^'3J.

^1^ j^S a^© i^^GY1^c11^JV

ve- --J ^ P^b(^L^ ^ C^nnc^ ^e n2r^ e^J ^ s ^^^^ Pc`tScY1 ^^

G.r ^ny ^'S^ n c^ ^',^ ^d-e 6^ u^ ^;n

1 c^-nqvaq e o^ ^k-,- Sd^e, ^ns ^^,f,-,4e

W^ t ► y, Vtikc gan Ss4q4e *7DpW4QT44-Q 1 cz: s. 5--Z/ ra^ L . G c-p, ad u-^, c^g S C4,

a^^,(►^^^>^ -&&.^ (5

f'i ^'L. ^^i •LJ _ ...i ^lC. G:'.^l\'"i !C^^'C^°} ^^R^C^ -t:°•^.1^%ti'^ . `:.^^^ r'^ti

!LF'r p^.:s

c^ `c.:A-f7v .^ , f'^ {l 'c^ ^ r"}„ , ^--.

U c.V}<^) I}-Q'} -,37r}yC°r Sc^ }^3

c. h all -e^) '3

3 7 z

.i

Xt ^ e,^\xra'I"^^°^^ca}^r J;-lf-^o a .'-zsrz F2kaT^.N c^ .

•^^ o-q; ^-D

tJi^c^ al^n q w4h^vc-ra I a4kev- mhg-s- b,;^i

o4 '' Dv^CcDn

no4

rCh w ar-rcjn,:za;

haY--e nc)

(^ ^° `^P3 c 3 ^ S® ^r ^ ^' ^^ ^}`ca C^ ^

c^'1 li^/ i^c ^^'U^^r•41FO (^2

7Ffl,-4^> ., -t-^ 6c-"^} "'.:^ (^,s -a)R/ an J -^(^k a qe^?^ a^ e

4-L <5ny

801AUPr (-eq^SP3 ^S ^ C^JJY}a55?Z1j^r

c^tr.)So)

cl 4

^^/ ^ { e r S 4m C°

ay-)J-C c^wj (-Q " a 11 m^)^,-)(-D a1)6vi

w^ rV14L,

C) lv cy^.D F:^C^^n c^T- Cr;vavya I. Trcclp,-^^

<^)r Re4o-n c->-JL L^^t.(Yi`^vl- 4?'D

^! 4^-e :Dt-Fr-; c::W 74-c,

T

Ce^r4/ ynay YYWVe

-)l" tL-^" u'Y) .. -T^-e i'y7^^

w h-pre 4l-e7-e-c°e;ve Q

^C^C^Ja l ; aS^i e n F'C C'^ Sel rt^ ^cDee7CSQ d& YY? 11::-/ CD')-

^e ;1^eqa19^bi^

C ^.v"L cn^D

.. -..^..j..^^ . . rl (^

-- (\oY l

Ar^ 3Z <.,^^

Q^ -N,

^. `rlr^-, ^ ^- G

oJ 'E ^-Q Cc,(.) !-i- Cit'^ s

r- "

0 0,-3 Y4-- `-.. L q"4z-^C. E'i 4 R cn C;j(J,

vcr-^ nza^ -^'n, ^^Qr;n^ ^hf^ f

<^cp^!t).) 77C'c , n ^^^•C°(2

t n P:2 r! C-) 'r

2.

'-=^ u`^h,ch ^ ^ q t^-'v Q

nc^ C^ty rlcK)^k

C'a c^ b^ f

C7-T

;c - !-) c^

^'. ^La('.^'NYl 1)CSo CCXI

^DA iy-

X^:,v Z: 'i,SC--c

k i^ ^ j

^'^1^V^Yl

Sv) 0e^^c ce-

C^C),y, s4 .^^^,z,•, ^I^^ C^^ ^^ V)a Jor s^J c F^z^

63 r^9 ° ^ 31 r ^s^c.^^^ ^^ W)b^ ^

nc^, ;p;J^^!

^ c^N^L y S ^^1vN^ k -ere < a le x

G^c `FP ^ ^ c1C^C ^c^ JJn scD C^iC9i Ve'1uqC

Arn^^^Qer, +utjzv,aC1ecoEn4--)J Ia C^7iCV ^ V^^ ^^^i C!J da`^ C^

nz:^i'10 eYSess-eL) s/^lk-e ^

d^^ PCVC-Ov^Cs)

:5^1cJ<D jm d- Pv Wr,^ ^ ^KRV

Cr^r }^ C`^^'C g 1 6'1 U V7'J^2"^

r

oST, C'(^Wvr

O1 ^ L-e^D CnrJ S^ k-(z

^adernme3tt-

tha4- ;n ::L, very c a^qz

c^ C^Yl C^ c.{c^l^^3 ^vrE^^.^ c^^; Ga^3 ^l'e. C^cSY1^^^y

PUS,. y

^1/ Lil ^^va'^Prs , c^no f^c>^ ^cs ' ,n^^^rar2L^^r

1 ^^h^r t^rt C`^'rs^n^ ^he c^2^ec^ak,^ ^

r^n^o by ^^ v,s , Csns ^ ,t s^;an . %^r^ an^

c^(^ I^iUvs,Sdc^(^d^s 3 c^^,n^e^'s^ v-^'^^(ac"o^r^vul^^l^ Q:^ ^J.U

/,nf^B +z> -I -E.4--en h^ ) ^s 'ra, mers

I r m n^ ok'..o,alj d e -^^r-re h-ereb/ i^^t ^ na--t..^e

IIT

3

aOX (Dl^=^

-c^^2^unay ro<3^he ^11 ^KL^t o'f

e^I^^,a^ J^ h^/ Jc^^l^ ^C ^26^s c^c^ ^cklc^e dcF U^I'^

n^y^3 v^vr^^ c^^': C^)s ^^ V, o Ic^ ^^ a^ ^

, l ^S^" d^5^

-77 4 2 Fa^ ^a16

Qrt^9 c ecarX c c^JS C{;^^ecZC.2^

^^c l ^re cOL C^^^ ^uLe ^^k -e hJl^, ^^/,v1^

C4^^^

awo ^3; ^l ^^ c a 1 ^rr^^r Ly S'tZ^ P H//

' 1'e^ ^ tY^Q r^n ^ l.'^ ^^ ^ r^ th ^ C°c^m m^3tnc3 )

V^ vy

^ 57faT^ a ^ t^ a ^ o -Y)rre

d^d Jf Y1 F' D 47

c^ K w, L^-, P n U-en ^3j ,)^-^ c^^- 5a^ 1c^-^

^ct-^ ^ 1, ^ ^rtStYSY o71/, C^tc^ ^n,' Vv^ YJ ^

C6'^^C-^- to; ^^

S,zy ^2 Z^nrz^ ) w s- Gn Jo t^Ccr^^ c h^

c^ 'C'

S 7A7^ aT- e^A -J^^DesQ^9a^Ls c:bC> h^«

i-eprese)^^S) -ov) c,^^; Z4

^ ^h e c^vt vol)Z) ; 3^4 tlca l-awJ hc-).s

c'n elL^bc^o,4e ^^jL G6(s,os^- tl^ ^^^r^^1^0

-^ s('

C°L

Tlo kab,^I--e lzc"

VY^ ©n Co-& r e^c12JJ ^ 1

5ee ^^c^s ^ ^le ^ c 6hlc^ S(^e

`^12- I/e^/,^o -L^ °^/- L,^

C r5^ 4=-, 1:(-'I`D rl(-Ty A\^-&r4"-^ 9I I V 4 h /,-\ x , I -t-,r) ^- vn t=v, -A-

'Xf1, ka>^ ) 1F^f? -

^^ k1 Y^^ ^)(^ i l

No -JJ^^en w (;\S4-

1^e ( C3, ;^ ob;y-^11^U^-7hy

U

095110459

DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL

DIVISION 0€

95CC`13 i:.. ii

El. PI5' a:]' 1 L; '.

^Tlii€ AROui itre

ANDPUBLIC RECORDS

6744 969

J }feredy Certify tlrat t/re arrKexed copy(or caclr of tlre aHrrexed copies) is a truecopy of a record iir tlre legal custodd of .tl^e State 4rclrivist of L'olorado, arrd isfiled aurohg tlre records ofCDLDNADG TERRITORY LEGISLATIYE ASSEMBLY. TERRITORY OF CDLDRADD

deposited therein

GENERAL LAWS. JOINT RESOLUTIONS. lffMORIALS, ANDPRIYATE ACTS,PASSED AT TNEFIRST SESSION OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, DENVER. CDLDRAfq TERRITDRY,

SEPTEMBER 9. 1861.

TS7LE PAGE. PAGES 20, 21. 2[SIC], AND 35.TOTAL 5 PAGES.

DCTDBER4, 1995D111[

5-

poo51 °O_^ N N

:E^U D. 'Y n - m O

WwAO UWmmC^ W U ()^.

C¢N&uL LA fi5. JOuGENERAL LA^S, JOIFT RESOLUTIONS, HEtIORIAL'

dND 1'121\"A'1I< A,G^.

q f 1^..- - l•VI'ASNif7)•.A'f T11F. FII:.1' `I;>SI11\

r :T

LliGTSl,<^F'11'^;- .1SST1iBLl^

TERI3ITORY OF COLORADO,

IIFSVEH, t'OLOItAUO 7T:IC.. ^EI'f. :Itl,. IBUI.

SOCttuBY O'ITu

T9E DkxLAYA770S UF IRDLI'G\DESCE,

THE CONSTITUTION OF TdE UNITED STATES,

ORGANIC 1GT OF THE TERRITORY.

YUBLIBHED BY AUTHOR]Tl'.

DENCER:SY06. OSBBCB, OOIqYDO 1BPGB WCIY. 1?9 pILLO ORlOB-

IB61

iMw naCf

6744 970

2 AMEnnME\TF TO THE CUCSrtTt'TIO\•

the r.eal of gnveniment of titc i:ultal States, directodrn do.. I'rc'ident ultbe Nrnun•: Ihu I'rceidetM1 ut• the',enate ah+ll, in the pn•.a•u+v ot' the fenute sud liouuor Itcprecentative.+. ^l.en all the terti5¢aten, end tLe'ntcs ahall thcu be .wnuted; tbe lkrenu having 16eI,mnltnt nuntber n° vmr+ for 1'nKident, ahalt he theI'n•Fidrnl, ir m o numbcr lm m malnrity or the vhotcm::nln•r uf viert,rt: uj.lwinlcd: :wJ if no persou luveewb mujurih-. tben fnnqthe p•nons baring thehighntnuml.rr^ uo: eznadiup Ihrtt.on tbe liat uf IblaeentedIbra+ 1'nxident, the Ifnuu• ntltv+re+ontatiara ehnll

- cluvtse ininwdiatelv, h.billot, the ^'msidtnt ltut in. imnciugtl:el'reeiaeide.nrea=6nll lr.•takenhy8iatn,

thc reprexcntntion frv,lh

m roeh %tatc Lating nne entu; •yunnmt for this 1 ur1 a• .lmll ,.msirt nt' u rncndwr or

.nmudn•ra 5rmt Ior,-11,irds of t1m: nacs. ond a m JuritYof all thc Ntutrs Aarll br• nnrs>arc in . ebnire. Andif the 1{uu:ar uf Ite•mw•ulaiivc. cball nnt chonac e1'rcaidcnt avbenaacr llte nAt nf ,•l:eim sL•all doralwulun Ihom. Lef,m- ilm 16arlh daa ,,:' :I:v,•h tidlutriny„Ih!•n the Yice 1'r.videirt .h. il ::vt ::+ 1'm,ident, as mthe easo of thv dcath or nth+t runsll:ainnul d'u-ahilityof the Prasident

•Vn•n..r.a- 2 ThctrrumlmcingtheFrcnttxtlmminr of rotaoV-tce I rcfideut, sb:dl I.v 1"ire 1'n+idcnt, if sucbnumhcr lw•. mnjnivty +•f t!tv n'I+d= w:mhcr of elcelorAa1,poitnetl; and if un ptreon Luce a ec:!;:n'ih', then fron,tbe tn-o hi,•a¢n{ ;.^::J,a:x in tbe lie:. the.lenutu xtullcboosc thoS'icc 1'nai,!:•ur. u eu:.rnw for thc purpoeeshall consist of 1a'o:binia c: tlrr n'l;ule nnmber ofSenaton, end a majoriteofthc vbolc umnber rhull

-be uteeamn' Qo o-elmicc.8 But uo lKrsou ronelimtiorulk ineligible to the

' offtro of rresidn:t, dndl 1n+ eligildc tn that of Viesrnt;dnnt?r lbc rnited Slates.

., .. . ARTICLE Yln

^,^" IfanyciGunnftbeC'nit<dStsinehdlsaxpt,e6im,rtaiee or retaln any title otnobility or hoaor, or shall,

v+• wirhout the ennsent of Oongnaq aocept end retain w7. .' pr•ecent, peaeion, n&tt or.emolument of saS lind

whetea-er; from nn;• empeaur, ►9ug, prince, or 2rergop p such perauu eludl eeaee to be s cltiseu of theII Stata wid e1W1 be iuealable of holding anyotllee of trurt or pradt rutder them, or either of faem.

[27ort-The 11th article of the amendments to theCooctitntiou wna propnerd at the secoud weion of thethfrd i.ougreee; the 141h article, at the fust wsion ofthe eighth Coagr^+s ; aud the 18th articl4 yt the see.Aud seenoo of (Le eleventh Congre4:.]

laKfal f^8 t1.0 flerk.Imtil the ( Iluxiuc

v ,n-^ n'rl^,rk iu tliua'iul i.,r x:nJ clerkf a e :,il ee ,e otr .xdm in

J f'. I E. 1I .1^.-ontinul•J .:n'r nntl!;rll iurore, xlmcs.e<ndrr a:c sanie nLti-mn such adp.nrncd- d:rv fiixtmppniuted.aoll br iu fun:v 1'rom

Z^quors tn c'oJdicr+.

sc qi Ifiyrw.^:bGn.r

Ii,l! .vll, escluw_r.olaiic:are+orr.lnr

tntca.rrrin,.aaiii'J

, nit.d Fnr.ca arlincettmcr,t, a nch Por-t.• district trouriurt of tlia Terrinlr•:'rironcll fur a pvri. L Iull IJrGIt nmlpa.ncho:,L: a . , loli:m .:f .:rLer<„n

n" i I a urrio. lmq p:,. tbr tii: u-rn, Ilet ,.r,e•iin_

I

A:e ACTTo orgenizo the Tlilitia.

^een nurl.'rc'i int.. 31 '1 f,i i k

i t

aaxaaes e.ewa.•';be?n ned4:ror tbo ¢+old .oa of the frr^t eection of ri,h r-^"^^•^:.r..eat,eanqte6lioLb9' ^^d^^ tentwlmeaeatL^•:

„+.,o.. J^ ,m

•epiritvoae liqnon a, wioe wer& otAoirted (rom Lim d,-.^itbilll„µI ^191dter wbn }4daoc,wrm at the tilue ofobbin!n w r,ipbitlonltqaorooC^rine,thc unlform:orutboy^rlvld:.. dmem^a^e : bm frum a nei'I:tr..aqdt^utltq aVLe+Wweahplroxn tubc>ealdier-'+a. P^WI rLWy?plataMl e„'y.net sL1 ao. be liobi;,:^or R WIt,^4ttc°_Sed in tl,ie aet

;..ThrriN,eba!ltakoeflectmd'6einforcefromIpqejgwl:er '

Pp+^Q?t? •d,;BoPtamLS.8th.38GY.. ...$A'1u,P, i4i,;..;•.da.>i: . . .

°=iS..._ _ . .. . ^^. - . .

^ :.:PS^:• -AdoptiogtheCotnmenl,awofRnglend.'n"A& (fomrkdby fhe'Cb1me12 mull(vire qrRrpretmGrh'ru

"!'f'9ect^ro.dco1. T^bat the Common Law of Ecglaud, so r.•:;'`far ea tbe Eame in epplirbblc and; of a gcncrsl nature.

andelloc'a and tLtetee of tLe Britisb parllement,

•^ p?priorto}hefomtLjearoE3amea thef5rste

, esccot4( r ,:K.ma^ag tba eecoLd enctionof tbc sirtu rhnptcr cF forty-Wlr^lSlwbMh, tbo eigby cbepter of 4hineenth Eliza6cth,r^dvinth eluptar.of lbirty.eeventb I{cnr}• Bigbtll,) audnhieh ero of n geoetal noture, and not iocnl •u tAot

•^$w8dom, ebnllLo the rcle of dceiainn, and ehall b.r'rtountlercdneof fuYfonxunNf rcpeuled Ly legislanrc

'entLoti ty8+v 2. Thie ^et ebell bo in forcc from and ufter ite

APDrored, CebobSr 31ti:, 1861

mrte'i y t Cbun,d and flm:.er of Hr}+e;nltanrrstJ :.ifnra (J Trrr.ronj:

61eryable bodiei â male cit•zvn of Colo n*-• r.,^•.radu vicel. l c ao¢,r of eisllteen md fm<y-ure)uh, ` •'s::pt tlm.c trhn nrc.by t^ieact exem [ thcrefromEI18II, LC nll L1.•CL Jllll f:ablC to perfare, :u ).itary Jutv a.

u^.[°a•, ' seldirr,n: ul•hrcl tLC coneEitutionauu inxaaih'..- c; itii^:r^ltl^•: ' i-•uiied ^Lltes oud tkc Qrgauic Act :u;llalre oC tliia

. 14•ir iilr lij,p^.l, ^:,:•.• •. ., s 2'drritvn, a:v,^Niuq W tLc tenna snd 4rzvrisions uf thiaf: ^.m v:nupl:'unt Lv• ^. ^cG ^:1iiJ eceqeitizn: abovo foriy-bre ycars of oye

[aYrr GA6E6744 974

EIGTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALSCUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

ANTHONY L. JERDINEA natural free-bom AmericanInhabitant, Sui Juris, De SoliJure Divino synonymous with"the people"

vs.

SPECIAL VISITATIONEstablishing Sua SponteOriginal Jurisdiction of thisCourt over the below namedDocument;under the venue and Jurisdictionof the American Flag of PeaceRule 81 (a) (2) ! FRE 201 (d)

The Executive members, United States Constitution Art. III, for The State of Ohio in Ohio RepublicCommon Pleas Court Cause Number CR-07-502844-A; and private Adininistrative Claim Number:64257VWDM Republic in the Cuyahoga County, located in the city of Cleveland.

Defendant/Respondents

PETITION FOR REDRESS IN THE NATURE OF QUO `'VARI2ANT TO [28 U.S.C. § 16511QUO WARRANTO TO THE BENCH / FRE 201 (d)

To any and all Executive members holding or purporting to hold office for The State of Ohio in OhioRepnblic, Cuyahoga county, located at the city of Cleveland from the Eighth District Court of Appeals inOhio Republic, Cuyahoga county, located at the city of Cleveland.

The State of Ohio in Ohio Republic, and place on record.

Ohio Republic )united States of America ) ss: Common LawCuyahoga county )

Anthony-Lewis: Jerdine, hereafter "Demandant," without the Legislative venue and jurisdictionof the United States, UNTfED STATES, STATE OF OHIO, and any STATE(s) of, sojouming within theCountry of Ohio and its Republic Form of Government, being first swom accordingly in law, having firsthand knowledge of the facts herein below, being of the age to contract and competent to witness, declareand affirm the following as true, correct, certain, complete, and not misleading, to the best ofDemandant's personal knowledge and belief, and to the penalty of peijury as articulated to in the Laws ofthe United States of America [Title 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1)].

Ref: cr-07-502844=A

bfnyey

^hcf L

j ya1

Writ of Quo Warranto The several united States of America'age t of 3

This Petition for Redress in the nature of a QUO WARRANTO is a Common-Law

Constitutional Entity and operates in accordance with the following:

On December 6th, 1865, the Supreme Court of the United States of America conceded theratification of the 13th Original Article in the Amendment to the TJnited States Constitution.

Proposed in the year 1810, (2 U.S. Statutes at Large 613), it was recently discovered to have beenproperly ratified under the United States Constitution, Article V. The necessary number to achieveratification was obtained when Virginia ratified the Article and promulgates its ratification in the Laws of

many States as part of the Constitution.

The issue has been brought before the Supreme Court, and the Court conceded the ratification ina 6-3 vote. It was in effect from the day of its ratification on March 12th, 1819, not from the time when

the Supreme Court recognized it.

Therulingwaspromulgatedin(citeomitted). The 13th Original Article inAmendmenttotheUnited States Constitution reads as follows and declares without equivocation:

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility, orhonor, or without the consent of congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or eniolument ofany kind whatsoever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or Foreign Power, such person shall cease to be acitizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them or

either.of them."

An "Honor" is an advantage or special privilege...A license granted to some, but not generallypossessed by others, giving some unequal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power.

This "Honor" is void through the "Supremacy Clause", Maryland v. Louisiana, 451 U.S. 725, 746(1981), 101 S.Ct. 2114, 2129, 2129, U.S. Supreme Court, "All Laws which are repugnant to theconstitution are null. and void", Marybury v. Madson, 5 U.S. 137, (1803).

T'heir. citizenship is void; they are foreign powers whose lawful status in Ohio Republic is that ofaliens, (Title 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)). They possess no immunities for any purpose, nor protection from anysource, and any alleged Judgment(s) or Order(s) from these foreign powers have no standing in Law, theyare void from the beginning and confer no power to enforce.

Only Ohio State BAR members have the PRIVILEGE to "PRACTICE LAW."

FURTHER SAYETH DEMANDANT NOT

Notice: You are hereby Comtnanded by Writ of Right, Quo Warranto, to. provide thefollowing information in CERTIFIED COPY form, for the record and to the Demandant:

1. By what authority the Executive members for The State of Ohio in Ohio Republic, in Cuyahogacounty, located in the city of Cleveland purport to hold Demandant in restraint, deprived of Life,Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, and:

2. By what authority the Executive members for The State of Ohio in Ohio Republic, in Cuyahogacounty, located at the city of Cleveland, exercise any alleged power of authority, and:

Writ of Quo Warranto The several united States of America

Page 2 of 3

3. By what legal process of Law, Executive members for the State of Ohio in Ohio Republic inCuyahoga county, located at the city of Cleveland, exercise any alleged power of authority, and:

4. Where is the location of, and who is the keeper, or record in which the Judge(s) of Courts ofrecord for The State of Ohio in the Ohio Republic in Cuyahoga county, located at the judicialBranch of Government by Electors in compliance to the "Separation of Powers" Doctrine, and:

5. When the Attorney General for The State of Ohio in the Ohio Republic in Franklin county,located at the city of Columbus, current membership to the State Bar Association became active

and his/her State BAR Number, and:

6. Each Executive member(s) for the State of Ohio in the Ohio Republic in Cuyahoga county,located at the city o f C Ieveland, " Oath o f O ffice", B ond C ertificate", total a mount o f B ondedFunds and Mailiug location where the Bonded Funds are currently being held.

Subscribed and affirmed by the voluntary act of My own hand, in the county of Cuyahoga, within Ohio

republic on this 2^_day of the F^st 1 Vt ^) month, in the year of our Lord, 2008.

`Antliony-Lewis: JerdineA natural free-borrt American Inha{^itaritSui Juris, De Jure Soli, Jure Divino

DateConvention De La Ha`ye due 5 Octobre 1961

Presented by:of Ohio, at Cuyahoga, in Ohio Republic; for the issuance to the Court of Common Pleas for The State of:---.Ohio in Ohio Republic, in Cuyahoga county, located at the City of Cleveland. <,

_•-_. A, ^ -

to the Righth District Court of Auueals

This Document to which this certificate is affixed isCERTIFIED

A TRUE, CORRECT, and COMPLETE COPY of theOriginal

Claimant is holder in due course of original

Writ of Quo Warranto The several united States of funerica

Page 3 of 3

E & 40CATIp^ (j

iA(t]'t,"'AATE _

C^liff^'.$•?, Rd{^81^6f.19 M.t>; ^ = .

iN^MTORY<SHEET:

ARDRESS'.;

,., .,^. ,.. : . .TYP.E & YNARRANT EEXECdJT^Q ^& ^, >.., .. .,. 1 s. ,

Sk

^WR^,

ARQRE$01'fYPE'OF VvARFi^NT. ^Eks;^aA.^ t^a^2+^^ G EC.UTED

PINDER

."„^ ^-7^T d^l^rTa3X^ ^uv^,^^ :'^3 ^ ..^9a.4,^ rn^ ;r^'"^,►'t ^`^r^ ^ a `'

-^n ^ ^, P,(4kL)nl/ -^^ ^

^-^--- -I-. l

JS 44 ^ ^ A ^' S`'--(Rev.3/99) CIVIL COVER SHEE T

JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as requiredby law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United Slates in September 19748is ieped for the usetf the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) 'C^^j t/ A

.(a) PLAINTIFFS

N4h c4lx - Lc-v ; 5(b) COUNIY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST USTED PtAiNTIFF ^V ^} L1

(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)I

W 4a,-^ `D,COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST USTED EFENDIWT

(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)NTTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE

TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

(c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)

^n^lY^r)a ^s^ "\1^^ aV '^ w1^^o ^-U? ^9 TItxTs

BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PUCEAN•xINONEeoxONLY) 1 1 I, CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (PLACEAN•x•iNONEBOxFORPUINnFF(For Diversit Cases Onl fy y

PTF DEFU.S. Government

PlainHffa Federal Question

,(U.S, Government Not a Party)

^ /

Citizen of This StateC~T I_ f„'iTl-1l

r l r ' ' f

'V71^ q 1

U.S. GovemmentDefendant

q(4 Diversity/ ` (Indicate Citizenship of Padies

CYizendY oY of Ali Another q 2 q 2

in ttem III)Cilizen or Subject of a 0 3 L'^a^'

Foreign Country Jc

NATUREOF SUIT (PLACEAN X" iN ONE 8OX ONL1)

AND ONE BOX FOR DEFENDANT)

PTF DEFIncorporated or Principal Place O 4 q 4

of BusinessIn This State

Incorporated and Principal Place q 5 q 5ofBusiness In Another State

Foreign Nation q 6,-- q 8

CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHERSTATUTES

10 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY q 610 Agdculture q 422 Appeal28 USC 158 q 400 Sbte Reapportionment20 Madne q 310 Airplane q 362 Personal Injury- q 620 Other Food & Drug q 41U Anfihusl36 MifierAcr q 315 Airplarie Product Med. MalpracTCe

'D 625 Dnrg Related Seizure q 423 Withdrawal q 430 Banla and Banking

IUNegoOableinclnunenl50Recover ofOver a d

Uabflrry . q 365PersonalInjury-l& ProduclUabiliy320Assauh lib

ofProperty.21USCeB1630U L

2eUSC157 q 450Conanercrr/ICCRafes/e1c0 ap ymery

& Fnlorcement oI JudgmeM,q e

Slander q 368 Asbestos PersonalLj qunr awaq 640 R.R. & Truck PROPERTY RIGHTS

q 46 DepodaG nq 470 RacNelaerhdlu¢nced and

itMedicxvaAq q 330FederalEmployers' Injury ProdudUablliy q 650NdineHegs. ComiptOrganrza6ons2 Recovery oI Delaulted Uabiaty q 66D Occupetional

q B2u CDpydghtsq 810 Selective5ervica

StutlenlLoans ne PERSONAL PROPERTYq 340 Mad /HSafe ealthtY q 830 Patentq 850 Sear{Bes/Cmnmudilies)(^M, ^e^)

q 345 Marina Product q 3r0 Other FraUtl q 690 Other q 840 Trademark ENdwve --a Recove of Over a q Uability 371 T lh I dinL lry p ymer

of Vefemn'sBenefitaq ru n en g

q 35B MotorYehicle q 366 Other Personat LABOR SOCIAL SECURITYq 875 Customer Cta lerge

12 USC 34100 Stockholders Sults q 355 MotorVehitle ProperyDamage - q 691 AgrinYlvxlACts0 Other Conlract Product Uabiliry q 385 Propedy Damage q 710 Fair labpr Stendards q 861 HIA (1395ft) . q 892 Economic Stabilization ACr5 Contract Produq 1Jabllity q 360 OllierPersonal Inlury Pretluct Debilit3' Ad

q 720 labor/Mgmt Rela5onaq 862 Black Lung (923)q 863 DM)C/DIWW (405(g))

q 893 Envuorcnental Maners•

REALPROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS.

q ee4 SSIDTmexwq eg4 Energg AllowSbnACtq 695 Freedomd

D LandCondemnafion 0441 Vo6ng q

510 Mofionslo Varato q nD lebor}Mgmt. Reporting& Di l A

q 665 RSI (405(g)) Infomla6onAct

'clsc osure q 900AppealolFeeDel2rminetionJ Forecloture q 442EmploymeM Sentenee

q 740RailxayLaSOrAct FEDERALTAXSU S UnderEiBralAccessloJustire)Ren[LeaseBFjectmeM q 443Housing( BA9EASCORPUS; IT) TorLs tp Lend Accpmmodallons q sso General q 950 Con66N8onaliryof

i Tort Producq Uability q 4q4 Wellare q 5^ DeaN Penalry q 790 Olher Imbor Utigation q 070 Ta<es N 5. PlaintiflSfateStalules

m1 All Cnher Real Prope q , g440 Other Civil Ri hls

q 540 Mandamus8 Otherq 550 Civil Rights q 791 Empl. Pet. lec.

or Defentlanl) q 880 OOler SlaMOry Adions. .

q 555 Prison Cooditlon Sewdty Act p Wt IRS -Third Parry26 USC 7609

tRIGIN (PLACE AN "X" IN ONE BOX ONLYJ

al _M Removed from o 3 Rernanded fromTransferred from

q 4 Reinstated or q s another district q e Multidistrictding *State Court Appellate Court Reopened (specify) Litigation

AUSE OFACTION (CITETHEU.S.CIVILSTATUTEUNDERWHICHYOUAREFILINGANDWRITEBRIEFSTATEMENTOFCAUSE.

Appeal to DistrictJudge from

q 7 MagistrateJudgment

DO NOTCITEJURISDICTIONALSTATUTES UNLESS DWERSITY)4I e ' S

Y

^ ('^ ^ao\

^ ^^e a^6 ^Sc ^^1331, ^^33 ►,^I-^

i

^ JREQUESTED IN . CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTIONCOMPLAINT: q UNDER F.R.C.P.23

RELATED CASE(S) (See instructions):IF ANY JUDGE

FFICE USE ONLY

SIGNATUREOFATTORNEYOFRECORD

CHE6K YES only if dem

JURY DEMAND:

DOCKET NUMBER

q YES q NO

IT # AMOUNT APPIYINr: IFP 11IrN:L

In the United States District Courtfor the Northern District of Ohio - Cleveland Division

Libel of Review

Anthony Lewis

V.

William D. Mason

} common law counterclaim in admiralty -} - notice lis pendens and -} verified statement of right -}} Re: God-given unalienable rights in the} original estate - Article III; Constitution}} ^;^Ie Io M seellan^^,s^eKe^

Comes now Anthony Lewis of the Jerdine family making a special visitation by absolute

ministerial right to the district court, "restricted appearance" under Rule E(8). William D. Mason has

been making false claims and this counterclaim and notice lis pendens are now in the "original exclusive

cognizance" of the United States through the district court - see the First Judiciary Act of September 24,

1789, Chapter 20, page 77.

Jurisdiction: In international law and according to the law of the land, agents of a foreign

principal are required to file any pretended claim in the appropriate district court prior to exercising

rights to that claim. The district courts have "exclusive original cognizance" of all inland seizures and

this includes vessels in rem (Rule C(3)) such as trust organizations and legal names (William D. Mason,

Henry M. Paulson, Jr., etc)

"...the United States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving to suitors, in

all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also

have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789;

Chapter 20, page 77. The Constitution of the United States ofAmerica, Revised and Annotated - Analysis

and lnterpretation - 1982; Article 111, §2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S. Government Printing Office

document 99-16, p. 741.

This fact of protocol - filing a claim in district court according to international law - is beyond dispute

and extends into antiquity: "Meanwhile those who seized wreck ashore without a grant from the Crown

did so at their peril." Select Pleas in the Court ofAdmiralry, Volume II, A.D. 1547-1602; Introduction -

Proliibitions, Note as to the early Law of Wreck, Selden Society, p. xl, 1897. Even the IRS recognizes

the protocol:

"Place for filing notice; form. Place for filing. The notice referred to in subsection (a) shall be filed

-- with the clerk of the district court. In the office of the clerk of the United States district court for thejudicial district in which the property subject to the lien is situated..." Title 26 U.S.C. §6323.

William D. Mason, acting as: "Prosecuting Attorney - Esquire" city of Washington, District of

Columbia, is an agents of a foreign principal, a "foreign state" defined at Title 28 of the United States

Codes § 1603, and Title 22 U.S.C. §611 the Division of Enforcement for the Department of Revenue

(for example C.R.S. §24-1-117 [Colorado]) under principal State Governor in convention with METRO

organization a.k.a. Public Administrative Services Headquarters (PASHQ - signed for example by

Edwin C. Johnson by John T. Bartlett; The Public Papers and Addresses ofTranklin D. Roosevelt, The

Year of Crisis 1933 Random House p. 21.) The Department of Revenue of course being the execution of

bankruptcy proceedings against the citizens of the United States since 1933 currently formed

"hiternational Monetary Fund" and "World Bank" etc. - the State, City METRO municipal and police

powers under United Nations charter law - protected by the same alleged positive law jural society

(international treaty) exemptions home rule (of for example, Article VI and Article XX of the State of

Colorado Constitution, "Transfer of government.")

The district court for the Northern District of Ohio - Cleveland Division has acquired exclusive

original cognizance of this counterclaim for the State of Ohio because this is a federal question - a

Constitutional matter involving a man on the land complaining about kidnap, incarceration and tlreft -

Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 661 and 1201 respectively, and irregular extradition from the asylum state into the

United States custody, treason - Constitution, Article III §3 and Title 18 U.S.C. §2381 by agents of a

foreign principal, creating diversity of citizenship - Title 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1333 respectively. T'he

court presentment (notification) is arbitrary and capricious clearly implying that Anthony Lewis, a man,

failed to comply with the alleged terms of a contractual agreement that he is not a party to, and as a

result, is being threatened with "law enforcement" actions by way of incarceration and inland seizure of

his private property. Speaking historically, the districts, formed in 1790 for handling the financial

obligations of the United States could not come into existence until after formal expression of remedy in

the'saving to suitors' clause (1789) quoted above and codified at Title 28 U.S.C. § 1333. The law is

paraphrased in the Internal Revenue Codes:

"Form. The form and content of the notice referred to in subsection (a) shall be prescribed by the Secretary.Such notice shall be valid notwithstanding any other provision of law regarding the form or content of anotice of lien." Title 26 U.S.C. §6323(F)(3). emphasis added

The only excuse for the discretionary authority granted administrative agencies is the judicial oversight

demonstrated in this invocation of an Article III court.

Law of the flag: Man is created in the image of God and to reduce a man to chattel against the national

debt is an affront to God. Exodus 13:16 and Genesis 1:27.

Cause Of Action

Anthony Lewis sojourning on Ohio state land, wlio's Corpus was seized, detained and held

for ransom by the UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, without venue and exclusive jurisdiction. of

the UNITED STATES, under color of law and office, on the 19'h day of December, A.D. 2007. The arresting

OFFICERS of the UNITED STATES MARSI-IAL SERVICE seized Anthony Lewis without identifying

themselves, and stating the nature and cause of the seizure. The arresting OFFICER(s) of the UNITED

STATES MARSIIAL, SERVICE neglected, or refused to take Anthony Lewis directly before a Judge or

Magistrate for determination of the lawfulness of said search warrant. ALL PERSONS involved

neglected to take Anthony Lewis directly before a Judge or Magistrate for the detennination of the

lawfulness of said searcli warrant. ALL PERSONS involved in the imprisonment of Anthony Lewis

neglected to properly issue any of the Miranda Wamings to him and the other inhabitants residing at said

property. No valid affidavit of probable cause was issued for the arrest and seizure of Anthony Lewis, nor

the visitors of said property. No verified complaint has been filed against Anthony Lewis by any injured

parties. No verified complaint has been filed by a holder-in-due-course of any contract requiring specific

perfonnance, bearing Anthony Lewis' name and Bona Fide signature. No verified complaint has been filed

by a holder-in-due-course of any contract requirimg specific perfonnance, bearing Anthony Lewis' name and

Bona Fide signature. The arresting officer(s) of the UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, by anned

force, removed Anthony Lewis and his visitors from the venue of Common Law, extradited them to the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT VENUE, without an extradition warrant stating the nature and

cause of the extradition. Anthony Lewis and visitors were concealed at the COUNTY JAIL, warehoused

under the fictitious name ASSAULTED and issued warehouse tracking number(s). NO GRAND JURY

has been convened to investigate the validity of any alleged complaint, in any court, regarding Anthony

Lewis. No presentment or indictment by a Grand Jury has been presented or filed in any court, neither

FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY or CITY, regarding Anthony Lewis. No LAWFUL summons or arrest

warrant was issued for the arrest and seizure of Anthony Lewis' Corpus. No LAWFUL search and seizure

warrant was issued for Anthony Lewis' personal property. Anthony Lewis of the Jerdine family, as an

inhabitant on Ohio state land, was never served any of the legally required process, nor did Anthony Lewis

at any time waive any immunity of the private /Corporate process of the corporation "CUYAHOGA

COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT" as provided at Pub. L. 94-583. Anthony Lewis was not served

in the proper style of process, on the charging (information), that style being, in the name and by authority

of "The State of Ohio". AnthonyLewishas not been charged with a crime, whereas STATE OF OHIO

"Charged" the ENS LEGIS Debtor: ANTHONY LEWIS JERDINE. None of the persons involved ever

established jurisdiction over the man Anthony Lewis on the record, neither CITY, COUNTY, STATE or

FEDERAL. Anthony Lewis has never surrendered, or waived ANY rights as:one of the People, in any court,

nor in any manner. STATE OF OHIO et al, must produce a contract bearing Anthony Lewis' name and bona

fide signature, with any injured parties name(s) and signature(s) affixed where Anthony Lewis.gave them

permission and license in commerce for seizure, arrest, and imprisonment of his body under color of law

whereas, Anthony Lewis has been without the jurisdiction of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA andJor

STATE OF OI-IIO. Anthony Lewis of the Jerdiiie family is an Inhabitant on Ohio state land, a

beneficiary of original jurisdiction for The united States of America, A.D. 1789 as amended A.D. 1791.

The "Inhabitant" has never waived any imprescriptable or unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and/or

Property, as Secured, Guaranteed and Protected by the Constitution for "The State of Ohio" and the

Constitution for The united States of America, and, ultimately, God Almighty. The named defendant in

William D. Mason's original action appears to be the ENS LEGIS Debtor in the UCC-1 Registered:at the ..

State of Georgia, Department of Licensing UCC Division File #.10852005516, and State the of Kentucky

UCC File# 2007-2271963-59.01, and #2007-2284268-01.01. The ENS LEGIS Debtor, a transmitting utility,

including all its property has been accepted for value, and is exempt from levy. The secured party has no

knowledge of a superior claim by any person over the named defendant in William D. Mason's original

action. All known charges against the named defendant in William D. Mason's original action have been

accepted for value.

William D. Mason filed a criminal complaint in the CUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMON _

PLEAS COURT, alleging four (4) violations of an OHIO REVISED CODE agreement against Anthony

Lewis, a man. This presumption is erroneous and is based upon the assumption that Anthony Lewis, a

man, is a U.S. Person, and therefore, a party mandated to en.ter into and obey an OHIO REVISED. .

CODE agreement. William D. Mason's original action does not set forth a cointroversy. William D.

Mason's original action does not contain any evidence establishing Anthony Lewis as having a signature

on any instruments upon which Anthony Lewis has any legal or equitable duty with respect to William

D. Mason or an OHIO REVISED CODE agreement. William D. Mason's original action doos not

contain any direct evidence admissible under the OHIO RULES OF EVIDENCE by the STATE OF .

OHIO, by affidavit, under penalty of perrjury, sworn to be true, correct, and not misleading, establishing

Anthony Lewis as having bona-fide signatures on any instruments which would make Anthony Lewis

liable to William D. Mason or an OHIO REVISED CODE agreement for any specific performance as

set forth in his original action. William D. Mason's original action does not establish whether Anthony

Lewis' prejudice is civil/equity or criminal/equity. Neither does it establish whether or not Anthony

Lewis' prejudice is infamous. Additionally, William D. Mason's original action against Anthony Lewis

does not reveal whether it was initiated by indictment or presentment of the Grand Jury. Moreover,

William D. Mason's original action does not reveal the constitutional authority upon which he is

proceeding to deny Aiithony Lewis, a man, the protected right of not being held to answer an infatnous

crime without an indictment or presentment by the Grand Jury. The law averred in William D. Mason's

original action against Anthony Lewis is located in the OHIO REVISED CODE, which the OHIO

STATE LEGISLATURE intended to be applied in liniited fashion upon a class specifically called

"Persons." William D. Mason's.original action against Anthony Lewis, does not cite the specific OHIO

REVISED CODE in which the OHIO STATE LEGISLATURE included natural born men and women

whom are inhabitants on Ohio state land in the specific LEGISLATIVE STATUTORY definitions of the

class known as "Persons." Furthermore, William D. Mason's original action does not reveal the identity

of the alleged damaged party, nor does it reveal the substance which the alleged damaged party had at

risk. Consequently,. Williani. D. Mason's original action does not disclose his right of action or cause of

action. Therefore, Anthony Lewis is entitled to be discharged from William D. Mason's original action

due to his failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted (Rule 12 (b)(6)). Regarding the

payment of alleged fines require.d by the presumed OHIO REVISED CODE agreement, it should also be

noted, that Anthony Lewis is nof a willing endorser of the private credit system of the Federal Reserve,

which was never offered in good faith. STATE OF OMO violated Art.1, Section 10, of the Constitution

for The united States of America as amended A.D. 1791. Legal tender (Federal Reserve) Notes are not good

and lawful money of the United States pursuant to Rains v. State, 226 S.W. 189 Pursuant to IRS Code

Section 1.1001-1 (4657)C.C.H.:Federal Reserve Notes are valueless. The subjection to Special Drawing

Rights (Paper Gold) is one thing but presuming endorsement of fractional lending practiced outside the.

scope of lawfut,money is unlawful an.d such presumption is defeated by law herein, nunc pro tunc. See

Title 12 U.S.C. § 411; Anthony Lewis is and always would have exercised his right to handle lawful

money had the option ever been presented in good faith. The "secret" indictment utilized for the claim

was irregular pursuant to "do process of law," as a result, Anthony Lewis wishes to invoke judicial

review, "and any other provision of law" to nullify any supposed justification for any further such

incarceration/detention/theft action - manifest in actual or threatened

kidnap/incarceration/detention/theft. The "secret" indictment upon which the kidnap, incarceration and

theft are based, has been Refused for Cause timely (considering preparation of proper remedy) and the

red ink original Reftisal. for Cause has been returned to William D. Mason, in his copy of the.

counterclaim and summons. All other copies and the original counterclaim filed with the court have

black ink (copy) Refusals for Cause on the face of the "secret" indictment of November 6, 2007.

Verified Statement Of Right

Anthony Lewis owns all items in his name and any legal artifice he has chosen to do business as, having

established a prior perfected maritime lien evidenced by National UCC Filing # 2007-2284268-01.01.

Stipulation Of Acceptable Answer

The issue is simple: Agents of a foreign principal are required to file their complaint in the

appropriate district court prior to exercising any claim against a man on the land. This is international

and connnon law; which includes but is not limited to, any and all agents acting for the Bankruptcy of

the United States, through any of its District of Columbia Corporations or Political Subdivisions.

William D. Mason must directly address the validity of the (telephone) certificate of search that clearly

shows there have been no claims filed against"Anthony Lewis" or any pseudonym through which

Anthony Lewis may be engaged in contract. The court clerk James R. Manspeaker (District of Colorado,

now replaced by Gregory Latigham) obfuscated remedy by denying proper certificates, so William D.

Mason and anyone else for that matter can easily research case history against Anthony Lewis or any

legal name. William D. Mason may call (216). 357-7000 to conduct searches and of course the Article III

judge can research cases in chambers. Itis however reasonable to say that if the William D. Mason is

moving on a valid claim and judgment in the district court then the William D. Mason knows what case

that is.

The United States is not a party in interest to this action. Any registered attomey responding for William

D. Mason cannot be a citizen of the United States due to the de jure Thirteenth Amendment of the

Consti.tution. A certified copy is attached and fully incorporated i.nto this counterclaim. (The federal.

judge assigned this case is competent to adjudicate under Article III due to "inactive" status with the

State Supreme Court attorney register.) Addressing the certificate of search is the only response that will

be considered an answer to this counterclaim. Failure to answer will be met with Default Judgment for

Anthony Lewis according to the notice oh the face of the Summons.

Stipulation of remedy

The recourse sought is immediate exclusive original cognizance of the United States through the

district court. This case is repository for evidence for injunctive relief from any future presentments,

kidnap, incarceration, or theft actions from any foreign agents or principals. Anthony Lewis' mother:

Melvia Delois, and brother: Darryl Lamar, may also use this case jacket for an evidence repository as

well. Though the kidnap/incarceration/theft could be justified by notice and sophistry under the color of

law of municipal structure, the proceedings have obviously been under the pretended authority of

unconscionable contracts and the recourse requested is proper. There is no excuse for the arbitrary and

capricious attoniey actions - debt action in assumpsit - that have confronted good men and women

since the Banker's Holiday. Roosevelt implemented a "voluntary compliance" national debt (upon the

States by Governor's Convention) but utilized the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act to compel citizens

of the United States to comply. The substitution of citizen of the Uaited States for the German nationals

on this land was against Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U.S. 239 (1921) where the Court clearly expresses "The

Trading with the Enemy Act, originally and as amended, is strictly a war trieasure..." - directly citing the

Constitution Article I, § 8, clause 11. The war on the Great.Depression 1) does not count and 2) would

only last the duration of the emergency if it did. Presentments will be treated as described by the

following example of clerk instruction:

Anthony Lewisc/o Notary Acceptor:

P.O. Box 24180Mayfield Heights, Ohio stste

[44122]

United States District Courtfor the Northern District of Ohio - Cleveland Division801 West Superior AvenueCleveland, Ohio

[441 I3-1830]

Certified Mail #

Dear clerk; .DcQ'v,'-a

Please file this refusal for cause in the case jacket of Article III case # This isevidence if this presenter claims I have obligations to perform or makes false claims against me in the future:A copy of this instruction has been sent with the original refusal for cause back to the presenter in a tiinely

fashion.

Certificate oYMailing

My signature below expresses that I have mailed a copy of the presentment, refused for cause withthe original clerk instruction to the district court and the original presentment, refused for cause in red inkand a copy of this clerk instruction has been mailed registered mail as indicatid back to the pres93to&Kithin a

few days of presentment.

Presenter's name Certified Mail #

Address_Anywhere, State.

[presenter's code]

William D. Mason and all principals and agents are hereby properly notified. There is no-

governmental immunity to cover "law enforcement officers" who choose ta interfere with our rights to

the land and violators will be arrested by the U.S. Marshal according to Rule C of the Supplemental

Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. William D. Mason and all principals and agents are

left witb their remedy:

COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES ... 136. When.a seizure has been voluntarily abandoned, it loses its

validity, and no juris.diction attaches to any court, unless there be a new seizure. 10 Wheat. 3.25;.1 Mason,

361. First JudiciaryAct; September24, 1789. Bouvier's Law Dictionaryy-1856..

Upon offense by hostilepresentinent aft er the inevitable Default by William D. Mason (including all

agents; principals and any and all offensive presentments), after fair notice by Refusal for Cause like the

above Clerk Instruction, a Certificate of Exigent Circumstances will be issued pursuant to Rule

C(3)(a)(ii)(B) Arrest Warrant and the clerk will immediately issue an Arrest Warrant for William D.

Mason or named agent or principal to be taken into custody for the violations of law. Presentments of

any kind from William D. Mason or any agent acting for the BANKRUPTCY OF THE UNITED

STATES through the DISTRICT may be considered hostile threat of seizure:

Stipulation Regarding Character And Residential Address

The use of a residential address is by right. All 'privileges' associated with postal delivery are

compensated, usually prepaid in honestly won U.S. currency. Anthony Lewis is not Pro Se and is not

representing hiirisel£ The clerk shall not change the name of this suit on the docket. from the..naine on

the filing fee receipt. Anthony Lewis retains the unalienable right to hold the district court clerk to the

obligations of perforinance, as a file clerk for the United States.wQrking inthe Uiuted States Courthouse.

This includes the stipulation that if and when this cause reaches Default Judgment against Williatn D.

Mason the Default Judgment will be filed in full cognizance of the United States and will appear on the ..

docket as "Default Judgment forthe plaintiff." Anthony Lewis is authorized by Private.Offset

Discharging and Indemnity Bond # ALJ-071031=PDIB, bearing USPS Article No. RE 229 297634 US,

secured by Henry M. Paulson, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury, since on or about November 8, 2007, to file

Default Judgment in lieu of district court action. Any such judgment will stand on the truth for validity.

Any character assassination will activate Instnunentality Rule and pierce the corporate veil of the United .

States and all agencies. Usage of residential address is non-assumpsit and changes Anthony Lewis'

character not in the least:

The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the personwho is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retainedonly by snstained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only wheii insisted uponby a belligerent claimant in person. Quote from federal judge Lee in United States v, Johnson et al. No.11400, Middle District of Pennsylvania, 76 R. Supp. 538; 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3057, February 26, 1947.emphasis added

The highlighted bold sentence in the above quote adnionishes against any clerk action that falsely brands

Anthony Lewis Pro Se - to imply that Anthony Lewis is representing himself before the district cotui.

Anthony Lewis is responsible asylum state visiting his judiciary under Rule E(8). If an Article I (active

attorney) "judge" is assigned this case or the Article III judge chooses to protect the fiduciary interests of

the Bank and Fund, to act as an attorney under Article I, maintain silence. The cash filing fee is fully

paid in nublic monev and not in nrivate credit. Anv presumptions made about the fiuids for this filing fee

are that Anthony Lewis has already exercised entitlement to.redeem any Federal Reserve Bank notes

tendered as legal tender for a.ll debts public and private. Furthermore any and all funds discussed have

been in redemption of Federal Reserve Bank notes; not endorsement thereof:

"BANKRUPTCY. The state or condition of a. bankrapt.2. Bankrupt laws are an encroachnient upon the common law. The first in England was ..." Bouvier's Law

Dictionary 1856.

All testimony will be without immunity - piercing the corporate veil and Instrumentality Rule.

Anthony Lewis is a man with God-given unalienable rights, one living and regenerate entity of sound

mind and body. For some realistic perspective the Credit River Money Decision is attached and fully

incorporated into this counterclaim. William D. Mason is clearly the debtor and Anthony Lewis is

clearly creditor.

No Magistrates

No one may handle this case but an Article III Judge. The nature of this cause is injunctive relief,

albeit preemptive. Title 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) cannot ensue, "...except a motion for injunctive

relie£.."

Attachments Fully Incorporated:

1) Certificate of search on"Anthony Lewis" from clerk of the district court is exempted due to falsifications bydistrict court clerk Geri M. Smith on such certificates. William D. Mason is provided with information to checkfor case histories.

2) "Secret" Indictment of November 6, 2007, resulting from the Criminal Complaint filed by William D. Masonrefused for cause. The red ink original Refusal is in the counterclaim served upon William D. Mason. The originalcounterclaim filed in the district court has a copy of the Refusal sent to the party named in the counterclaim. .

3) Certified copy of the dejure Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

4) Certified copy or facsimile of Title 12 U.S.C. § 411 - lawful money upon demand.

5) Certified copy of the Credit River Money Decision.

Anthony Lewisdo Notaty Acceptor:

P.O. Box 24180Mayfield Heights, Ohio stste

[441221

Addresses

United States District Courtfor the Northern District of Ohio - Cleveland Division801 West Superior AvenueCleveland, Ohio

[44113-1830]

Anthony Lewisc/o Notary AcceptorMayfield Heights, Ohio state

[44124]

William D. Mason; County Prosecutor1200 Ontario Street, 8`i' & 9`i' FloorsCleveland, Ohio

[44113]

(216) 357-7000

(216) 378-9781

(216) 443-7800